chessman
Member
I understood that the verse you were making reference to was Matthew 10:28 (that was what I thought anyway) and in the NKJV it is worded as follows:
But rather fear Him who is able to destroy both soul and body in hell.
Actually the NKJV of 10:28 says more than the partial phrase you posted from it above or the one word you posted previously from it as does the whole passage of 2 Thess 1:6-10 that I posted. I simply underlined the single portion I was making a single point about, as I will do below.
Matthew 10:28 (NKJV)And do not fear those who kill the body but cannot kill the soul. But rather fear Him who is able to destroy both soul and body in hell.
My point is about fearing His destruction yet not fearing death.
Why would Jesus say to fear something He will not actually do (yet others cannot) while at the same time saying not to fear something that will actually occur?
I don't see this saying that He will destroy both soul and body but that He is able to do so.
I understand He doesn't say here that He will destroy both body and soul in Hell. In fact He doesn't even come right out and say it's Him that is able to do it. Kind of leaves the fact that it's actually Him He's talking about open-ended prior to His actual resurrection. But Paul, after Jesus' resurrection and John's revelation of Jesus Christ makes no ambiguity about it being Him doing the "destruction". Seems like progressive revelation to me.
Speaking of "eternal destruction" in 2 Thes 1:6-10 and "destroy both soul and body" in Matt 10:28:
So to rectify that with 2 Thessalonians it seems that one probably shouldn't stop where you ended your underline but maybe continue to the end of the phrase?
Rectify what? I don't see anything that needs conversion or correction (rectification) between the verses (all of them).
Am I understanding you correctly that in Matt 10:28 the punishment of the wicked sounds like the very literal destruction of both the body and soul in Hell "by Him who is able to" do just that (but will not actually do that). Yet in 2 Thess 1:6-10 "eternal destruction away from His presence sounds to you more like 'life' "away from" the presence of the omnipresent Lord (the very sustainer of life) for an eternity?
In my mind and understanding, being away from the Lord for eternity would be a life of eternal destruction.
I've re-read all of the 2 Thess passage (not just the underlined portion), and I don't find "life" being mentioned for unbelievers when the one who is able to destroy both the body and soul returns with power. Where did you get that understanding of "life" from?
Last edited: