Christian Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Is Rush Limbaugh? Racist ? You Make The Call.

Lewis

Member
The Sacking of Rush Limbaugh

Score another for the “tolerant†Left (at least on the surface–real people see through them).

Radio talk show host Rush Limbaugh was looking at joining a group of investors to buy the St. Louis Rams football team, but the Left simply could not stand for that.

As soon as word hit the street that Limbaugh was interested in this purchase in his home state, the Apostles of Tolerance from the Left wasted no time in demonizing the man. Granted, there wasn’t a whole lot of basis upon which to demonize Limbaugh and this purchase, but since when have facts and truth been an obstacle for liberals.?

We quickly began hearing that Rush Limbaugh was a racist and soon racist comments that Limbaugh allegedly made began being thrown around.

One of the comments repeated was one where Limbaugh compared certain brutish behavior in the NFL to a war between the famous gangs the Bloods and the Crips. This was, of course, said to be a racist comment. You should check the context for yourself, though, and if you even remotely can achieve objectivity, I think you’ll see this isn’t the case.

And don’t forget the one about slavery that was not only taken out of context, Limbaugh never even said it:

I mean, let’s face it, we didn’t have slavery in this country for over 100 years because it was a bad thing. Quite the opposite: slavery built the South. I’m not saying we should bring it back; I’m just saying it had its merits. For one thing, the streets were safer after dark.

No wonder McGraw Milhaven called this hysterical stampede from the Left a “high tech lynching.â€

Anyone who knows anything about Rush Limbaugh at all knows he’s not a racist. Limbaugh’s call screener, Bo Snerdley, is a black man. In fact, Snerdley is so black that last year he was certified “Black Enough to Criticize Barack Obama,†or the “Official Obama Criticizer†for short.

Economist Walter Williams (a black man) often fills in for Rush when Rush is traveling. Another black friend of Limbaugh’s, economist Thomas Sowell, has even filled in a time or two.

Rush’s friend and former football player Rev. Ken “The Hutch†Hutcherson (who is black) frequently calls in to the show for some sports-related banter.

Rush is a friend of U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas (who is black). Rush was married to his former wife Marta at Justice Thomas’ home where Justice Thomas officiated the wedding. (But then, according to the Left, Thomas doesn’t count; he’s just an Uncle Tom…one who faced his own media lynching during his confirmation hearings)

You know, for a guy with so many black friends and associates, he sure sounds like an odd candidate for being a racist to me.

So what’s the basis–however thin–for these accusations of racism? He doesn’t worship at the altar of political correctness and affirmative action.

Limbaugh, like most average Americans, believes a person ought to be judged (in the words of a certain black man) by the content of their character, not by the color of their skin. That goes not only for how we might be tempted to judge against someone, but how we might be tempted to judge in favor of someone. We shouldn’t hold someone back because of their skin color, but neither should we give someone special favors because of their skin color.

Favoritism, quotas and affirmative action are the only remedies for racism and injustice that the Left has to offer. They simply cannot get beyond skin color to evaluate a person based on their behavior, qualifications and talent.

Apparently we do have a long way to go yet in getting behind race and skin color in America. Unfortunately, those most obsessed about skin color are the ones deluded into thinking they have it all figured out.
Sources: http://www.dakotavoice.com/2009/10/the-sacking-of-rush-limbaugh/
 
Maybe its a smear campaign cos he's just getting too mouthy these days:

Clash of the Classes: Does Rush Limbaugh Finally Get It?

Last week Rush Limbaugh — mockingly called the leader of the Republican party by limo liberals in the corporate media — talked about Angelo M. Codevilla’s article published in the current issue of The American Spectator, America’s Ruling Class — And the Perils of Revolution. Codevilla points out something many of us have know for some time — both Democrats and Republicans in Congress and the White House represent the interests of the ruling class.

Following the bankster bailout and the decision by the establishment to stick the American tax payer with cost of fixing the rigged game known as the American financial system, many Republicans and Democrats came around to the realization that indeed the ruling elite are in control of the “political class†that claims to represent us. Both “Republican and Democratic office holders and their retinues show a similar presumption to dominate and fewer differences in tastes, habits, opinions, and sources of income among one another than between both and the rest of the country. They think, look, and act as a class,†writes Codevilla.

Rush Limbaugh noted last week that the Republican party as whole typically behaves more as a part of the ruling elite than politicians interested in liberty and the founding principles of the republic. “Why do we accept the premise that there must be a health care overhaul?†Limbaugh asked. “Why do we accept the premise that there must be a stimulus package? Why do they set the agenda?†This piece is partially the answer: They’re all part of the ruling class. The Republicans want to be even more accepted in the ruling class. They want to be even more powerful. They want to be considered part of it. They want to be in the clique.â€

Amazingly, Rush then said something many in the patriot movement have said for some time now — establishment Republicans are as threatened by the Tea Party movement as Democrats. “So all of you looking at the Tea Party thinking it’s the Republican Party’s salvation, the Republican members of the ruling class are just as threatened by the Tea Party as the Democrats are. Because the Tea Party is outsiders; the Tea Party is not in the big clique; the Tea Party does not want to be in the big clique. The Tea Party wants to wrest power away from the big clique. The problem, and as Mr. Codevilla’s piece points out is, what vehicle does the Tea Party use?†said Limbaugh.

It appears Limbaugh has had himself an epiphany. Let’s hope he continues along this line. The only way to save the country under the current political system is to have millions of Republicans and Democrats defect from the establishment — the ruling elite — parties and vote Republicans and Democrats out of office and replace them with principled independents who are sworn to uphold and follow the Constitution.

Clash of the Classes: Does Rush Limbaugh Finally Get It?
 
I actually stopped reading during the beginning once I realized this was a political rant with a possible race card thrown in there.

:nono
 
Limbaugh’s call screener, Bo Snerdley, is a black man. In fact, Snerdley is so black that last year he was certified “Black Enough to Criticize Barack Obama,†or the “Official Obama Criticizer†for short.

This is one of Limbaugh's funniest skits! :toofunny

It may sound racially insensitive, but it actually makes points in the other direction. The occasional statements made by Bo are intended to be a parody. I would never listen to someone who even hinted of racism, and I'm sure none was implied in the OP.

I agree with Limbaugh's politics, but I get the feeling he panders to Christians. I don't get the feeling it's in his heart. I don't listen to him much to be honest, because he has got to be the most arrogant person on radio. He is so full of himself! Whenever he talks about the arrogance of the Left, I go :o !!! Who's arrogant??!!! I agree the Left can be arrogant, but none more than Limbaugh!
:grumpy
 
I don't know if Rush Limbaugh is a racist, but he is a despicable human being. His attitude is, "I've got mine, screw you."
 
No Jason, when I lived in Georgia, I tuned in to his show everyday, when I was working at the Red Roof Inn.
 
Well I don't know who Rush Limbaugh is, I looked him up on Facebook and he's gonna be on Family Guy...so

I don't like him:nono2

JK....but I hate family guy
 
thomas sowell says it best, reverse racism is still what? RACISM! that is what the left has done.

The liberal left plays the reverse racism game. The social-democratic left is more concerned with monetary classes, so we do not usually fall prey to that malady. But don't listen to Mr. Sowell for economic advice. He is as radical as Karl Marx, just in the opposite direction. :screwloose
 
Man I grew up on Rush. Listened to him every day for many years with my dad on our car rides to and from work/school. I still listen to him and I do not think he is racist at all. I think he points things out and people simply do not like that he is telling the truth.

I agree with Mike on the pandering to Christians to some extent, but I am not willing to come out and say that because it is a bit judgmental for me. And I like Hannity more, but that's a different story.

And I can't stand that "reverse-racism" bologna (feel free to substitute a stronger word in place of bologna, I sure did!). Not only is it a racist term in of itself, but it is simply an incorrect term for what people peddle the meaning to be. The reverse of racism is a lack of racism, not racism from someone who isn't white and Christian.
 
Man I grew up on Rush. Listened to him every day for many years with my dad on our car rides to and from work/school. I still listen to him and I do not think he is racist at all. I think he points things out and people simply do not like that he is telling the truth.

Rush Limbaugh does not have a clue what he is talking about. I simply love how he praised Hawaii's health care, before he knew that it was government universal health care. All he does is try to scare people away from progressive economics. We have seen laissez-faire economics fail time and time again, yet he keeps spouting them like gospel. I would love to debate him on economics, because unlike him, I actually read and study what is going on, instead of just blaming the collapse on the Government, because they are evil and all private business is good; never mind what God said about money and the root of all evil. :study
 
If Limbaugh is so wrong, why does he have such a large audience. I know, because of the dumbed down audience who follow him like uh... ditto-heads. How does that explain the success of conservative talk show hosts up and down the dial? How does that explain Gore's plan for a liberal counterpart going defunct?

Limbaugh and other conservative hosts succeed because they are saying what people want to hear; what they want for our country. There are equally talented liberal talk show hosts who in this theory could sway a large listener following, but they have no demand, because their message doesn't resonate with mainstream America.

So, it's not just his ability to communicate (and I've already said I don't listen because of his arrogance), it's his vision and message. Fox News blows CNN and MSNBC combined away in the ratings. You can point to the dumbed down public again, or you can see that, whether it's radio or television, liberal messages aren't in demand. Conservatives drove them out of business long ago. Gore tried to revamp liberal talk but it was doomed before it started. Next was and is Obama's plan to get a grip on radio broadcasting and force stations to have equal partisan programming. They couldn't compete, so they try to force it with legislation.

If it weren't for the huge electoral votes that come from the liberal east and west coasts, their politicians would suffer the same fate. Across the great heart of this country are conservatives with conservative values.

Note - I might have stepped too far in questioning Limbaugh's heart for the Lord. That is not for me to say. But, I see him pandering by slipping vanilla religious comments in for the sake of his Christian audience.
 
Mike, I don't think you stepped to far, I just didn't want to come off as judging him. I imagine he may be a perfectly fine Christian man, unlike some other radio hosts he does so a pretty good job at hating the actions and not the person.

Sorry, I literally had water come out of my nose when I read your post GI...

All he does is try to scare people away from progressive economics. We have seen laissez-faire economics fail time and time again, yet he keeps spouting them like gospel

Good laugh, I really needed it. Thank you
 
If Limbaugh is so wrong, why does he have such a large audience. I know, because of the dumbed down audience who follow him like uh... ditto-heads. How does that explain the success of conservative talk show hosts up and down the dial? How does that explain Gore's plan for a liberal counterpart going defunct?


Let us continue your reasoning. If socialism is so wrong, why is the Parti Socialiste poised to win regain the French Senate during the next election cycle?

Limbaugh and other conservative hosts succeed because they are saying what people want to hear; what they want for our country. There are equally talented liberal talk show hosts who in this theory could sway a large listener following, but they have no demand, because their message doesn't resonate with mainstream America.

What the people want to hear is not necessarily what is correct or right. For example, Republicans believe that tax cuts do not add to the fiscal deficit, but that is silly and foolish. Besides, I am not sure conservatives pundits truly speak for the vast majority of Americans. Polls show overwhelming support for progressive policies. It is just that these progressive policies were enacted in the past, so people no longer view them as progressive and forget that great programs such as Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security are left-wing policies. Conservative pundits use fear to keep people from accepting policies that are in their best interests. For example, when pollsters asked Americans about each individual pillar of the Democrat's health insurance reform plan, they supported them in majority, but when pollsters presented it as a whole, people rejected it.

So, it's not just his ability to communicate (and I've already said I don't listen because of his arrogance), it's his vision and message. Fox News blows CNN and MSNBC combined away in the ratings. You can point to the dumbed down public again, or you can see that, whether it's radio or television, liberal messages aren't in demand. Conservatives drove them out of business long ago. Gore tried to revamp liberal talk but it was doomed before it started. Next was and is Obama's plan to get a grip on radio broadcasting and force stations to have equal partisan programming. They couldn't compete, so they try to force it with legislation.

I blame conservative's success on the failure of the left's rhetoric. Also, the Democratic party is a centre-right party, so it is hard to compete with the purity of the far-right's rhetoric; especially, when the Democrats continually let the Republicans control the conversation.

If it weren't for the huge electoral votes that come from the liberal east and west coasts, their politicians would suffer the same fate. Across the great heart of this country are conservatives with conservative values.

I forgot. We on the East and West coasts are not real Americans. :screwloose
 
Sorry, I literally had water come out of my nose when I read your post GI...



Good laugh, I really needed it. Thank you

Be kind, mate. :waving

--------------------

In honour of my 666th post, I could post a picture from the Omen, but I hate that film series, so I will post Christina from Point Pleasant.. I miss that show:

charliebrown.gif
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Let us continue your reasoning. If socialism is so wrong, why is the Parti Socialiste poised to win regain the French Senate during the next election cycle?
I can't account for what another country and culture support, and I really can't account for France! :screwloose

What the people want to hear is not necessarily what is correct or right. For example, Republicans believe that tax cuts do not add to the fiscal deficit, but that is silly and foolish. Besides, I am not sure conservatives pundits truly speak for the vast majority of Americans.
You're using Republicans and conservatives interchangeably. I'll stick with "conservatives". I've never known a conservative who didn't support tax cuts ALONG WITH decreased government spending. If both are achieved, there can be tax cuts without impacting the national deficit. Your point is lost in presenting 1/2 of the equation. I agree that what people want isn't necessarily good for them. This is why I support a call to put the clamps on network TV programming in promoting the gay agenda in so much of their programming, for example. We will not settle whether conservatism is right of wrong here, so I won't try to. I believe it is right, and the support for conservative programming supports the notion that the majority of Americans agree with me.

Polls show overwhelming support for progressive policies.
I'm sure you'd love for this to be true. It's odd that few if any liberal candidates are pointing to their victorious ram-rod of socialize health care into law. If so much of America supported it, they should all be grandstanding right now. Instead they're distancing themselves from it like leprosy. :lol It's tragic but amusing.
Socialized medicine? - nope RealClearPolitics - Election Other - Obama and Democrats' Health Care Plan
Same sex marriages? - nope. Even broken down by those who consider themselves R, D & I, the majority of Americans do not support same-sex marriages. Civil Rights
Pro-choice? - nope It's been trending more over the years toward more Pro-Live and now, support for Pro-Live is great than Pro-Choice. More Americans

Any liberal policies you'd care to demonstrate public support for?


Conservative pundits use fear to keep people from accepting policies that are in their best interests.
And liberals don't??? Conservatives want to take away your rights, eliminate Medicare, kill your sons in needless war, etc. They are all about using scare tactics to position conservatives as heartless drones who will not support the needy.

I blame conservative's success on the failure of the left's rhetoric. Also, the Democratic party is a centre-right party, so it is hard to compete with the purity of the far-right's rhetoric; especially, when the Democrats continually let the Republicans control the conversation.
Keep believe that! :thumbsup As long as liberals are in denial and don't take a serious look at their platform, support for them will continue to erode even further. :clap

I forgot. We on the East and West coasts are not real Americans. :screwloose
Glad I could remind you... ;)
 
The liberal left plays the reverse racism game. The social-democratic left is more concerned with monetary classes, so we do not usually fall prey to that malady. But don't listen to Mr. Sowell for economic advice. He is as radical as Karl Marx, just in the opposite direction. :screwloose

uh no, you dont fool me that easily, i have a jewish background, most of what my kin say is what you preach.

he is for what, working if you can for your money, ohh that just wrong, being poor and working your way out of it.

helping the poor who cant work, yup that marxian allright.lol

oh wait he believes in not looking at skin color, yup thats evil too

and i was on govt assistance. i got off it when i got the first chance. i am able and WILLING to work.

why work hard when you dont have to. i only needed money for my wifes meds, if I just made 18.00 less a ,month them i wouldnt have to rent , buy food etc.

so it paid me not to work two jobs. but i have pride as some that cant work needs that over me.

yup i must be greedy.
 
mike many a michanganders live in Florida. Florida did oddly go for obama but that isnt going to happen agian. the reason obama won florida was the larger areas of florida were blue this time.
 
Back
Top