- Dec 11, 2010
- 15,325
- 8,300
We've had a few discussions about baptism by water vs baptism by the Holy Spirit and whether or not water baptism is required or important. I was reading through Acts 10 this morning where Peter preached to Cornelius and his household. What caught my attention was the turn of events and the order in which they occurred. I thought I'd post here in the Lounge because I don't wish to debate it but just wanted to share it for what it's worth. I found it interesting that even after receiving the Holy Spirit, Peter commanded that they all be baptized with water.
While Peter was still speaking these words, the Holy Spirit fell upon all those who heard the word. And those of the circumcision who believed were astonished, as many as came with Peter, because the gift of the Holy Spirit had been poured out on the Gentiles also. For they heard them speak with tongues and magnify God. Then Peter answered, “Can anyone forbid water, that these should not be baptized who have received the Holy Spirit just as we have?” And he commanded them to be baptized in the name of the Lord. Then they asked him to stay a few days. Acts 10:44-48 NKJV
Just food for thought.
While Peter was still speaking these words, the Holy Spirit fell upon all those who heard the word. And those of the circumcision who believed were astonished, as many as came with Peter, because the gift of the Holy Spirit had been poured out on the Gentiles also. For they heard them speak with tongues and magnify God. Then Peter answered, “Can anyone forbid water, that these should not be baptized who have received the Holy Spirit just as we have?” And he commanded them to be baptized in the name of the Lord. Then they asked him to stay a few days. Acts 10:44-48 NKJV
Just food for thought.