??? Burgon lived in the 1800sThanks, but I prefer to trust the work by Burgon.
He was closest to these historical events.
Join For His Glory for a discussion on how
https://christianforums.net/threads/a-vessel-of-honor.110278/
https://christianforums.net/threads/psalm-70-1-save-me-o-god-lord-help-me-now.108509/
Read through the following study by Tenchi for more on this topic
https://christianforums.net/threads/without-the-holy-spirit-we-can-do-nothing.109419/
Join Sola Scriptura for a discussion on the subject
https://christianforums.net/threads/anointed-preaching-teaching.109331/#post-1912042
Strengthening families through biblical principles.
Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.
Read daily articles from Focus on the Family in the Marriage and Parenting Resources forum.
??? Burgon lived in the 1800sThanks, but I prefer to trust the work by Burgon.
He was closest to these historical events.
I checked the links and they are working.The link you had sent me regarding the translation did not support your theory.
The corrupted versions are the ones that make Yahshua appear as the Father.If you're using the NIV or any modern-day English translation, they are all translated from the Westcott and Hort 1881 Revised Greek Version. Their Greek version was taken from corrupt texts, and they changed the word "God" to say "Who" which grammatically doesn't make sense with the rest of the passage.
Not one translation stated that.Who is (Elohiym / God of the living ones?)
I didn't say they are not working.I checked the links and they are working.
God says, in order to be rich, you must give everything away.God certainly is logic, in the same way he is love. I highly recommend the (very large) book Logic by Vern S. Poythress. To quote:
"Everything God created is distinct from him. It is all subject to him. Therefore, logic is not a second absolute, over God or beside him. There is only one Absolute, God himself. Logic is in fact an aspect of his character, because it expresses the consistency of God and the faithfulness of God. Consistency and faithfulness belong to the character of God. We can say that they are attributes of God. God is who he is (Ex. 3:14), and what he is includes his consistency and faithfulness. There is nothing more ultimate than God. So God is the source for logic. The character of God includes his logicality." (p.63)
"God has thoughts infinitely above ours (Isa. 55:8-9), but we may also have access to his thoughts when he reveals them: "How precious to me are your thoughts, O God!" (Ps. 139:17). We are privileged to think God's thoughts after him. Our experience of thinking, reasoning, and forming arguments imitates God and reflects the mind of God. Our logic reflects God's logic. Logic, then, is an aspect of God's mind. Logic is universal among all human beings in all cultures, because there is only one God, and we are all made in the image of God." (p. 64)
"If an argument is indeed valid, its validity holds for all times and all places. That is, its validity is omnipresent (in all places) and eternal (for all times). Logical validity has these two attributes that are classically attributed to God." (p. 65)
He goes on to show how laws of logic, since they do not change and are infallibly true, are also immutable and truthful, both attributes of God. He also states that logic is personal because it is rational.
"So logic or reason is an aspect of God's speaking. We can see this is true when God created the world in Genesis 1. His speech includes logical self-consistency and rationality. The same truth holds supremely for the eternal Word of God who is God. This eternal Word is the eternal speech of God. He is therefore also the eternal logic or reason of God, as an aspect of God's speech." (p.71)
"Logic as we human beings experience it has roots in eternal logic, namely, the eternal Word, the second person of the Trinity, in fellowship with the Father and the Spirit." (p. 86)
"Christian transcendence says that God is ultimate, and there is no other. He is the source of all norms, including norms in logic. God's self-consistency is the source and foundation for all logical consistency that we as human beings experience. Logic is not an impersonal, abstract principle or set of principles above God. Rather, logic is personal. Ultimately, it is a person, namely, the second person of the Trinity, the Logos. God comprehends himself perfectly, and he is the standard for logic." (p. 111)
One of the main purposes of the book is to show the difference between the Christian use of logic and the non-Christian use. It is unfortunate that it seems many in certain Christian circles have a negative view of logic that isn't at all biblical, but it does explain why beliefs such as KJVOism--the most irrational and needlessly divisive belief in Christianity, that I know of--persist.
Well, if you have sons of God in the Old Testament then God really is their Father.The corrupted versions are the ones that make Yahshua appear as the Father.
It certainly is, understood correctly. God is saying that we must utterly trust in him and surrender everything. Being that he is the creator and sustainer of all, that is logical. That is logic properly applied as a Christian. Your argument is based on a non-Christian application of logic.God says, in order to be rich, you must give everything away.
God says, in order to be exalted you must humble yourself.
God says, in order to save your life, you must give it up to death.
This from the mouth of God is not logic.
Yes, God made sure that his truth prevailed through numerous Bible versions, the vast majority of which will help lead an unbeliever to salvation and not, on its own, lead a believer into error.Israel also was hard-core Scripturists. They had only ONE Bible.
Not hundreds on the market today that have brought confusion to Christian lives.
But Jesus came to bring division and like He divides sheep from goats He also divides His Scripture from false Scripture and its mutilation at the hands of men.
But there is a Star-Bible men cannot touch. And men hate God for that, too.
It's sad that men before we were born did great damage to God's Word and today Christians support their deeds.
But God has His people in possession of the truth of His Word in the true Scriptures today.
The rest live in castles of sand.
If you want to know the truth, you need to dig deep. Truth is on the bottom of the trash can.Not one translation stated that.
No, God is contradicting human logic.It certainly is, understood correctly. God is saying that we must utterly trust in him and surrender everything. Being that he is the creator and sustainer of all, that is logical. That is logic properly applied as a Christian. Your argument is based on a non-Christian application of logic.
Yes, God made sure that his truth prevailed through numerous Bible versions, the vast majority of which will help lead an unbeliever to salvation and not, on its own, lead a believer into error.
The point is that you use logic too. Burgon used logic and human reasoning too. The compilation of the Majority Text, the translation of the KJV, and every other Bible translation required thinking and human reasoning too as part of a process that was NON-inspired.No, God is contradicting human logic.
He says if you want to become rich give away everything you have.
He says if you want to be exalted you must humble yourself.
He says if you want to save your life you must give it up.
God in saying this totally destroys human logic.
So, no, God is not logical.
He has His own thoughts about human existence, and it is not based on Platonic or Aristotelian logic.
I know the truth.If you want to know the truth, you need to dig deep. Truth is on the bottom of the trash can.
Methinks thou needest to learn more about this translation study.The point is that you use logic too. Burgon used logic and human reasoning too. The compilation of the Majority Text, the translation of the KJV, and every other Bible translation required thinking and human reasoning too as part of a process that was NON-inspired.
Later Byzantine manuscripts are closer to the Majority Text than early ones. There are hundreds of splits where there is no clear majority where decisions had to be made to determine which variant to use in the Majority Text. The OT used in the Majority Text includes non-majority reading variants. And as already stated the Majority Text didn't become the majority until the ninth century, which contradicts the assumption of *providential preservation.*
But for all the claims of Alexandrian "corruption" those manuscripts are still ~98% agreement with the Majority Text.
The truth is whether it's the Alexandrian, Western or Byzantine manuscripts there is nothing in any of them that compromises the truth of the gospel message of salvation
That's wonderful brother! AmenGod has used the KJV to speak directly to me under the anointing. But I can't explain it to you, and you would not understand until you've experienced the same anointing and evevent.
Yes, I've had the privilege of witnessing bona fide (natural law defying) miracles, too (which isn't the focus, our Lord is, but wonderful to experience some of what we read in Scripture firsthand). Blessings to you, my friend.Tell me, have you ever heard the voice of God?
8 But about the Son he says,If you want to know the truth, you need to dig deep. Truth is on the bottom of the trash can.
Psalm 45:68 But about the Son he says,
“Your throne, O God, will last for ever and ever;
a scepter of justice will be the scepter of your kingdom.
9 You have loved righteousness and hated wickedness;
therefore God, your God, has set you above your companions
by anointing you with the oil of joy.”[
So even though your translation is disputed its stated as about the "Son" -Hebrews 1:8
So about the Son Hebrews 1:8Psalm 45:6
6. Your throne, (O God, god / elohiym / god of the Living One,) will last for ever and ever; a scepter of justice will be the scepter of your kingdom.
7. You love righteousness and hate wickedness;
therefore (God / Elohiym,) your (God / Elohiym,) has set you above your companions
by anointing you with the oil of joy.
Psalm 110:1
(The Lord / Yahwah) says to my lord: “Sit at my right hand until I make your enemies a footstool for your feet.”
Isaiah 16:5
In love a throne will be established; in faithfulness a man will sit on it— one from the house of David— one who in judging seeks justice and speeds the cause of righteousness.
Matthew 20:23
Jesus said to them, “You will indeed drink from my cup, but to sit at my right or left is not for me to grant. These places belong to those for whom they have been prepared by my Father.”
I stand corrected, Psalm 45:6 is about Yahshua.
It should read:So about the Son Hebrews 1:8
Your throne, (O God, god / elohiym / god of the Living One
Neither the Hebrew to english from psalms 45:6 nor the greek to english from hebrews 1:8 states "O god of the living one" that I read.It should read:
Hebrews 1:8
But about the Son he says, Your throne, O god of "The living One", will last for ever and ever; a scepter of justice will be the scepter of your kingdom.
Yahwah reveals His name to Moses
Exodus 3:13-15.
13 And Moses said to Elohiym, “Suppose I go to the siblings of the Israelites and say to them, 'The Elohiym of your forefathers has sent me to you,' and they ask me, 'What is His name?' What shall I say to them?”
14 And Elohiym said to Moses, “The Living that Lives. This is what you are to say to the Israelites: 'The Living has sent me to you.”
15 And Elohiym also said to Moses, “Say to the Israelites, 'Yahwah, the Elohiym of your forefathers; the Elohiym of Abraham, the Elohiym of Isaac and the Elohiym of Jacob has sent me to you.' That’s my name forever, the name by which I’m to be remembered, from generation to generation.”
Jeremiah 10:10
But (the Lord / Yahwah) is the true (God / God of the living ones;) he is the living (God of the living ones,) the eternal King.