• Love God, and love one another!

    Share your heart for Christ and others in Godly Love

    https://christianforums.net/forums/god_love/

  • Wake up and smell the coffee!

    Join us for a little humor in Joy of the Lord

    https://christianforums.net/forums/humor_and_jokes/

  • Want to discuss private matters, or make a few friends?

    Ask for membership to the Men's or Lady's Locker Rooms

    For access, please contact a member of staff and they can add you in!

  • Need prayer and encouragement?

    Come share your heart's concerns in the Prayer Forum

    https://christianforums.net/forums/prayer/

  • Desire to be a vessel of honor unto the Lord Jesus Christ?

    Join Hidden in Him and For His Glory for discussions on how

    https://christianforums.net/threads/become-a-vessel-of-honor-part-2.112306/

  • Have questions about the Christian faith?

    Come ask us what's on your mind in Questions and Answers

    https://christianforums.net/forums/questions-and-answers/

  • CFN has a new look and a new theme

    "I bore you on eagle's wings, and brought you to Myself" (Exodus 19:4)

    More new themes coming in the future!

  • Read the Gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ?

    Read through this brief blog, and receive eternal salvation as the free gift of God

    /blog/the-gospel

  • Focus on the Family

    Strengthening families through biblical principles.

    Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.

I Have the Solution!

So the people who own this company are retired teachers, firemen, working folks who buy stocks over he internet, people who work in baggage at Boeing and take advantage of stock offered to them. It's a company owned by working people, retired people, wealthy people, middle income people and possibly poor people.

Those people pay taxes on the profits the company makes for them. Those profits are reported on their income tax form.
Boeing is a corporate person.
 
What loophones are you talking about? Can you give me the actual tax code?
Not willing to go much further with you on this. Need to study for my final in Macro Economics this weekend. I've made my point, no need to belabor it.

I think that the 10% Knotical Tax would need to be applied across the board and include "corporate persons" for it to be feasible. Your point about EIC benefits (to which you've not replied) is like comparing less than 9 thimblefuls of benefit to a whole truckload of benefit.

Regarding my ability (which you seem to question) I actually can provide tax code (or links to it) but then again, you could look for yourself too. I have worked as a certified tax adviser (volunteer) at my campus (under the direction of my Accounting Professor, a qualified CPA professional, licensed tax consultant, and lawyer) as part of my fall quarter 2012 curriculum. That's not really saying much, just helped people fill out their forms, but it was enough to give me an idea about how truly complex your question is (as if you didn't know).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Corporations exist to serve their shareholders so when they generate profits, they can either put those profits to work making my actual stock worth more or they can pay it out in distributions meaning it goes into my hands and I work myself.


The more you tax a corporation the less money/wealth the individual ends up with.

It's just a game to say tax the corporation when in reality it's shareholders (people) who own are going to end up without the money. (or the consumers/both)

In the end all taxes are paid by people.
 
Quoting a previously linked article, "Haves and have nots"
Corporate taxes as a percentage of the U.S. Gross Domestic Product decreased from 7.2% in 1945 to 1.3% in 2010 -- while profits increased from nearly nothing in 1945 to $1.8 trillion in 2010. At the same time individuals paid a 42.3% share of tax revenue in 2010 while corporation paid 7.2% -- source, Seattle Times, Feb. 23, 2012.

Wells Fargo, At&T, Verizon, General Electric, IBM, Exxon Mobile and Boeing together got tax breaks totaling just under $70 billion between 2008 and 2010, the Seattle Times reported on Feb. 23, 2012.

Some superwealthy lashed out at protests against the greed of the richest 1% -- saying the protesters were imbeciles and calling rules that require companies to disclose the ratio of pay between CEOs and employees "insane," according to the Dec. 21, 2011 Seattle Times, which noted that average U.S. household income increased 62% between 1969 and 2007 -- but income for the top 1% rose more than 300%.

Compensation in fiscal year 2010 for American CEOs increased by a median 27%, according to the Los Angeles Times. CEOs from the S&P 500 took a median 36.5% increase in compensation, the Times said, citing the ninth annual report from the research group GMI.

Paul Krugman noted in November 2011 that all American redistribution of income away from the bottom 80% has gone to the highest-income 1% -- and that a report looking only through 2005 found that almost two-thirds of the rising share of top 1% income went to the top 0.1% (the richests one-thousandth), who saw their income rise more than 400% from 1979 to 2005.

Krugman added that the top 0.1% is not heroic entrepreneurs -- instead, corporate executives, executives in nonfinancial companies (Wall Street executives), lawyers and real estate kings.

"'We are the 99 percent' is a clear message. It is unfair and, in fact, digusting that the American political economy is run for the benefit of a plutocracy. I don't see how that can be misunderstood," said Todd Gitlin (president of the former Students for a Democratic Society in the mid-1960s) at the Occupy Wall Street protest Oct. 5, 2011, according to the Oct. 10 Seattle Times.

Edgar is your friend:

Filings & Forms

All companies, foreign and domestic, are required to file registration statements, periodic reports, and other forms electronically through EDGAR. Anyone can access and download this information for free. Here you'll find links to a complete list of filings available through EDGAR and instructions for searching the EDGAR database.

It is through my personal EDGAR searches that I found that one fine Summer day, about a decade ago, one of my previous employers, Craig Jelinek, now CEO of Costco Wholesale sold part of his holdings to the tune of $30+ million dollars. When I worked with him, Craig was the Warehouse Manager for the SouthCenter Costco. His salary then was approximately 102,000 per year with bonus available to double that amount, and not including stock options where he was allowed to use his full bonus to buy shares at $10 each, without regard to the cost to the general public. Now tell me again how corporations are "owned" by teachers and plumbers. I also "own" shares in Costco, but they didn't cost me $10 each. And I didn't buy them with "bonus" monies provided by the corporation.

Notice that Craig has only recently been promoted to CEO and he was merely a "Regional Officer" on that fine summer's day.
Craig-Jelinek-_zps16b87481.jpg


By the way, I like him! He's the best boss I've ever had, bar none. Is he richer than me? Not in the long run, no. I'm like Moses in that manner because the wealth of all of Egypt is like nothing (less than 9 thimblefuls) in comparison to the vast riches found in Christ. Period.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Boeing is a corporate person.
The big companies, such as Boeing just got a BIG surprise. With the addition of Obamacare, companies - Boeing - must pay $68 per employee, and they have over 400,000 employees which equates to about 25 million ADDITIONAL monies going to the Federal Government in the form of taxes, specifically for Ocare.
 
Quoting a previously linked article, "Haves and have nots"


And those people were sent K-9's, W-2's and 1999 that reported all their earings and they were taxed on that money.
 
The big companies, such as Boeing just got a BIG surprise. With the addition of Obamacare, companies - Boeing - must pay $68 per employee, and they have over 400,000 employees which equates to about 25 million ADDITIONAL monies going to the Federal Government in the form of taxes, specifically for Ocare.

Meaning thanks to Obamacare we pay more for airline tickets and for any item that had to be transported by plane. Those taxes ARE passed down to people.
 
It is through my personal EDGAR searches that I found that one fine Summer day, about a decade ago, one of my previous employers, Craig Jelinek, now CEO of Costco Wholesale sold part of his holdings to the tune of $30+ million dollars. When I worked with him, Craig was the Warehouse Manager for the SouthCenter Costco. His salary then was approximately 102,000 per year with bonus available to double that amount, and not including stock options where he was allowed to use his full bonus to buy shares at $10 each, without regard to the cost to the general public. Now tell me again how corporations are "owned" by teachers and plumbers. I also "own" shares in Costco, but they didn't cost me $10 each. And I didn't buy them with "bonus" monies provided by the corporation.

Great for him! Isn't this country wonderful!

My cousin went to work for Lowes Corp. right out of high school as a gunt worker. (loaded up the merchandise for customers) He was given a simular type stock option deal. He quit working when his Lowes stock was worth a few million. He sold out and now works on the mission field as a self supported missionary.
 
Meaning thanks to Obamacare we pay more for airline tickets and for any item that had to be transported by plane. Those taxes ARE passed down to people.

This will be one issue the customers will have to deal with, we not only have increased payroll taxes due to our government not being able to reduce spending and negligence on their part, but we will need to deal with greater and higher unemployment rates as the smaller companies will not hire and/or they will decrease the number of hours an employee works. Right now Obama is trying to changing full time status to 30 hours, this is not a federal gov't issue, it is a company issue and they should be able to make that decision.

The second issue America will need to deal with is the big companies leaving our country. Microsoft has already hired mostly India workers and is increasing their employees over seas. Google just built a brand new corporate office in Canada. The companies are being taxed right out of our country because our government does not see the value in them. Government decisions are and will destroy America in the future, for generations and generations to come. I doubt if America will ever be the same with all the damage done over the past 4 years.
 
And those people were sent K-9's, W-2's and 1999 that reported all their earings and they were taxed on that money.
So none of them have trusts? Really? Know this do you?

Last quarter I attended a lecture given by a tax attorney specializing in “income-tax planning,” showing how to set up an irrevocable trust to protect his clients' assets from Uncle Sam. He serves the wealthy and looked to be pretty well off himself. This quarter I gave a presentation about how retirees need to look at the several rules of thumb and concentrate on the FED's statement regarding Bonds; how they plan on keeping the near-zero rates until unemployment drops.

The nut of it can be summarized by thinking about the rule of thumb where you subtract your age from 100 and are told to invest that percentage into Stocks with the remainder going toward Bonds. Retirees who reach 67+ and have followed that advice will have more than 65% of their investment portfolio distributed into the bond market.

The idea is to start saving and investing while young and shift toward less risk as one ages. The problem that will be seen is when it comes time to start withdrawals, and retirees have been told to expect to be able to take 4% of their nest egg out as income. So 4% withdrawal from $100,000 is $4,000 per year. Retirees are told that they have a 90% chance of still having money when they die if they begin their withdrawals at 4% and increase to pace with inflation. But with lower returns on bonds (which they are heavy in) the real percentage that will still have money left over is reduced to 50%. That's a coin-flips chance of not going broke. To bring that percentage back to the healthy 90% range, the withdrawal amount would need to be reduced to 2.8%.

Most retirees who hear that figure would look at me like I had two heads. Even with "frugal" spending and investment plans, how would you expect one to live on that? And what will happen during the next generation? Or two?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
This will be one issue the customers will have to deal with, we not only have increased payroll taxes due to our government not being able to reduce spending and negligence on their part, but we will need to deal with greater and higher unemployment rates as the smaller companies will not hire and/or they will decrease the number of hours an employee works. Right now Obama is trying to changing full time status to 30 hours, this is not a federal gov't issue, it is a company issue and they should be able to make that decision.

The second issue America will need to deal with is the big companies leaving our country. Microsoft has already hired mostly India workers and is increasing their employees over seas. Google just built a brand new corporate office in Canada. The companies are being taxed right out of our country because our government does not see the value in them. Government decisions are and will destroy America in the future, for generations and generations to come. I doubt if America will ever be the same with all the damage done over the past 4 years.

IF the Government tell employers 30 hour week in now full time . the employer can cut hours to 20 hours and hire a second person then the jobless rate will go down.... :)
 
So none of them have trusts? Really? Know this do you?

Last quarter I attended a lecture given by a tax attorney specializing in “income-tax planning,” showing how to set up an irrevocable trust to protect his clients' assets from Uncle Sam. He serves the wealthy and looked to be pretty well off himself.

My guess would be most all of them have trust. Most of my peers do as well. That does not mean we don't pay taxes.

BTW, most tax attorney's I know are wealthy. Then hold both law degrees and are CPA's. They went to school for a long time and are sharp!
 
most politicians are lawyers .. sorta like the fox watching the hen house...
 
IF the Government tell employers 30 hour week in now full time . the employer can cut hours to 20 hours and hire a second person then the jobless rate will go down.... :)
There you have it! Perfect solution. ;)

Now we can tell all those unemployed there's a job waiting for them around the corner, surely it's enough to raise a family on.

I think the trend is already headed that way.
 
most politicians are lawyers .. sorta like the fox watching the hen house...
I'm reminded of a proverb that I may have read or may have made up (I dunno). But it goes like this: "They have tyrants above them, double minded on their right..." Our lawmakers have law degrees (or staff advisers with degrees for the few that don't have degrees themselves), and that only makes sense, right? People who earn these degrees are taught how to argue for either side of the position according to their client need. So we have those who have been trained in duplicity above us, and who do we have as our trusted advisers on the right? Who whispers into the ear? Look no further than mass media and television and your favorite movies and magazines for the source of the "whisper" for most.

swirley1_zps6f4bd03d.jpg


Who makes the laws? Where do we get the brain washed? What about communities that would look among themselves and choose those who have lived good lives, who eschew evil and hold fast to the truth? Could we have some of them over us or as our trusted counselors? Would they oppress the poor and give benefit to themselves? Would they take bribes? I guess the first thing to do would be to find them; that could be difficult. Good thing that the Lord who is perfect is involved moreso than I.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
More from that article (wish I wasn't reading such depressing news)
Large-company CEOs, on average, earn 500 times more than the average worker, the Seattle P-I reported Feb. 1, 2007 -- in 1980, CEO salaries were only 42 times greater.

Now, the nation's 10 highest paid CEOs make $154 million a year as opposed to the $3.5 million made by the top 10 in 1981.

In 1974, the average CEO made 34 times as much as a production or non-supervisor worker.

In 1990, it was 96 times as much.

In 2000, it was 458 times as much.

The average CEO of a major corporation makes $13.1 million a year in compensation (about $36,000 a day).

An estimated 61 percent of U.S. corporations paid no federal taxes between 1996 and 2000.
 
Yep we live in a wonderful country where a poor immigrant can become a billionaire!
You are not agreeing with me when you try to put words into my mouth. What poor immigrant in the last couple decades has done this? Is the "American Dream" still real for today? And how does that relate back to the failure to tax the rich?

A small businessman from the old country kept his accounts payable in a cigar box, his accounts receivable on a spindle, and his cash in the cash register. One day his son said to him, "I don't see how you can run your business this way. How do you know what your profits are?" The businessman replied, "Son, when I got off the boat, I had only the pants I was wearing. Today your sister is an art teacher, your brother is a fine doctor, and you're an accountant. I have a car, a decent place to live, and a good business. I don't owe a thing to anyone. So you add it all up, subtract the pants, and there's your profit."

That businessman represents something of what it meant at one time to achieve the American Dream. But today the American Dream has come to mean something different, having more to do with an unhealthy over-concentration on the material. Bruce L. Shelly in his book, The Gospel and the American Dream, described it this way:
"Today the magnetic 'good life,' out there in the future, includes a four bedroom house in suburbia, at least two late-model cars, four weeks of vacation, the toys to go with it, and an income adequate for the payments. The happiness Americans crave is supposed to come with the independent lifestyle that allows us to do what we really want to do."
Read more at http://www.christianpost.com/news/restore-the-real-american-dream-80834/#EUdlD0X5kXWIE2rS.99
 
Back
Top