What I teach is not my doctrine, it is Paul's doctrine. Paul said the law promotes sin,
Romans 7:8. Your problem is not with me, your problem is with Paul. I am not going to waste my time trying to convince you that Paul is right. To be under the law or subject to it is to be under the curse,
Galatians 3:10. Enjoy your curse.
If you are so right then why are you robotically avoiding the verses that contradict your understanding of Paul, I notice you rarely if ever address a comment directly just repeat what you've said like your talking to yourself.
You haven't addressed the contradiction of your
eisegesis of Paul compared to "
Romans 13:1-5,
Romans 3:31,
John 14:21,
Galatians 3:21,
Matthew 5:17-19".
You haven't addressed how can the law be God's nature and character and at the same time promote sin?
You haven't addressed the commentaries which show the real meaning of Romans 7:8
According to versebyversecommentary:
"The principle here is that, if there is no law, then there is no transgression. Transgression is the crossing of a line or standard set up by God. A person can sin but, if there is no law prohibiting that sin, there is no crossing of a standard, even God’s norms. No one can have responsibility for a violation if there is no extant law that forbids it. Until God gave the law 500 years after Abraham, there was no transgression.
Ro 5:13, (For until the law sin was in the world, but sin is
not imputed when there is no law.
“No transgression” does not mean there is no sin. The idea here is simply that a transgression is the
basis for annulling God’s promise. God cannot fulfill His promise if those to whom He made the promise come short of the promise by keeping the law.
Sin occurred before the law, but it was not a transgression because there was no
extant standard to prohibit it. Again, the law made sin sinful."
Bibleref.com
"This is not meant to be understood to mean those not under the law have never sinned. Everyone has sinned (
Romans 3:23), and has done so without any valid excuse (
Romans 1:18–20). Paul simply means that those who are not under the law have not broken the law, specifically."
You haven't addressed "And when you assert to no laws rules or religion, are you saying you are free to sin and do whatever you want or that the working power of the Holy Spirit through faith will wipe sin from our lives?
Do you believe in the need to deny ourselves, take up our cross, and follow Jesus?
And you believe the Gospel's were written under the law, where is that mentioned in Scripture? And even so they are also God breathed like the whole Bible (
2 Timothy 3:16-17) you can't cherry picked verses that support your doctrine and reject others that don't."
What you're doing and what others have pointed out is that you're twisting Scripture to support you're overarching theology of faith/no works salvation, which you have a crooked
eisegesis of Paul, which contradicts other passages of Scripture, but your pride refuses for you to admit that.
The book of James also contradicts your entire foundation of your personally altered theology. You can say it was written under the law (which you have zero evidence for than your opinion) but 2 Timothy 3:16-17 contradicts your view that James, or any passage of the Bible that contradicts your thesis isn't usable.
Revelation 22:18-19 "18 I warn everyone who hears the words of the prophecy of this scroll: If anyone
adds anything to them,
God will add to that person the plagues described in this scroll. 19 And if anyone
takes words away from this scroll of prophecy,
God will take away from that person any share in the tree of life and in the Holy City, which are described in this scroll.
Using Scripture to justify your own theology is were things get dangerous. But enjoy to your own expense.