Christian Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Homosexuality - Sin? Why?

Gendou,

Is your avatar for a sarcastic purpose or are you pro Mason?

It looks cool for the record.... :oops:

For the topic at hand....

Watch Brokeback mountain to really get a new look on gays.....
 
gingercat said:
Alcoholism is disease and they can be cured and I believe homosexuality can be cured too if they choose to.

No. Our current scientific understanding of this issue disagrees with you. Homosexuality is not something that can be "cured". It's genetic, just like your hair color. Some people genetically have brown hair, some people genetically have dark skin, and some people genetically are homosexual.
 
C3Troop said:
So again, I repeat, a dark figure more than likely exists. If you want to prove your point I would love for you to look into the studies and enlighten me. "A wise man loves rebuke."

What, tell me, do you mean by a "dark figure"? It sounds like you're advocating a conspiracy theory where there is no need for one.

If you are not satisfied with Wikipedia's sources, I invite you to research the scientific community at large. Because the current scientific consensus is that homosexuality is genetic, you can search whichever scientific journals or articles you'd like and still find the same conclusion being reached.

Ok next. If it's genetic you can't choose it? That's just crazy lol. Again, alcholoism has strong genetic roots, but you CHOOSE whether you want to drink or not. You just have a TENDENCY to want to drink more. Genetics don't make decisions.

Err, yes genetics do "make decisions". Can you choose your hair color, or your skin color? Of course not. You can dye your hair (and color your skin) all you like, but at the end of the day it'll just grow back as its natural color. It's the exact same thing with homosexuality.
 
Gendou,

Is your avatar for a sarcastic purpose or are you pro Mason?

It looks cool for the record....

No, I don't like the Mason nor any other Illuminati for that matter. They're probably all evil conspirators. I chose to use their symbol because of what it represents.

From About.com
One of the most common symbols of Freemasonry is the symbol of the crossed compass and set-square. The compass and square are architect's tools, and symbolize God as the architect of the universe, among other things.

As measuring instruments, the tools represent judgement and discernment.

The compass, which is used to draw circles, represents the realm of the spiritual- eternity. It is symbolic of the defining and limiting principle, and also of infinite boundaries.

The angle measures the square, the symbol of earth and the realm of the material. The square reprents fairness, balance, firmness, etc., which is reflected in phrases such as "on the square" and "squared away." Something that is squared is something that is stable, a foundation for building upon.

Together, the compass and square represent the convergence of matter and spirit, and the convergence of earthly and spiritual responsibilities. The two symbols together form a hexagram, the union of earth with the heavens, matter and mind, etc.
 
Novum said:
No. Our current scientific understanding of this issue disagrees with you. Homosexuality is not something that can be "cured". It's genetic, just like your hair color. Some people genetically have brown hair, some people genetically have dark skin, and some people genetically are homosexual.

Because I believe God and Jesus, and the Bible says homosexuality is sin I believe it is curable.
 
Novum, you still have not answered any of the questions I have raised.

A dark figure is a figure that is not reported when census are taken. Ex. many more crimes are committed than those reported. In the same way, many more homosexual "families" exist than just those being surveyed. This leads me to believe that they only seek the ones that will further there agenda of demoralizing America and leading the nation straight to hell. It appears to me that you have not researched this topic due to the fact that everytime I ask you to provide info to me you tell me to go look it up. If you truly know, why don't you tell me?

Again, genetics (when speaking of your genetic tendencies to act a certain way) does not mean you have to be that way. Genetics as far as your physical characteristics are not the same as your tendencies. Some people are more susceptible to get angry. Does this mean they are always angry and can do nothing about it? No it just means they have to use their WILL and control it. I think you're a bit confused about genetics. Look into the Science of it all. Genetics as far as tendencies is alot different than physical makeup. Read up on some Science and then maybe what I'm saying will make sense to you.

-----------Cody
 
gingercat said:
Novum said:
But since you seem to be willing to leave them be, why all the fuss about homosexuality?

I would like to chime in if you dont mind. He just reponded to the thread. I feel the same way about homosexuality. There are so many sins according to the Bible. Sexual immorality is one of the major sins.

If one of my kids claims to live a homosexual life I will not give him or her my blessings. I will not have anything to do with him or her until he or she repents. Homosexuality is a desease like alcholosim. If you are believer you can choose to be healed with God's help.

exactly what the savior would do! right on! :roll: yeaaaa....... you shoulda told that to Jesus, you know "have nuthing to do with us" and all, coulda saved him a trip to the cross.
 
gingercat said:
Because I believe God and Jesus, and the Bible says homosexuality is sin I believe it is curable.

Then you knowingly do away with science should it conflict with your bible.

That's all you needed to say; our discussion can no longer continue. Good day. :)
 
C3Troop said:
Novum, you still have not answered any of the questions I have raised.

I didn't think I missed any. Perhaps you could restate them specifically?

A dark figure is a figure that is not reported when census are taken. Ex. many more crimes are committed than those reported. In the same way, many more homosexual "families" exist than just those being surveyed.

Of course there are more families that exist than are surveyed!

Have you ever read up on statistics or surveys? If you had even a basic knowledge on the subject, you would know that the precise reason why surveys are even conducted is because it is virtually impossible to ask a question to all relevant people nationwide!

This leads me to believe that they only seek the ones that will further there agenda of demoralizing America and leading the nation straight to hell.

Please provide evidence that all these survey givers have an agenda.
Please provide evidence that all these survey givers support homosexuality.
Please provide evidence that all these survey givers seek to "demoralize America" or "lead the nation straight to hell".

Heck, please provide evidence that all survey givers are even religious or believe in hell.

You're full of crap, C3Troop, and it shows.

It appears to me that you have not researched this topic due to the fact that everytime I ask you to provide info to me you tell me to go look it up. If you truly know, why don't you tell me?

Because I don't know about the surveys and studies or how they were conducted, nor have I ever claimed to. All I know is the results that were reported on the Wikipedia page.

Again, genetics (when speaking of your genetic tendencies to act a certain way) does not mean you have to be that way. Genetics as far as your physical characteristics are not the same as your tendencies. Some people are more susceptible to get angry. Does this mean they are always angry and can do nothing about it? No it just means they have to use their WILL and control it. I think you're a bit confused about genetics. Look into the Science of it all. Genetics as far as tendencies is alot different than physical makeup. Read up on some Science and then maybe what I'm saying will make sense to you.

Please provide some evidence - any shred of evidence - that sexual orientation is at all different from hair color, eye color, skin color, height, shoe size, or the genetic characteristic of your choice.
 
i agree with Novum here, i know a couple of gay guys, who desperatly wish they were strait and could be attracted to females. they hate the lifestyle that comes along with being gay. you gotta use your brain on this, im not sayin disregard science or the bible. but here you realy dont need to go there for answers on this. lets try some common sinse.

why would anybody thats gay, want to continue to be gay? you know the hatered that goes along with being gay, and its just a sucky way to live life, with all the bashing and tormenting. if they could stop im sure they would, i know there are some that choose to be gay, but not all.

how could you beeing a man, just wake up one day and say, herm.....i think ill start haveing sex with men. not realy that logical. in my opinion anyway.

and if you take the genetic make up of homos, im talking about physical attributes, the butch like wemon? the prissy feminine males, they definatly dont choose that.

its in there genetic make up. oviously
 
jive said:
exactly what the savior would do! right on! :roll: yeaaaa....... you shoulda told that to Jesus, you know "have nuthing to do with us" and all, coulda saved him a trip to the cross.

It seems that you are the kind to believe Jesus died on the cross so that He is giving us license to continually sin.
 
gingercat said:
jive said:
exactly what the savior would do! right on! :roll: yeaaaa....... you shoulda told that to Jesus, you know "have nuthing to do with us" and all, coulda saved him a trip to the cross.

It seems that you are the kind to believe Jesus died on the cross so that He is giving us license to continually sin.

im sry to disapoint you...........but im the "kind" that believes he died on the cross for everybodys sins not just those who arnt gay, all sins. if your child was a liar i bet you wouldnt say "im not to have nothin to do you then" . all i was saying is that if Jesus thought like you do what wouldve he come for?? who did he come to teach?? ponder on that.
 
jive said:
im sry to disapoint you...........but im the "kind" that believes he died on the cross for everybodys sins not just those who arnt gay, all sins. if your child was a liar i bet you wouldnt say "im not to have nothin to do you then" . all i was saying is that if Jesus thought like you do what wouldve he come for?? who did he come to teach?? ponder on that.

I am sorry I did not word it very well. All I am saying is that I will not approve of sinful living and will not pretend it is ok to live it.

I have three children in my home and we have happy family living by Jesus's teachings.
 
C3Troop said:
Sputnik, I'm not sure if you just didn't read my post because you didn't want to or if you just misunderstood it. Read it again.

What I'm getting at in regard to the text you gave (and probably others that you didn't give) is that it ASSUMES that one is heterosexual and is therefore sinning against his natural desires. It could be argued that a homosexual is NOT 'sinning' against any natural desires since he/she is not a heterosexual to begin with.

You will also note that it is a text that is very specific gendered, i.e. no reference to females. It (and other similar texts) make no allowance for those who might be born with genetics that lean toward homosexuality. Again, I know from experience with others that SOME - anyway - are most definitely predisposed toward same-sex attraction. They never asked for it. This does NOT mean that they are all necessarily promiscuous, in fact I'm sure that any number of them are virgins.

I don't believe that 'promiscuity' is what this thread is addressing but the homosexual 'tendencies' of others. Christians need to make allowances for the fact that genetics that lead to choice could be a scientific fact. And, I repeat, the Bible - as good a book as it is - does NOT address this issue.


C3Troop said:
"from a recreational perspective" There you go. From a recreational point of view is a non-existent point of view in a Christian's eyes. You can't recreationally make love outside of marriage. Man and man can't be married.

Which is why some committed homosexuals prefer to have their union recognized as in a marriage. They are damned if they do and damned if they don't, aren't they? Remember, bigamy was an accepted practice by the Bible at one time.

C3Troop said:
How does man laying with man not address the issue? Biblically it's saying exactly what you said the Bible doesn't say. If you want Scripture and I can provide it, then you should actually read it. I feel as though I proved something you thought was unprovable and now you just say, "oh well that doesn't matter."

All I am saying is that the text you presented does NOT address a very complex issue. A genetically 'wired-up' homosexual is not going to turn 'straight' by reading that text. But, this is what Christians expect them to do. It's nonsense.

C3Troop said:
Honestly, I'm kind of confused as to how you can Scientifcally argue for homosexuality. "Science" is supposed to be the smart way of dealing with things and if you can't see that two penis' or two vaginas don't go together, well sorry to say but you're no "scientists". I mean it's kind of common sense to see, so I will let you go in further to prove to ME why they do go together.

I say again ..."common sense" does NOT address a very complex issue. I personally don't need to prove anything to you but I would suggest that you and others do some research before giving YOUR expert opinions. I don't mean to be unkind but there IS a great deal of ignorance being displayed here. I'm a Christian but I don't believe that the Bible addresses this issue at all.

C3Troop said:
I have yet to see a smart scientific, or Biblical argument for homosexuality. I have shown many examples of both as to how homosexuality is wrong, so now it's your turn to give me some evidence :lol: Have a good day guys.

Your display of levity here is a little disconcerting, Cody. Christians need to put down their Bibles for a moment and actually ADDRESS this issue! There are other human beings involved here who need more than condemning biblical texts.
 
I don't understand your question. If you're asking if it's in the Bible then I can give you verses.

Would you, please? I would appreciate it.

I see that this discussion has grown. Until recently, I have not had the time to reply which is unfortunate since I was the original poster. However, here are my views on homosexuality:

I remain skeptical of homosexuals and their lifestyle, but I do not hate them. The thing which I do detest is sodomy. I personally don't believe - at least to my knowledge - that laws against the attraction between two of the same gender can be found in the Bible. Warnings or laws against sodomy, however, can be found in the Bible. Ex: if a man lies with another man as he would a woman, then it is sin or some such thing. That was just paraphrasing a passage from Scripture of course.

And if something isn't in the original texts of Scripture, you cannot assume that God hates it or hates even the people who commit the 'sin'. Well, there's my opinion. I'll try to clarify it if people want explanations.

My concern is that if laws against homosexual feelings toward another can be found in the original scriptures, then LET ME KNOW. We already know that laws against sodomy are found in Scripture. Also, if any scientific evidence can be used against sodomy as showing that it is harmful, LET ME KNOW (PLEASE). I would appreciate it very much. Thank you. :)
 
SputnikBoy said:
fact that genetics that lead to choice could be a scientific fact. And, I repeat, the Bible - as good a book as it is - does NOT address this issue. [/color]

Rod, here is Paul addressing the homosexuality;

1 Cor 6:9 "Do you not know that the wicked will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do yot be decieved: Neither the sexually immoral nor idlaters nor adulterers nor male prostitutes nor homosexual offenders..."

Rod, I don't understand why you don't think all of the New Testament teachings are not Jesus' teachings. Those apostles and disciples lerned from Jesus and they all got instruction from Jesus. John says that they did not write down all of Jesus' teachings or something like that.

It is not biblical if you dismiss any of NT disciples' teachings.

We should please God instead of the world view point. The Bible is much more accurate than secular science. Secular science is always behind the Bible!
 
fact that genetics that lead to choice could be a scientific fact. And, I repeat, the Bible - as good a book as it is - does NOT address this issue.

The Bible does not address the issue? Gingercat posted one solid passage above. I am sure that many others have been posted in this thread. What I want to refute is your "genetic" arguement. It is kind of the "if it feels good do it" arguement.

Now I am not going to argue whether homosexuality is or is not "genetic". It may be difficult to tell since we have corrupt natures. It may be that this corruption has occured by a genetic deformity. Noone has yet produced a "gay gene" however and so the question is still open to debate. There are some tests on identical twins and such that are interesting. There are also some interesting studies regarding stress in women during world war II that seemed to cause a rise in homosexuality. Also in families with dominating mothers there seems to be a greater incidence of homosexuality. This may indicate a "learned" component. It may well even be a mistake to say that there is only one cause. There are different causes of diabetes, some genetic, some enviromental. Why does it have to be one or the other.

But the idea that it is genetic and therefore that makes it okay has some flaws. First of all, there is evidence of genetic links to such things as alcoholism or divorce. Does this mean the alcoholic should keep drinking and not try to stop or seek help? Does it mean that alcoholism is acceptable behavior? I think not. Further, that something is "genetic" implies that it is the correct state of that person. Well as I mentioned above diabetes can be genetic. There is genetic cancer and many other diseases. So should we let these people die. It is apparently the way God created them.

For my money it does not matter whether homosexuality is genetic or not. There may be some reduced culpability. I'll leave God to judge that. But it is condemned in scripture and must be overcome regardless of the source and I trust in the power of Jesus Christ to be able to help those who struggle with this sin to overcome it. All praise and glory be to him.
 
Excellent post, Thess. I shall cross reference the passage that Ginger and some others have given with other translations and perhaps research it more. Thanks. :wink:
 
Wow, I deliberately avoided this post when it first appeared. Due to the nature of previous posts on this issue, I thought that it had already been hashed out pretty extensively. Why I changed my mind and decided to read through this thread now becomes apparent. Since I have read the responses, I now feel obliged to offer my two cents worth.

Now, let us begin by acknowledgement that there are those that choose to follow what 'they' will follow regardless of the Word. Nothing new.

Is there anyone here that does NOT realize that sodomy is a word that is based on a people that existed in history called 'Sodomites'? These dwelt in a community known as Sodom. We KNOW that these had turned their backs on God to the point that NOT ten righteous people could be found among the entirety of the population, and thus, were UTTERLY destroyed.

Homosexuality is not ONLY wrong, according to the Word is is out-right EVIL. This is NOT what 'I' choose, but what is offered through the Word. Let us examine the 'nature' of homosexuality.

Romans 1:1

18For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who hold the truth in unrighteousness;

19Because that which may be known of God is manifest in them; for God hath shewed it unto them.

This PLAINLY states that NO MATTER WHAT ONE MIGHT "SAY", it is a NATURAL FACT that men and women KNOW that homosexuality is WRONG. THIS is genetic regardless of what those that would defend this behavior might 'say'.

20For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse:

Explanation: The natural course of things was implanted in our hearts from the 'moment' man was created. Whether we choose to 'follow' the natural course or not is irrelevant to the FACT that we are BORN with this 'instinct' to KNOW. (ever notice that homosexuality is tabu in most EVERY culture on the planet?) Only when a culture COMPLETELY turns it's back on God, do such things flourish. Thus, one must actually 'fight' to turn away from those things which pertain to the 'natural course' for which they were created.

21Because that, when they knew God, they glorified him not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened.

Remember, that from the beginning, Adam and Eve KNEW GOD. It only took a handful of generations for man's heart to be hardened to the point that ALL the descendants of Adam and Eve were UTTERLY DESTROYED, (except for one man and his family).

22Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools,

23And changed the glory of the uncorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man, and to birds, and fourfooted beasts, and creeping things.

24Wherefore God also gave them up to uncleanness through the lusts of their own hearts, to dishonour their own bodies between themselves:

RIGHT here folks. THIS IS THE ANSWER. The LUSTS Of those that 'choose' to follow an unnatural course are manifest FROM themselves. Freedom of choice remember. There is NOT a one of us that hasn't at one time or another 'thought' about doing things that ARE WRONG. The prudent man simply pushes those thoughts aside and 'fights' the temptation, therefore avoiding the consequences.

25Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen.

What is the 'creature'? WE ARE. So this offers that those refereed to in these passages CHOSE to follow the lie. Choose to make 'excuses' and ignore what has been offered. NOT chance coincidences, but OUTRIGHT CHOICE.

26For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature:

Lesbianism, BUT not ONLY lesbians but ALL women that use their bodies in an 'un-natural' manor.

27And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.

And here it is: 'homosexuality'.

28And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient;

29Being filled with all unrighteousness, fornication, wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness; full of envy, murder, debate, deceit, malignity; whisperers,

30Backbiters, haters of God, despiteful, proud, boasters, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents,

31Without understanding, covenantbreakers, without natural affection, implacable, unmerciful:

32Who knowing the judgment of God, that they which commit such things are worthy of death, not only do the same, but have pleasure in them that do them.


I allowed the rest of the chapter in order to 'show' who these people had become, or WILL become. For not only does a homosexual 'lie' to others, but by needs, lie to themselves when they make claim that they were 'born' this way. The genetic argument would be NO different than a 'child molester' using the same defense, or a murderer, or a thief, etc, etc,,,,,,,,,,, And being a 'liar' of such caliber, they do naturally gravitate into the rest.

I am aware that there will be many that choose to ignore these passages. So be it. And I am aware that this will NOT be what a homosexual would 'like' to hear. I am NOT here to pass, 'warm fuzzies' in order to appease the masses. I am here to offer what has ALREADY BEEN OFFERED BUT REJECTED BY MANY.

Now, the Bible clearly states that homosexuality is about as far from God as one can possibly get. Don't get me wrong, it does NOT take God for one to be religious. It simply takes a 'different god', in order to 'turn away' from the 'truth' in ones religion. And, unless one 'turns away' from such behavior, (repents), there is NO way that they can follow Christ. The proof of this lies in the fact that one MUST create their 'own' religion in order to ignore these passages.

A discussion of the genetics of homosexuality may or may NOT hold water. I guess, as the OT indicates, that the sins of the fathers can be passed on to his generations. BUT, I don't believe that even this would be 'impossible' to overcome. That is a debatable issue and the answer would be entirely up to the individual and the choices that they make. NO ONE has sex with ANYONE, (short of rape), WITHOUT their cooperation. So, to 'claim' that one was born with genes that cause their desire for the 'same sex' is OF NO CONSEQUENCE. Regardless of their desires, WE KNOW WHAT IS RIGHT AND WHAT IS WRONG. IF the Spirit dwells within us that is.

Now, an issue that is JUST as important: I am quite sure that 'everyone' that dwelt within Sodom were NOT homosexual. Guess what folks, they were destroyed right along with those that were. WhY? Because they condoned this behavior.

Regardless of what some may teach and practice, the Word of God HAS NOT CHANGED. So, those that would defend such behavior are JUST as guilty as those that practice it. There is scripture to back this up and if any are unaware of it, I suggest that before they offer ANYTHING pertaining to issues such as this, they first 'READ' the Word.

So, fall into the 'trap' that has been laid and be ensnared by this 'political correctness' that Satan would so love for all of us to 'accept'. But, beware that, 'one does so' at their own peril.

Any that even 'claim' to be Christian must FIRST accept what Christ and His apostles have offered. Awful had to BE a Christian while being in denial of the Word.

NOPE, not going to leave this one up for debate:

32Who knowing the judgment of God, that they which commit such things are worthy of death, not only do the same, but have pleasure in them that do them.

Here is ONE example of those that condone unrighteous behavior. Folks, WE SHOULDN'T even be discussing such issues. Things that are an abomination to the Father are better left IGNORED. For when we discuss them, in essence, we become a 'part' of them. Therefore, the less we expose ourselves to such, the less likely are these issues to become a 'part' of our lives. JUST like the tree of knowledge. UNTIL man partook of it, there was NO EVIL TO BE KNOWN.
 
Imagican -

I was going to reply, but your post is so riddled with strawmen, logical fallacies, and outright, unadulterated hate speech that I'd rather it stand on its own as an example of a true "loving" Christian.
 
Back
Top