I
Imagican
Guest
And without controversy great is the mystery of godliness: God was manifest in the flesh, justified in the Spirit, seen of angels, preached unto the Gentiles, believed on in the world, received up into glory. 1 Timothy 3:16
First line: great IS the mystery of godliness, this is WITHOUT doubt. But please note that the word 'godliness' IS spelled with a 'little' g. The rest I find quite contraversial considering that this is the ONLY place in the Bible something is stated 'as such'. And even this is very suspect.
For 'why' would God NEED be justified in the Spirit? Or, for what purpose would Timothy state; "seen of angels" IF we are refereing to God Himself? Would the ANGELS have been 'created' by God? And, furthermore, How could God be received BY HIMSELF?
As I have stated before, I believe that there have been pieces of the Word altered to fit the purpose of the CC. Not surprising considering the other underhanded way in which they handled the Word by keeping it from the people for HUNDREDS and HUNDREDS of years.
I am NOT going to say that this HAS been altered for neither you NOR I can prove it one way or the other. What I CAN state without fear of 'changing' God's Word is that these statements seem UTTERLY contradictory to the REST of the Bible. They seem in fact, to be nothing short of 'altered', for there seems to be nothing BUT mystery here.
Solo, it only takes the altering of just a very few crucial words in the Bible to misdirect the meaning behind much of it. Since those that have alternate views of 'trinity' DID NOT write and publish the book, it seems highly likely that those that did were PLENTY capable of altering words at will to fit their understanding. It IS suspect that the 'few' places that 'trinitarians' base their ENTIRE understanding of Christ AS God are NOT in the Gospels, but mysteriously placed in places OTHER than the statements of God or Christ Himself. I know, I know, you're going to contradict what I have stated by offering Johns statements concerning the Word. I have already stated what I believe this is in reference to. I do NOT believe that the word 'WORD' is simply Jesus Christ. So, 'trins' stating that John is 'showing' that Jesus IS God does not 'prove' anything other than a possible 'misunderstanding' of what is 'truly' being stated there.
But Solo, I KNOW the relationship that I have with the Father through His Son. I pray to God 'through' the name of Jesus Christ. I KNOW what Christ did to free us from our sins. I KNOW that Jesus Christ IS the Son of God. And, as I have stated on numerous occasions, (which, by the way, have been MOSTLY ignored), what if I were ALONE in an environment for NO ONE to teach me 'trinity'? Do you honestly believe that I would be LOST for the lack of this teaching of man? For 'trinity' IS a word that is NOT in the Bible. So, for me, you, or ANYONE else to even KNOW the word 'trinity', it is IMPERATIVE that 'some man' teach them.
So, you see, it is those that INSIST that one MUST accept 'trinity' that MUST be wrong. For the Bible PLAINLY states that Christ died for ALL men. For this to be true, 'trinity' MUST be false. For, as I have stated, 'trinity' requires that I 'ignore' what has been offered and accept that which HAS NOT.
I have created NOTHING. I have simply accepted the Word as I understand it and have learned that I need NO institutions to develope a personal relationship with the Father. And when I am belittled and told that this is NOT possible, I know that there is 'something' wrong with the theology or doctrine that 'these' follow. For I KNOW WHAT I KNOW. and for others to deny this means that they DO NOT KNOW what I DO. This, my friend, is SIMPLE logic.
This is NOT some kind of 'game' to me. I have read and read and read and read. I have done numerous 'personal' studiess of the Word on a number of different subjects and have been blessed with quite a bit of understanding in their regards. NO, I am NO Bible scholar in the traditional sense. I have had NO ONE teach me what I have learned. I have read commentaries and most, i have found, to be lacking in ANYTHING other than a 'generic' understanding, (mostly they offer the SAME understanding of the CC). This may mean little to those that accept the CC as 'following the truth', but this too I KNOW is NOT the 'truth'.
So, Solo, show me what you got. Explain to me again how I MUST be lying about what I have stated. Tell me that I am lost and DON'T know God or Christ. This does nothing but make me question whether 'you' know Either. I am NOT trying to be insulting OR sarcastic. I am serious; how can what I say be true if I MUST accept 'trinity' for them to true, and I don't? Now 'THIS' is TRULY a mystery to me.
First line: great IS the mystery of godliness, this is WITHOUT doubt. But please note that the word 'godliness' IS spelled with a 'little' g. The rest I find quite contraversial considering that this is the ONLY place in the Bible something is stated 'as such'. And even this is very suspect.
For 'why' would God NEED be justified in the Spirit? Or, for what purpose would Timothy state; "seen of angels" IF we are refereing to God Himself? Would the ANGELS have been 'created' by God? And, furthermore, How could God be received BY HIMSELF?
As I have stated before, I believe that there have been pieces of the Word altered to fit the purpose of the CC. Not surprising considering the other underhanded way in which they handled the Word by keeping it from the people for HUNDREDS and HUNDREDS of years.
I am NOT going to say that this HAS been altered for neither you NOR I can prove it one way or the other. What I CAN state without fear of 'changing' God's Word is that these statements seem UTTERLY contradictory to the REST of the Bible. They seem in fact, to be nothing short of 'altered', for there seems to be nothing BUT mystery here.
Solo, it only takes the altering of just a very few crucial words in the Bible to misdirect the meaning behind much of it. Since those that have alternate views of 'trinity' DID NOT write and publish the book, it seems highly likely that those that did were PLENTY capable of altering words at will to fit their understanding. It IS suspect that the 'few' places that 'trinitarians' base their ENTIRE understanding of Christ AS God are NOT in the Gospels, but mysteriously placed in places OTHER than the statements of God or Christ Himself. I know, I know, you're going to contradict what I have stated by offering Johns statements concerning the Word. I have already stated what I believe this is in reference to. I do NOT believe that the word 'WORD' is simply Jesus Christ. So, 'trins' stating that John is 'showing' that Jesus IS God does not 'prove' anything other than a possible 'misunderstanding' of what is 'truly' being stated there.
But Solo, I KNOW the relationship that I have with the Father through His Son. I pray to God 'through' the name of Jesus Christ. I KNOW what Christ did to free us from our sins. I KNOW that Jesus Christ IS the Son of God. And, as I have stated on numerous occasions, (which, by the way, have been MOSTLY ignored), what if I were ALONE in an environment for NO ONE to teach me 'trinity'? Do you honestly believe that I would be LOST for the lack of this teaching of man? For 'trinity' IS a word that is NOT in the Bible. So, for me, you, or ANYONE else to even KNOW the word 'trinity', it is IMPERATIVE that 'some man' teach them.
So, you see, it is those that INSIST that one MUST accept 'trinity' that MUST be wrong. For the Bible PLAINLY states that Christ died for ALL men. For this to be true, 'trinity' MUST be false. For, as I have stated, 'trinity' requires that I 'ignore' what has been offered and accept that which HAS NOT.
I have created NOTHING. I have simply accepted the Word as I understand it and have learned that I need NO institutions to develope a personal relationship with the Father. And when I am belittled and told that this is NOT possible, I know that there is 'something' wrong with the theology or doctrine that 'these' follow. For I KNOW WHAT I KNOW. and for others to deny this means that they DO NOT KNOW what I DO. This, my friend, is SIMPLE logic.
This is NOT some kind of 'game' to me. I have read and read and read and read. I have done numerous 'personal' studiess of the Word on a number of different subjects and have been blessed with quite a bit of understanding in their regards. NO, I am NO Bible scholar in the traditional sense. I have had NO ONE teach me what I have learned. I have read commentaries and most, i have found, to be lacking in ANYTHING other than a 'generic' understanding, (mostly they offer the SAME understanding of the CC). This may mean little to those that accept the CC as 'following the truth', but this too I KNOW is NOT the 'truth'.
So, Solo, show me what you got. Explain to me again how I MUST be lying about what I have stated. Tell me that I am lost and DON'T know God or Christ. This does nothing but make me question whether 'you' know Either. I am NOT trying to be insulting OR sarcastic. I am serious; how can what I say be true if I MUST accept 'trinity' for them to true, and I don't? Now 'THIS' is TRULY a mystery to me.