But you first said they're worth the same.
I'm not trying to be difficult. Maybe I'm not understanding you, but I see contradictions within your statements.
Like this...
when you just said they are all worth the same... almost nothing.
I see two problems with what you've posted. You seem to contradict yourself and you give very subjective reasoning when you argue for one of your points. Take, for instance, the "loser" who works at McDonald's and lives with his mother. What if this person also dedicated his life to volunteering at a homeless shelter, McDonald's afforded him the flexibility to spend his days there, but he couldn't afford his own place? Would his life have been worth nothing, having spent a life dedicated to serving others without chasing wealth?
If you're a nihilist, it seems you should be consistent and say every life is worth nothing, because in the end we all dissolve into nothing, as will the planet we live on. It seems to me, this kind of nihilist would be consistent with that belief system. I'm not interrogating you. I'm just trying to better understand you.