• Love God, and love one another!

    Share your heart for Christ and others in Godly Love

    https://christianforums.net/forums/god_love/

  • Want to discuss private matters, or make a few friends?

    Ask for membership to the Men's or Lady's Locker Rooms

    For access, please contact a member of staff and they can add you in!

  • Wake up and smell the coffee!

    Join us for a little humor in Joy of the Lord

    https://christianforums.net/forums/humor_and_jokes/

  • Need prayer and encouragement?

    Come share your heart's concerns in the Prayer Forum

    https://christianforums.net/forums/prayer/

  • Desire to be a vessel of honor unto the Lord Jesus Christ?

    Join Hidden in Him and For His Glory for discussions on how

    https://christianforums.net/threads/become-a-vessel-of-honor-part-2.112306/

  • Have questions about the Christian faith?

    Come ask us what's on your mind in Questions and Answers

    https://christianforums.net/forums/questions-and-answers/

  • CFN has a new look and a new theme

    "I bore you on eagle's wings, and brought you to Myself" (Exodus 19:4)

    More new themes coming in the future!

  • Read the Gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ?

    Read through this brief blog, and receive eternal salvation as the free gift of God

    /blog/the-gospel

  • Focus on the Family

    Strengthening families through biblical principles.

    Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.

Is Peter the foundation of the church?

stranger said:
Some texts referred to so far in this tread:

Matt 16: 15-20 concerning Peter - confession, rock, church and keys. . .
1 Peter 2: 4-10 Living stones. . .metaphors
1 Cor 3:2-23 Mere men . . .
Rom 11: 1-36 jews and gentiles the church/Israel at
the beginning and end of the age. . .
Eph 2: 10-32, 4:1-24 foundation of the apostles and prophets. . .
Matt20: 20-28 sitting at Jesus' right and left hand

Summary Statement

1Cor3:8b' . . .each man will receive his own reward according to his own labour'

Each Apostle Peter, James, John and Paul etc have received their reward for their own labour. Each operated with and within the measure of faith given them. All have contributed to 'building the church' and all were chosen to be Apostles by God. On the basis of the work of the 'apostles and prophets' the foundation of the church was laid.

Which speaks a bit on why Christ choose 12, (including Judas who betrayed him, whose contribution was negative, yet God used him that the purpose of Jesus' coming on earth would be fulfilled.)

The 'keys of the kingdom' is a unique 'distinctive' that was given to Peter. Little wonder that Satan wanted 'to sift him as wheat'. As a Protestant I am not at liberty to deny this distinctive as found in scripture - lest somehow I have missed where the Cornerstone was laid.

In Christ: Stranger

A thoughful conclusion that is rare among non-Catholics I have encountered in all forums I have been active in. You are not far from the truth, my friend. :)

I want to take this opportunity to thank francisdesales, who more or less took over in my absense. I got quite busy in another forum that I kinda neglected this one!
:smt040

I wish all of you here a most wonderful and fulfilled Christmas celebration with the birth of the Christ child which is upon us.

Oh and a Happy New Year to all of you as well... :smilecolros:

God bless,

PAX

Bill+†+


O Jesus! meek and humble of heart, hear me.
From the desire of being esteemed,
From the desire of being loved,
From the desire of being extolled,
From the desire of being honored,
From the desire of being praised,
From the desire of being preferred,
From the desire of being consulted,
From the desire of being approved,
Deliver me, Jesus.
From the fear of being humiliated,
From the fear of being despised,
From the fear of being rebuked,
From the fear of being calumniated,
From the fear of being forgotten,
From the fear of being ridiculed,
From the fear of being wronged,
From the fear of being suspected,
Deliver me, Jesus.
That others may be loved more than I,
That others may be esteemed more than I,
That in the opinion of the world, others may
increase, and I may decrease.
That others may be chosen and I set aside,
That others may be praised and I unnoticed,
That others may be preferred to me in everything,
That others become holier than I , provided that
I may become as holy as I should,
Jesus, grant me the grace to desire it.'


Cardinal Merry del Val
 
Red Beetle,

Your entire argument is based on a red herring. You merely attack the strawman that you have erected, not my argument. As a result, you are speaking to the wind, not my particular posts. Clearly in your own post, you admit that words have different meanings, which of course makes your whole argument moot.

Yes, you are free to post what you like on your tagline. I never said you couldn't! I thoroughly enjoy speaking with my brother Protestants on these subjects. However, if you choose to continue to insult me, then I cannot in good conscience respond directly to your posts as brother to brother, except to say they are false and have nothing to do with what I have said.

Regards just the same.
 
francisdesales said:
Your entire argument is based on a red herring. You merely attack the strawman that you have erected, not my argument. As a result, you are speaking to the wind, not my particular posts. Clearly in your own post, you admit that words have different meanings, which of course makes your whole argument moot.

Ah, francisdesales, may I make a suggestion?

I have no idea who you are talking too! ;)

Please give the name of the individual, or quote some of his post you are responding to, like I did yours here.

new_smilie_colors1.gif


God bless,

PAX

Bill+†+


Hail, O you, through whom Joy will shine forth!
Hail, O you, through whom the curse will disappear!
Hail, O Restoration of the Fallen Adam!
Hail, O Redemption of the Tears of Eve!
Hail, O Peak above the reach of human thought!
Hail, O Depth even beyond the sight of angels!
Hail, O you who have become a Kingly Throne!
Hail, O you who carry Him Who Carries All!
Hail, O Star who manifest the Sun!
Hail, O Womb of the Divine Incarnation!
Hail, O you through whom creation is renewed!
Hail, O you through whom the Creator becomes a Babe!
Hail, O Bride and Maiden ever-pure!
 
To use one text in the bible to base one’s whole theology on, is not the way to study any given subject, or topic. This is so true with Jesus’ statement purporting that Peter is the rock in Matthew 16:18. Which Christ would build his church upon.

In scripture, when “Rock†is used, it is a synonym for God. To illustrate:

Ex 17:6 I will stand there before you by the rock at Horeb. Strike the rock, and water will come out of it for the people to drink.†So Moses did this in the sight of the elders of Israel.

Notice how the NT interprets this incident:

1Co 10:2 They were all baptized into Moses in the cloud and in the sea.
1Co 10:3 They all ate the same spiritual food
1Co 10:4 and drank the same spiritual drink; for they drank from the spiritual rock that accompanied them, and that rock was Christ.

Dt 32:3 I will proclaim the name of the LORD. Oh, praise the greatness of our God!
Dt 32:4 He is the Rock, his works are perfect, and all his ways are just. A faithful God who does no wrong, upright and just is he.

Dt 32:15 Jeshurun 3 grew fat and kicked; filled with food, he became heavy and sleek. He abandoned the God who made him and rejected the Rock his Savior.

1 Samuel 2:2 There is no one holy like the LORD; there is no one besides you; there is no Rock like our God.
David says:

Ps 18:2 The LORD is my rock, my fortress and my deliverer; my God is my rock, in whom I take refuge, my shield 1 and the horn 2 of my salvation, my stronghold. Ps 18:31 For who is God besides the LORD? And who is the Rock except our God? Ps 18:46 The LORD lives! Praise be to my Rock! Exalted be God my Savior!

Jesus is the eternal Rock

Isa 26:4 Trust in the LORD forever, for the LORD, the LORD, is the Rock eternal.

The Christian Church is based fully on Christ the solid rock. As the old hymn says: “On Christ the solid Rock I stand, all other ground is sinking sand.â€Â

Also I notice that no one has picked up on the last part of the text:
“And the gates of Hades will not overcome it.â€Â

Question: did the gates of Hades overcome Peter (rock)?
It certainly did. Peter is still dead.

Did the gates of Hades overcome Christ the Rock?
No, because the grave could not contain Him, for he rose of the third day, and we serve a living Saviour.

God Bless
Gazzamor
 
gazzamor said:
To use one text in the bible to base one’s whole theology on, is not the way to study any given subject, or topic. This is so true with Jesus’ statement purporting that Peter is the rock in Matthew 16:18. Which Christ would build his church upon.

Then would you please give me your exegesis of what Jesus is saying here in Matthew 16:18-19.

In scripture, when “Rock†is used, it is a synonym for God. To illustrate:

Ex 17:6 I will stand there before you by the rock at Horeb. Strike the rock, and water will come out of it for the people to drink.†So Moses did this in the sight of the elders of Israel.

Are you saying that the rock at Horeb is God? Is the staff which Moses held high that the Red Sea would part God as well? :)

Notice how the NT interprets this incident:

1Co 10:2 They were all baptized into Moses in the cloud and in the sea.
1Co 10:3 They all ate the same spiritual food
1Co 10:4 and drank the same spiritual drink; for they drank from the spiritual rock that accompanied them, and that rock was Christ.

That’s better! :)

But now that we read this in your quotes above, does it now prevent me from using the excellent metaphor, which “rock†is, that I cannot use that same metaphor to described another person for the qualities of steadfastness, resolve, strength, endurance and never changing? Could not the same metaphor be used to describe similar qualities we see in Moses, Abraham and the other Old Testament saints?

=Dt 32:3 I will proclaim the name of the LORD. Oh, praise the greatness of our God!
Dt 32:4 He is the Rock, his works are perfect, and all his ways are just. A faithful God who does no wrong, upright and just is he.

Which does not prevent Jesus from changing Simon’s name to Peter (which is rock) and describe him as the very rock (in metaphor) that He will build His church upon?

Dt 32:15 Jeshurun 3 grew fat and kicked; filled with food, he became heavy and sleek. He abandoned the God who made him and rejected the Rock his Savior.

Not the same “rock†as Peter, was he? Peter was centuries from being born, right? :)

1 Samuel 2:2 There is no one holy like the LORD; there is no one besides you; there is no Rock like our God.

Which does not prevent Jesus from using the metaphor of “rock†to describe Simon, now renamed Peter (Rock) that He would build His church upon.

David says:

Ps 18:2 The LORD is my rock, my fortress and my deliverer; my God is my rock, in whom I take refuge, my shield 1 and the horn 2 of my salvation, my stronghold. Ps 18:31 For who is God besides the LORD? And who is the Rock except our God? Ps 18:46 The LORD lives! Praise be to my Rock! Exalted be God my Savior!

He is my ROCK too! But this does not preclude Jesus from renaming Simon as Peter (Rock) and declaring that upon this rock (in metaphor) He will build His church upon.

I am going to say this over and over and over and over until you get it! :)

Jesus is the eternal Rock

Yeppers! Peter is also a rock upon which Jesus built His church!

Isa 26:4 Trust in the LORD forever, for the LORD, the LORD, is the Rock eternal.

amen.gif



The Christian Church is based fully on Christ the solid rock. As the old hymn says: “On Christ the solid Rock I stand, all other ground is sinking sand.â€Â

Not bad at all! But it does not preclude Jesus from declaring Peter as being the rock upon which He builds His church.

Isn’t “rock†a wonderful metaphor to describe anyone who has the attributes I gave above? :)

Also I notice that no one has picked up on the last part of the text:
“And the gates of Hades will not overcome it.â€Â

Not me! I often refer to this part of the text whereby the Church, which Jesus just speaks about, will not fall into error! Christ, through the Holy Spirit, will protect the Church from doctrinal error, despite sinful and individually erring clergy. And that has got to be a miracle in itself!

Question: did the gates of Hades overcome Peter (rock)?
It certainly did. Peter is still dead.

Non sequitur, since Jesus is describing how Hadies will not overcome the Church, not Peter!

“…and upon this rock I will build my church, and the gates of the netherworld shall not prevail against it.â€Â

To what does “it†refer back to? To “church,†of course. :)

As for Peter being dead, please note the successors of Peter down to the present day:

http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/12272b.htm

Peter may be dead, but his immediate successor, Pope Benedict XVI is alive and well! :)

Did the gates of Hades overcome Christ the Rock?
No, because the grave could not contain Him, for he rose of the third day, and we serve a living Saviour.

That is a true statement, but has absolutely nothing at all to do with the issue of Matthew 16:18-19.

As I have already mentioned, you got off track where it is obvious that Hadies will not prevail against the Church Christ established.

pop[1].gif



God bless,

PAX

Bill+†+



Pillar and Foundation of Truth, the Church. (1 Tim 3:15)
 
William - biblically speaking - where does it mention that Peter becomes the "Pope" or that Peter was infalliable in his understanding? Peter was merely like you and me, falliable, human, and sinful.

Also, where does it suggest that the church as mentioned in the Scriptures translates to the "Catholic Church"?
 
aLoneVoice said:
William - biblically speaking - where does it mention that Peter becomes the "Pope" or that Peter was infalliable in his understanding? Peter was merely like you and me, falliable, human, and sinful.

Strictly speaking, scripture doesn't. But it is evident in the leadership role, Christ gives to Peter as "Chief of the Apostles."

See also this interesting link:

http://socrates58.blogspot.com/2006/03/ ... trine.html

Also, where does it suggest that the church as mentioned in the Scriptures translates to the "Catholic Church"?

It does not use the word "Catholic," a word that was first coined by one St. Ignatius, Bishop of Antioch on A.D. 110...

"See that ye all follow the bishop, even as Christ Jesus does the Father, and the presbytery as ye would the apostles. Do ye also reverence the deacons, as those that carry out[through their office] the appointment of God. Let no man do anything connected with the Church without the bishop. Let that be deemed a proper Eucharist, which is[administered] either by the bishop, or by one to whom he has entrusted it. Wherever the bishop shall appear, there let the multitude[of the people] also be; by the bishop, or by one to whom he has entrusted it. Wherever the bishop shall appear, there let the multitude[of the people] also be; even as, wherever Jesus Christ is, there is the Catholic Church."
Ignatius of Antioch, Epistle to the Smyrneans, 8:2(A.D. 110),in ANF,I:89

From the web site:

http://www.cin.org/users/jgallegos/catholic.htm

I suggest you read further in that link and see what the other early church fathers had to say in a time where there was only one Church in existence between Pentecost and about A.D. 1000.

God bless,

PAX

Bill+†+



Give me that REAL old time religion!
The CATHOLIC CHURCH, 2,000 years of history!
 
As someone pointed out in another thread, I tend to be frank - so forgive me if my written words sound harsher than my spoken words would be:

I find it troublesome that 'biblically speaking' you cannot defend a position of Pope or "Chief among the Apostles"

Also, the Roman Catholic church that is in existence today and the term "catholic church" are very two seperate and distinct things.

I am sure that your links present a good case - however, I am not interested in reading apologetics for the Roman Catholic church - but rather apologetics for those things that are biblically grounded.

I am a member of the Mennonite Church denomination - but first and foremost I am a member of The Church - the "called out ones" who has Christ at it's Head. For Christ and Christ lone is infalliable and worthy of reverence.
 
aLoneVoice said:
As someone pointed out in another thread, I tend to be frank - so forgive me if my written words sound harsher than my spoken words would be:

I find it troublesome that 'biblically speaking' you cannot defend a position of Pope or "Chief among the Apostles"

Then I wonder if you read any of my material in my last few posts here.

Also, the Roman Catholic church that is in existence today and the term "catholic church" are very two seperate and distinct things.

Documentation please! :)

I am sure that your links present a good case - however, I am not interested in reading apologetics for the Roman Catholic church - but rather apologetics for those things that are biblically grounded.

Then I suggest you do not read any of my posts them! Sorry but I am going to explain my Catholic Faith whereever I think it needs defending or explanation.

I am a member of the Mennonite Church denomination - but first and foremost I am a member of The Church - the "called out ones" who has Christ at it's Head. For Christ and Christ lone is infalliable and worthy of reverence.

Good for you!

You may be interested in reading what it says about all good Christians:

838 "The Church knows that she is joined in many ways to the baptized who are honored by the name of Christian, but do not profess the Catholic faith in its entirety or have not preserved unity or communion under the successor of Peter." Those "who believe in Christ and have been properly baptized are put in a certain, although imperfect, communion with the Catholic Church." With the Orthodox Churches, this communion is so profound "that it lacks little to attain the fullness that would permit a common celebration of the Lord's Eucharist."

From The Catechism of the Catholic Church.

God bless,

PAX

Bill+†+



Pillar and Foundation of Truth, the Church. (1 Tim 3:15)
 
William,

You just stated that 'scripturally speaking' you cannot prove the office of the Pope - or that Peter was the first one or the infallibility of Peter.

I am interested in Scriptural proof.

The term 'catholic' means universal; broad. I can say that I am a member of the catholic church, but not a member of the Catholic church. They are different.

As a Christian are we not to defend the Christian faith. As a Mennonite, I can explain the Anabaptist practice of living out my Christian faith. I do not understand what a "Catholic" Faith or even a "Mennonite Faith" is. I would also except to explain my Mennonite practice on the basis of Scripture.

And yet, even with the Catechism - us "good Christians" are not able to partake of the ordiance of the Last Supper - as commanded by Christ. The only qualification that the Scriptures places on partaking the Lord Supper is that one is right with God - who is the Catholic Church to deny a believer of partaking?
 
William - biblically speaking - where does it mention that Peter becomes the "Pope" or that Peter was infalliable in his understanding? Peter was merely like you and me, falliable, human, and sinful.


Peter became head of the Church at Pentecost and derived his power from Christ when he said:
Blessed are you, Simon son of Jonah. For flesh and blood has not revealed this to you, but my heavenly Father. And so I say to you, you are Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church, and the gates of the netherworld shall not prevail against it. I will give you the keys to the kingdom of heaven. Whatever you bind on earth shall be bound in heaven; and whatever you loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven." Mat 16:17-19

He is infallible as stated ("whatever you bind..."). The term "pope" arose later but the office was the same. Certainly you are correct to say that Peter was sinful and human but through the Holy Spirit was he not inspired to write two infallible epistle in which God guided his hand? Just because someone is sinful does not mean they cannot be infallible. Christ even said:

The scribes and the Pharisees have taken their seat on the chair of Moses. Therefore, do and observe all things whatsoever they tell you, but do not follow their example. Mat 23:2-3

So just because someone is sinful does not cancel out their teaching authority. The chair of Moses also is a type of predeccesor to the chair of Peter which is where the Pope teaches "ex cathedra". Overall many people misunderstand papal infalliblity anyway. Papal infallibility is not something that forces the pope to teach free from error rather it prevents him from teaching error when on faith and morals. Peter is constantly given a prominent role among the apostles in the Gospels.

Also, where does it suggest that the church as mentioned in the Scriptures translates to the "Catholic Church"?

The Church in scriptures is the Catholic Church because it was the only Church at the time. It was known as "The Way" in the early Church. And was actually know as the "Catholic" Church beggining in no later than 100 A.D. when St. Ignatius of Antioch, a student of John the Apostle, said in his Letter to the Smyrnaeans

Wherever the bishop appears, there let the people be; as wherever Jesus Christ is, there is the Catholic Church.

This letter was around 100 A.D. so the term was being readily used by then. All the evidence points to the fact that the early Church was the Catholic Church.

God Bless.
 
aLoneVoice said:
William,

You just stated that 'scripturally speaking' you cannot prove the office of the Pope - or that Peter was the first one or the infallibility of Peter.

No, no, NO! I simply stated that "strictly speaking, you cannot find the word "pope" or "papacy, in so many words, but I can prove the formation of the papacy," given especially by the link I provided from Dave Armstrong's blob/web site.

Did you read it? ;)

I am interested in Scriptural proof.

Good! Then go back and read the link I provided!

I also advise you to get the book:

JESUS, PETER & THE KEYS
by Scott Butler, et al
ISBN: 1-882972-54-6

Which totally and completely proves the primacy of Peter and the formatiion of the papacy, using copious scripture quotes coming out of your ear! :)

The term 'catholic' means universal; broad. I can say that I am a member of the catholic church, but not a member of the Catholic church. They are different.

DUH! :)

Now go discover for yourself, the only Church in existence at the time that the title could apply to. So please find for me, your idea of the "catholic church" (lower case) in the time period between Pentecost and about A.D. 1000. And for your informationn, I can find tons of stuff concerning my Church, The One Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church! :)

As a Christian are we not to defend the Christian faith. As a Mennonite, I can explain the Anabaptist practice of living out my Christian faith.

1. Yes, I can defend my Catholic Faith.

2. Go ahead and defend your Mennonite Faith, if your choose.

I do not understand what a "Catholic" Faith or even a "Mennonite Faith" is. I would also except to explain my Mennonite practice on the basis of Scripture.

My Catholic faith can be traced back to it's founder - Jesus Christ,
AD 33.

Yours can be traced to one Menno Simons. See the following link:

http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/10190b.htm

And yet, even with the Catechism - us "good Christians" are not able to partake of the ordiance of the Last Supper - as commanded by Christ. The only qualification that the Scriptures places on partaking the Lord Supper is that one is right with God - who is the Catholic Church to deny a believer of partaking?

There is a reason for this, my friend. You good people see the Eucharist as only symbolic and not the real body and blood of Christ, a doctrine that is also shared with us by the Orthodox Church (the Lutherans have a mofified version of the doctrine.)

And since all Protestants do not believe in this most profound teaching, it would be a sacralige for others to take it "unworthily,." per what Paul said in 1 Cor. 10:16 and 11:23-29. Sorry if this offends you, but we must remain true to the doctrine...

Gode bless,

PAX

Bill+†+



Pillar and Foundation of Truth, the Church. (1 Tim 3:15)
 
reply

Oh really. There you guys go again, presuming things.



May God bless, Golfjack
 
Re: reply

golfjack said:
Oh really. There you guys go again, presuming things.



May God bless, Golfjack

:crazyeyes: I have no idea who this was intended for... :smt039
 
William - I believe you misunderstood - you are confusing "faith" with "practrice".

I do not have a Mennonite "faith" - I practice (live out) my Christian faith through the Anabaptist tradition. When I speak of my faith, I do not speak of a Mennonite Faith, but my Christian faith.

In the Early Church - the term Catholic was used to mean 'universal, christian, broad' church. It was not meant to 'label' or create a demonination.

I can appreciate defending and standing up for doctrine - however, doesn't the Scripture teach that if we partake of the Lord's Supper in an unworthy manner that we eat and drink condemnation unto ourselves?

Also, there is no Scripture support for transubstiation.
 
aLoneVoice said:
William - I believe you misunderstood - you are confusing "faith" with "practrice".

I do not have a Mennonite "faith" - I practice (live out) my Christian faith through the Anabaptist tradition. When I speak of my faith, I do not speak of a Mennonite Faith, but my Christian faith.

Can you demonsetrate that Mennonite faith system between Pentecost until about A.D. 1000?

In the Early Church - the term Catholic was used to mean 'universal, christian, broad' church. It was not meant to 'label' or create a demonination.

Indeed! and for the first 1000 years of Christinity there was only one Church! There were no "denominations" of that Church - Until Luther came along and was one of the starters of the so called Protestant Reformation.

Guess which one it is in that first 1000 year period! Guess which is the only Church who can historically trace her history back to the very threshold of the apostolic era. :)

I can appreciate defending and standing up for doctrine - however, doesn't the Scripture teach that if we partake of the Lord's Supper in an unworthy manner that we eat and drink condemnation unto ourselves?

Which comes exactly frm the scripture quotes I gave in my last reply! Now, if your do not believe in the True Presence of Christ in what we call the Holy Eucharist, you cannot be worthy of partaking of it! And in case you are wondering, here is my argument scripturally why the doctrine of Transubstantion is proven in scripture:

http://bellsouthpwp2.net/p/u/putnam_w/John%206.htm

I hope you take the time to click on this link and throughly read what I have to say there. :)

Also, there is no Scripture support for transubstiation.

See my link above... :smt039

God bless,

PAX

Bill+†+



Not riches, but God.
Not honors, but God.
Not distinction, but God.
Not dignities, but God.
Not advancement, but God.
God always and in everything.


- St. Vincent Pallotti -
 
Can you demonsetrate that Mennonite faith system between Pentecost until about A.D. 1000?

Until Constatine legalized the 'church' - Current Mennonite/Anapbaptist practices were the norm. The early church was pacifistic and baptized believers after a profession of faith.

Indeed! and for the first 1000 years of Christinity there was only one Church! There were no "denominations" of that Church - Until Luther came along and was one of the starters of the so called Protestant Reformation.

Luther's intent was not to create a demonination, but rather reform the Roman Catholic church.

Guess which one it is in that first 1000 year period! Guess which is the only Church who can historically trace her history back to the very threshold of the apostolic era.

As a member of the Body of Christ, I do not need to trace a history. All I need to know is that I am saved through the Lordship of Jesus Christ (Romans 10:8-11). Having been accepted into the family of God, I am a member of the universal (catholic, if you will) church that has Jesus Christ as it's head.

IF, as you say, that Jesus Christ appointed Peter to lead the church - then why are Pope's elected through the ballot process - should they not be appointed by God?

Which comes exactly frm the scripture quotes I gave in my last reply! Now, if your do not believe in the True Presence of Christ in what we call the Holy Eucharist, you cannot be worthy of partaking of it! And in case you are wondering, here is my argument scripturally why the doctrine of Transubstantion is proven in scripture:

http://bellsouthpwp2.net/p/u/putnam_w/John%206.htm

I hope you take the time to click on this link and throughly read what I have to say there.

But William, why are you putting more, than what the Scriptures ouline conditions on partaking of the Lord's Supper? You say that I cannot partake of the Lord's Supper because I do not agree with the Roman Catholic's teaching on it. Agreement with the Roman Catholic position on the Lord's Supper is not a condition to partake according to Scriptures.

But let's say it is - according to Scripture it is the responsibility of the person to make sure they are partaking 'correctly'. Not the church.

IF I were to partake in an inapporpaite manner - then I would be drinking condemnation upon myself.
 
[quote:a8530]Can you demonstrate that Mennonite faith system between Pentecost until about A.D. 1000?

Until Constatine legalized the 'church' - Current Mennonite/Anapbaptist practices were the norm. The early church was pacifistic and baptized believers after a profession of faith.[/quote:a8530]

I’m glad you did not state the Constantine began the Catholic Church, as others have claimed! :)

But your answer falls miserably to the ground, which is actually no answer at all but only your opinion. When I wanted you to “demonstrate†this Mennonite faith, I wanted you to use good documentation, such their writings, artifacts, architectural ruins and frescoes on catacomb walls, etc., such as we can do with the history of the Catholic Church.

[quote:a8530]Indeed! and for the first 1000 years of Christinity there was only one Church! There were no "denominations" of that Church - Until Luther came along and was one of the starters of the so called Protestant Reformation.

Luther's intent was not to create a demonination, but rather reform the Roman Catholic church. [/quote:a8530]

Indeed! But look what happened in his defiance to the Church! Had he not been stubborn, lost his cool and kept with the faith, he could have became a great reformer! Instead and unfortunately, he was finally excommunicated. The Catholic Church has had great reformers who did not leave the faith in their great word, an outstanding example is St. Catherine of Sienna.

[quote:a8530]Guess which one it is in that first 1000 year period! Guess which is the only Church who can historically trace her history back to the very threshold of the apostolic era.

As a member of the Body of Christ, I do not need to trace a history. All I need to know is that I am saved through the Lordship of Jesus Christ (Romans 10:8-11). Having been accepted into the family of God, I am a member of the universal (catholic, if you will) church that has Jesus Christ as it's head. [/quote:a8530]

You will recall my paste-in from what the Catechism of the Catholic Church teaches, don’t you? But if you are satisfied in being an “incomplete member†of the Catholic Church, I can’t force you to do otherwise. All I can do is to attempt to get you to think. That is all I can do, come, Holy Spirit…
IF, as you say, that Jesus Christ appointed Peter to lead the church - then why are Pope's elected through the ballot process - should they not be appointed by God?

Did you notice the apostles electing a replacement of Judas with a taking of a ballot? If God were to choose to do this, God would do it! So apparently, God is satisfied that the select members of the Church, the College of Cardinals, are the ones who will do the electing, the Holy Spirit doing the “directing.†:)

[quote:a8530]Which comes exactly from the scripture quotes I gave in my last reply! Now, if your do not believe in the True Presence of Christ in what we call the Holy Eucharist, you cannot be worthy of partaking of it! And in case you are wondering, here is my argument scripturally why the doctrine of Transubstantion is proven in scripture:

http://bellsouthpwp2.net/p/u/putnam_w/John%206.htm

I hope you take the time to click on this link and throughly read what I have to say there.

But William, why are you putting more, than what the Scriptures ouline conditions on partaking of the Lord's Supper? You say that I cannot partake of the Lord's Supper because I do not agree with the Roman Catholic's teaching on it. Agreement with the Roman Catholic position on the Lord's Supper is not a condition to partake according to Scriptures.[/quote:a8530]

Why do I get the impression you did not read the link I provided above? Does not John 6 give you ample proof of what the Holy Eucharist is? If not, then I cannot make you believe it. Since you do not believe in the Catholic Church’s teaching on the Holy Eucharist, then you cannot partake, as that would be blasphemy in our eyes! It is that simple! Incidentally, Orthodox Christians can take communion in a Catholic Church because they believe the same thing! (But unfortunately, the reciprocal is not true - the Orthodox will not allow Catholics to partake of their communion.)

Go to R.C.I.A. classes, be baptized into the Catholic Church (if your are not validly baptized) and you can take communion with us! Of course you would be a Catholic them! :)

But let's say it is - according to Scripture it is the responsibility of the person to make sure they are partaking 'correctly'. Not the church.

IF I were to partake in an inapporpaite manner - then I would be drinking condemnation upon myself.

And not believing in the True Presence of Jesus (the doctrine of transubstantiation) in the Eucharist is an “inappropriate manner,†sorry!

"While you are proclaiming peace with your lips, be careful to have it even more fully in your heart. " - St. Francis of Assisi

It is interesting that you take the saying here from a great Catholic saint, there is hope for you yet! :)

God bless,

PAX

Bill+†+


LORD, have mercy on us.
CHRIST, have mercy on us.
LORD, have mercy on us.
CHRIST, hear us.
CHRIST, graciously hear us.
GOD, THE FATHER OF HEAVEN, have mercy on us.
GOD THE SON, REDEEMER OF THE WORLD, have mercy on us.
GOD THE HOLY GHOST, have mercy on us.
HOLY TRINITY, ONE GOD, have mercy on us.
HOLY MARY, pray for us.
HOLY MOTHER OF GOD, pray for us.
HOLY VIRGIN OF VIRGINS, pray for us.
ST. MICHAEL, pray for us.
ST. GABRIEL, pray for us.
ST. RAPHAEL, pray for us.
ALL YE HOLY ANGELS AND ARCHANGELS, pray for us.
ALL YE HOLY ORDERS OF BLESSED SPIRITS, pray for us.
ST. JOHN THE BAPTIST, pray for us.
ST. JOSEPH, pray for us.
ALL YE HOLY PATRIARCHS AND PROPHETS, pray for us.
ST. PETER, pray for us.
ST. PAUL, pray for us.
ST. ANDREW, pray for us.
ST. JAMES, pray for us.
ST. JOHN, pray for us.
ST. THOMAS, pray for us.
ST. JAMES, pray for us.
ST. PHILIP, pray for us.
ST. BARTHOLOMEW, pray for us.
ST. MATTHEW, pray for us.
ST. SIMON, pray for us.
ST. THADDEUS, pray for us.
ST. BARNABAS, pray for us.
ST. LUKE, pray for us.
ST. MARK, pray for us.
ST. PATRICK, pray for us.
ALL YE HOLY APOSTLES AND EVANGELIST, pray for us.
ALL YE HOLY DISCIPLES OF OUR LORD, pray for us.
ALL YE HOLY INNOCENTS, pray for us.
BE MERCIFUL, spare us, O Lord!
BE MERCIFUL, graciously hear us, O Lord!
FROM ALL EVIL, O Lord, deliver us.
FROM ALL SIN, O Lord, deliver us.
FROM THY WRATH, O Lord, deliver us.
FROM A SUDDEN AND UNPROVIDED DEATH, O Lord, deliver us.
FROM THE DECEITS OF THE DEVIL, O Lord, deliver us.
FROM ANGER, HATRED, AND ALL ILL WILL, O Lord, deliver us.
FROM THE SPIRIT OF FORNICATION, O Lord, deliver us.
FROM LIGHTNING AND TEMPEST, O Lord, deliver us.
FROM THE SCOURGE OF EARTHQUAKE, O Lord, deliver us.
FROM PESTILENCE, FAMINE, AND WAR, O Lord, deliver us.
FROM EVERLASTING DEATH, O Lord, deliver us.
THROUGH THE MYSTERY OF THY HOLY INCARNATION, O Lord, Deliver us.
THROUGH THY COMING, O Lord, deliver us.
THROUGH THY NATIVITY, O Lord, deliver us.
THROUGH THY BAPTISM AND HOLY FASTING, O Lord, deliver us.
THROUGH THY CROSS AND PASSION, O Lord, deliver us.
THROUGH THY DEATH AND BURIAL, O Lord, deliver us.
THROUGH THY HOLY RESURRECTION, O Lord, deliver us.
THROUGH THINE ADMIRABLE ASCENSION, O Lord, deliver us.
THROUGH THE COMING OF THE HOLY GHOST, THE PARACLETE, O Lord, deliver us.
IN THE DAY OF JUDGMENT, We Sinners beseech Thee, hear us.
THAT THOU WOULDST SPARE US, We beseech Thee, hear us.
THAT THOU WOULDST PARDON US, We beseech Thee, hear us.
THAT THOU WOULDST VOUCHSAFE TO BRING US TO TRUE PENANCE, We Beseech Thee hear us.
THAT THOU WOULDST VOUCHSAFE TO GOVERN AND PRESERVE THY HOLY CHURCH.... We beseech Thee, hear us.
THAT THOU WOULDST VOUCHSAFE TO PRESERVE OUR APOSTOLIC PRELATE AND ALL ECCLESIASTICAL ORDERS IN HOLY RELIGION. We beseech Thee, hear us.
THAT THOU WOULDST VOUCHSAFE TO HUMBLE THE ENEMIES OF THY HOLY CHURCH, We beseech Thee, hear us.
THAT THOU WOULDST VOUCHSAFE TO GIVE PEACE AND TRUE CONCORD TO CHRISTIAN KINGS AND PRINCES, We beseech Thee, hear us.
THAT THOU WOULDST VOUCHSAFE TO GRANT PEACE AND UNITY TO ALL CHRISTIAN PEOPLE, We beseech Thee, hear us.
THAT THOU WOULDST VOUCHSAFE TO BRING BACK TO THE UNITY OF THE CHURCH ALL THOSE WHO HAVE STRAYED AWAY, AND LEAD TO THE LIGHT OF THE GOSPEL ALL UNBELIEVERS, We beseech Thee, hear us.
THAT THOU WOULDST VOUCHSAFE TO CONFIRM AND PRESERVE US THY HOLY SERVICE, We beseech Thee, hear us.
THAT THOU WOULDST LIFT UP OUR MINDS TO HEAVENLY DESIRES, We beseech Thee, hear us.
THAT THOU WOULDST RENDER ETERNAL BLESSINGS TO ALL OUR BENEFACTORS, We beseech Thee, hear us.
THAT THOU WOULDST DELIVER OUR SOULS AND THOSE OF OUR BRETHREN, RELATIVE, AND BENEFACTORS FROM ETERNAL DAMNATION, We beseech Thee, hear us.
THAT THOU WOULDST VOUCHSAFE TO GIVE AND PRESERVE THE FRUITS OF THE EARTH, We beseech Thee, hear us.
THAT THOU WOULDST VOUCHSAFE TO GIVE ETERNAL REST TO ALL THE FAITHFUL DEPARTED, We beseech Thee, hear us.
THAT THOU WOULDST VOUCHSAFE GRACIOUSLY TO HEAR US, We beseech Thee, hear us.
SON OF GOD, We beseech Thee, hear us.
LAMB OF GOD, WHO TAKEST AWAY THE SINS OF THE WORLD, Spare us, O Lord.
LAMB OF GOD, WHO TAKEST AWAY THE SINS OF THE WORLD, Graciously hear us, O Lord
LAMB OF GOD, WHO TAKEST AWAY THE SINS OF THE WORLD, Have mercy on us.
CHRIST, HEAR US.......
CHRIST, GRACIOUSLY HEAR US.......
LORD, HAVE MERCY ON US.......
CHRIST, HAVE MERCY ON US.......
LORD, HAVE MERCY ON US.......


- The Litany of Saints -
 
Back
Top