Find out how Christians are supposed to act in the following study
https://christianforums.net/threads/charismatic-bible-studies-1-peter-2-11-17.109823/
https://christianforums.net/threads/psalm-70-1-save-me-o-god-lord-help-me-now.108509/
Read through the following study by Tenchi for more on this topic
https://christianforums.net/threads/without-the-holy-spirit-we-can-do-nothing.109419/
Join Sola Scriptura for a discussion on the subject
https://christianforums.net/threads/anointed-preaching-teaching.109331/#post-1912042
Strengthening families through biblical principles.
Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.
Read daily articles from Focus on the Family in the Marriage and Parenting Resources forum.
I guess I always kinda figured it was Satan who put the evil thoughts in the minds of those people. It's not? Sure, I know he comes to attack Christians too, but isn't he also the cause of evil among non-Christians? If not, what is? I know all people have a sinful nature, but I always kinda thought that CAME from Satan?
What about the power of the Holy Spirit in us that we are told is more powerful than "that which is in the world". I always thought "that which is in the world" is referring to Satan. So if the power we have within us (and NOT within non-Christians) is more powerful than Satan, why is Satan so much more successful in getting to us than to others?
So if the power we have within us (and NOT within non-Christians) is more powerful than Satan, why is Satan so much more successful in getting to us than to others?
I guess I always kinda figured it was Satan who put the evil thoughts in the minds of those people. It's not? Sure, I know he comes to attack Christians too, but isn't he also the cause of evil among non-Christians? If not, what is? I know all people have a sinful nature, but I always kinda thought that CAME from Satan?
What about the power of the Holy Spirit in us that we are told is more powerful than "that which is in the world". I always thought "that which is in the world" is referring to Satan. So if the power we have within us (and NOT within non-Christians) is more powerful than Satan, why is Satan so much more successful in getting to us than to others?
It's a good idea to look at the context of Scripture so as to not get the wrong idea.They are still vulnerable to the flesh and to sin all their lifelong. That's why Paul can say, "O wretched man that I am." And at the very end of his life, "I'm the chief sinner." Because as you mature there's a decreasing frequency of sin but there's an increasing hatred of sin that makes less sin seem worse.
- [Paul, giving thanks]: And I thank Christ Jesus our Lord, who hath enabled me, for that he counted me faithful, putting me into the ministry;
- [Paul, speaking of himself]: Who was before a blasphemer, and a persecutor, and injurious: but I obtained mercy, because I did it ignorantly in unbelief.
- [Paul, speaking of grace and love of our Lord]: And the grace of our Lord was exceeding abundant with faith and love which is in Christ Jesus.
- [Paul, speaking of that faithful saying (and how it applied even to him who is the chiefest of all sinners]: This is a faithful saying, and worthy of all acceptation, that Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners; of whom I am chief.
- [Paul, speaking again of mercy]: Howbeit for this cause I obtained mercy, that in me first Jesus Christ might shew forth all longsuffering, for a pattern to them which should hereafter believe on him to life everlasting.
It's a good idea to look at the context of Scripture so as to not get the wrong idea.
Paul spoke of how Jesus showed forth the benefit of his longsuffering in him first, as a pattern for them which should hereafter believe on him (Jesus) to life everlasting. This is not Paul saying that the sanctification of the Lord failed or that his sin (being a blasphemer, and a persecutor, and injurious to others) was tolerated or allowed to continue. It did qualify him to say that he has witnessed his own hands doing these types of things, but there is no bragging going and he is especially not saying that sin should continue, or as Paul would say, "heaven forbid!"
Perhaps your teaching encompasses these thoughts already and my thought is unneeded, I can not say. Sometimes I merely think that the emphasis on what has been said is misplaced and if that is the case here, kindly forgive me my presumption. All sin is utterly sinful because it crosses purpose with the Holy One, our Father in heaven who says, "Be thou holy, for I am holy."
Up to you. Good to hear this, and I would ask the Lord to give you a "feel" for your audience so that their needs are met (and also trust this is your desire as well). Said frankly, no guile.Your are correct. I am taking what you said as a given. Maybe I should not?
Job 32:9 says, "The abundant in years may not be wise." Just because you've been a Christian a long time doesn't mean you're not a baby. All spiritual babies don't become spiritual young men, they don't become spiritual fathers. They should but they don't. They should grow in grace and in the knowledge of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ, 2 Peter 3:18. They should grow up into the measure of the stature of the fullness of Christ. They should feed on the Word and grow by it, as Peter wrote. But not all do. And at any given point in time, even those who will grow are so new in the faith they haven't started to really develop yet. So there's...there's just the categories here with no implications other than that great implication that immaturity isn't equal to being unconverted.
Hi Mountain Man and welcome to CF.net. Interestingly the world always sees what they desire to see. Even Jesus was judged below and we'll fare no better. I actually believe what you describe fits the image of many Christians not dedicated to a personal walk with our Lord, and we'll know them by their fruits. Matthew 7:16.If anyone is interested in how "they" view us go to youtube and type in "preacher and see what comes up and read the comments...Church discipline in non existent and everyone is called a brother or sister in Christ no matter what they say or do.
The world see's the smiling feel-good types raking in money and living in mansions and flying on private jets to "services" while staying in 5 star luxury suites and calls the whole thing a fraud...useless arguments over non essentials is one thing but when when it comes to how "they" see us there is a little more to it than that.
The problem is, a person with a defiled conscience can find something wrong with anything, so that you're damned if you do and damned if you don't. While I care what people think of me for Christ's sake, I don't care what people think of me for the devil's sake.Or put another way we seem to be very concerned with some aspects of our image while displaying little if any concern over other aspects of our image.
I agree with what you say. We are not called upon to be popular is for sure. I find that people respect others who don't patronize them. It is the responsibility of the one who sees to have the more patience than the one who doesn't see. As you say, the "outsiders" should sense Love when dealing with the "insiders".Yes a person with a defiled conscience can find something wrong with anything, the problem is when what is wrong is plain for all to see and no effort is required to see it apart from a desire to see it and discernment to recognize it and the courage to confront and expose it....the truth is not popular and one can be hated for saying it regardless of how it is said. The question here is how do outsiders view us, there is only one biblical way for them to view us and that is that we display both the love of Jesus and the righteousness of Jesus, if focus only on the righteousness we will come off as judgmental, if we only focus on the love then it it is likely we will be of little effect other than helping somebody to have a nice day which in light of eternity doesn't count for much...."outsiders" should have a balanced view of us and know that we actually stand for something.
Considering today's world view, I'd say we're probably seen as the "outsiders"...
sad.
I think this is a good thing. I think the church and Christianity was at its best when it had no political power