Well to be quite honest he's basically right.
The love languages concept isn't something scientific or so. It's just some individual subjective observation combined with some common sense thinking that were cobbled together in a theoretical construct that gained popularity because it's an important issue and that construct makes sense on an intuitive level, and has probably helped lots of couples and individuals improve their communication. So it's not really a bad concept. It's some of the best stuff the Christian self-help market has to offer. (It's just not really science.) :biggrin
Trying to understand how people communicate friendliness and affection and how different people do it in a different way (and thus may horribly misunderstand each other) is a very important thing to deal with in any meaningful relationship - marriage, friendship, co-workers, whatever, hence the popularity of the Love Languages concept.
But for anyone who is somehow involved in scientific psychology it's obvious that the Five Love Languages concept doesn't suffice to describe and analyse the real complexity of human behaviour communication. There aren't only five distinct ways. And we don't have only one or two of those five. Each of us can probably use a variety of complex and mixed ways to show love, and which we chose depends on situational factors (like who are we showing our love? and in what surroundings are we?) and which would be near imposible to classify in only five subgroups. You might some need some nasty multi-dimensional factor model to describe it... eh I'll spare you the details of that.
Why am I saying that?
Well the Love Languages thing isn't some absolute truth. It's not something that is carved in stone. It's a gross oversimplification - though a somewhat helpful one - of human behaviour. Don't be overly obsessed with feeding it to your husband. Take it for what it is - a crutch to help you understand yourself - but accept that others aren't as convinced of it as you are.
That being said, I think your husband is being a sexist douchebag if he thinks that women only regurgitate things other women say and thus things women say aren't important. And it's even more douche-y if that includes the needs of his own wife.
Leaving the Love Languages aside, you could say you feel disrespected because he's not treating you the way you'd want and he's not telling you any good reasons for why he doesn't do things you'd want him to, but still expects and demands respect and sexual gratification from you?
If it's really some men-women issue he has then maybe another man he respects could show him how poorly he treats you (like, some church elder or some male friend of his and yours?) That's a poor solution because he *should* be respecting you regardless of gender, so asking another male to talk to him shouldn't be necessary. But maybe he needs someone else that has some role model authority to tell him that he's doing you wrong.
Another way to deal with his sexism would be to remove him from the sole provider role. So unless you have little kids that need your attention all day you could find a job yourself. That'd give you more independence and would even out the inequality. You would then have to understand that you're not his house maid.
Now that sentence doesn't make sense to me.... your feelings are real, aren't they. Feelings may be irrational or even inappropriate, but they are real because you feel them?