It was used by the 3rd Panzer Division from 1941-45.
My sincere thanks for that.
I was not aware of it and I have yet to find any photograph of it being used, but it is hardly the same thing as
‘Hitler used this symbol’, is it?
jrmycchrn said:
Hitler used this same symbol also and that was before nuclear arms, the roman emporer nero used it before hitler.
Given the hundreds of military symbols used, it is hardly surprising that this ‘cross’ is one of 30 different crosses in the Panzer division and another 28 crosses, not counting the swastika, in other Wehrmacht Insignia and hundreds more around the world. Let’s see anyone design that many different crosses, as symbols, and avoid this Germanic rune. Do note that they also used exactly the same symbol the other way up. If anyone wants to read some evil significance into the ‘peace symbol’ you obviously need to read the opposite into the one the other way up. Note also that there were many Christian symbols used by the Wehrmacht for military markings. Are we to assume that all of those other crosses and religious symbols carry some evil/dark meaning? Don’t forget that Hitler regarded himself as a good Christian.
I hardly think it likely that any of them were designed or selected by Hitler. Does anyone seriously think that? Please also see the other sensible posts 8, 12, 13, 14, 15 & 17.
Another popular myth, the real invention of Holtem, a notorious self-seeker, anti-Chrsitian and Satanist.. It was also used as an anti-Christian symbol by the Saracens, those who professed Islam in the Middle Ages. They used it as a symbol of breaking the Christian cross.
Unfortunately the link you provided does not have any mention of the symbol used by the Saracens and neither does my paper copy of Britannica. Did you include the right link? I really would be grateful for any appropriate link but not to a ‘conspiracy’ web-site. They are just so pathetically biased. :halo
Holtem knew the history of the symbol, made up the story about his "drawing it up" so his Satanic leanings wouldn't be discovered. But Bertrand Russell, the head of the Direct Action Committee Against Nuclear War, knew the history as well, and gave his blessing to Holtem's lie.
I will ignore your laughable allegations, obviously 'learnt' from one of the 'conspiracy theorist' web-site.
His name was Holtom by the way - are you mixing him up with someone else?
Again, your link produced nothing to support your claim. I can find dozens of others entries with full detail of the meetings to discuss the design but your allegations appear to be no more than allegations. Can I suggest you try to leave your particular politics out of your judgements.
Actually, that would be you who has his facts mixed up with his factoids.
You obviously didn't bother to read what his girlfriend said - did you?
I suggest that we both drop that line and concentrate on the interesting stuff.