You and I know both know that the Catholic church says if a person does not submit to the rituals that the Catholic church says makes a person a child of God then they are not a child of God.A slanderous lie.
Join For His Glory for a discussion on how
https://christianforums.net/threads/a-vessel-of-honor.110278/
https://christianforums.net/threads/psalm-70-1-save-me-o-god-lord-help-me-now.108509/
Strengthening families through biblical principles.
Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.
Read daily articles from Focus on the Family in the Marriage and Parenting Resources forum.
You and I know both know that the Catholic church says if a person does not submit to the rituals that the Catholic church says makes a person a child of God then they are not a child of God.A slanderous lie.
Thank youIt's important to this topic because the OP was rejected because the Catholic church thinks she's not a child of God. Their doctrine about what makes a person a child of God is wrong. She needs to know this. If she believes that she is forgiven by having faith in God's forgiveness she is a child of God and NO ONE can deny her participation in a Passover observance.
Yes, problems come in when one does not make the distinction between 'saved' as in becoming a saved person, and 'saved' as in being delivered from the wrath of God at the end of the age.Depends what one means by SAVED.
I spent a lot of time explaining this to the other member. I see that it's a waste of time.
The CC did not deny the OP for the reason you state.It's important to this topic because the OP was rejected because the Catholic church thinks she's not a child of God. Their doctrine about what makes a person a child of God is wrong. She needs to know this. If she believes that she is forgiven by having faith in God's forgiveness she is a child of God and NO ONE can deny her participation in a Passover observance.
I was identified as non-Catholic. What difference does it make how I was so identified?The CC did not deny the OP for the reason you state.
I asked her an important question in post 6 to which she did not reply. Apparently, she knows why she was refused but wished to make an issue of it instead.
Your hatred of the CC is unchristianly.
It even goes against Romans 14, which you posted.
I'm not getting into this with you again, I just want to say that you're talking about initial salvation and Mungo is talking about continual salvation.
You should stop spreading lies about the CC.
Oh.Yes, problems come in when one does not make the distinction between 'saved' as in becoming a saved person, and 'saved' as in being delivered from the wrath of God at the end of the age.
One does not need to perform a ritual or work to become a saved person. That happens entirely on the basis of one's faith in the Promise, just as that was true for Abraham, our example of justification by faith apart from works. But surely you can't be saved at the end of the age if you do not have the works that accompany and are motivated by genuine faith. Works summarized in the command to 'love your neighbor as yourself'.
I asked you if the C of E believes the host is the body and blood of Jesus.I was identified as non-Catholic. What difference does it make how I was so identified?
In our Lutheran church we do the same thing for those that choose not to receive, however, we do not deny the Eucharist in Holy Communion to anyone simply because they are not members of the Lutheran church. This is not the case with all Lutheran churches. The Lutheran Church Missouri Synod does restrict reception of the Eucharist strictly to LCMS members. Jesus said to "Do this in remembrance of Me." At the time He made this proclamation there was no such thing as a Catholic church, Missouri Synod or any other denomination and I know of nowhere in Scripture where He added, "but only if you are a member of such and such denomination."In our church, before communion, the priest invites those that are not eligible to receive communion - a child or
because they are not a Catholic, or Catholics who for some personal reason do not wish to receive communion - to come forward for a blessing. They indicate this by crossing their arms over their chests.
There's a reason why non catholics should not receive communion in a catholic church.In our Lutheran church we do the same thing, however, we do not deny participation in Holy Communion to believers or non Lutherans. This is not the case with all Lutheran churches. The LCMS or Lutheran Church Missouri Synod does not allow non members to participate in Holy Communion. Jesus said to "Do this in remembrance of Me." At the time He made this proclamation there was no such thing as a Catholic church, Missouri Synod or any other denomination and I know of nowhere in Scripture where He added, "but only if you are a member of such and such denomination."
I know there's a Catholic reason or explanation and likewise the LCMS but whether or not it is in line with what Christ intended is questionable.There's a reason why non catholics should not receive communion in a catholic church.
I'm discovering that it's not worth debating since those that bring up this topic just want to argue and do not care to learn anything about the CC.
Jesus didn't know His church would be splintered into hundreds of denominations.I know there's a Catholic reason or explanation and likewise the LCMS but whether or not it is in line with what Christ intended is questionable.
Yes. We are not loved by Jesus like Catholics are.There's a reason why non catholics should not receive communion in a catholic church.
I'm discovering that it's not worth debating since those that bring up this topic just want to argue and do not care to learn anything about the CC.
Two hours is not required.Oh.
You think I'm spending another couple of hours on this?
No way.
No further comment.Yes. We are not loved by Jesus like Catholics are.
Don't matter J.Two hours is not required.
If people would just understand that there is being saved as in becoming a saved person and being saved as in being delivered from the wrath of God. It's really just that simple. But it is important that one make clear which one they are talking about.
Surely you know that what he calls 'faith alone' (actually, it's 'apart from works' so as not to confuse it with James' teaching) is in the context of justification and 'initial salvation' as you call it. So he was not talking about 'continual salvation'. I will unabashedly and unapologetically resist any argument that says a man is 'initially saved' by anything more than faith all by itself. Justification is how one becomes a saved person, and justification is entirely on the basis of having faith in the Promise of God all by itself apart from works, just as that was true for Abraham our example of justification by faith apart fromf works.I'm not getting into this with you again, I just want to say that you're talking about initial salvation and @Mungo is talking about continual salvation.
I do not hate Catholics. I hate Catholic doctrine.Don't matter J.
You hate the CC too much.
Hate is murder.
Matthew 5
Who cares what you think they teach?Surely you know that what he calls 'faith alone' (actually, it's 'apart from works' so as not to confuse it with James' teaching) is in the context of justification and 'initial salvation' as you call it. So he was not talking about 'continual salvation'. I will unabashedly and unapologetically resist any argument that says a man is 'initially saved' by anything more than faith all by itself. Justification is how one becomes a saved person, and justification is entirely on the basis of having faith in the Promise of God all by itself apart from works, just as that was true for Abraham our example of justification by faith apart fromf works.
Hate has the same nature as murder.I do not hate Catholics. I hate Catholic doctrine.