No, I can’t, because most of the time I can’t figure out what you’re asking or what your point is.That's what you said awhile back when I explained the Chapter you want to go over again. See? You won't respond to the my questions because you can't.
As far as this discussion goes, you have avoided answering almost everything and every passage I have provided and the questions I have asked.
It isn’t my position that makes no sense. You say Jesus is merely an example, but that is an insufficient view of Christ’s death and resurrection.I explain the passages you cite, then you ignore what I say and just go on with another passage that makes no sense with all of the scriptures as a whole. Your beliefs are contrary. So I'll answer one more from you.
But you completely ignore the many other things the chapter states, most of which I have given. It clearly states that “he was pierced for our transgressions; he was crushed for our iniquities; upon him was the chastisement that brought us peace, and with his wounds we are healed,” “the LORD has laid on him the iniquity of us all,” and “it was the will of the LORD to crush him; he has put him to grief.”Isa 53:4 Surely he has borne our griefs and carried our sorrows; yet we esteemed him stricken, smitten by God, and afflicted.
Isaiah is speaking of the chastizement Jesus submitted Himself to which all of Gods' sons must experience and endure or they are bastards.
This is only in reference to Christ, because only he could “make many to be accounted righteous,” through his death because “he shall bear their iniquities.”
I don’t see how it is possible to read Isa 53 and not see the clear teaching of substitutionary atonement.
Of course.Heb.12
he were a Son, yet learned he obedience by the things whichhe suffered; Heb.5:8
For whom the Lord loveth he chasteneth, and scourgeth every son whom he receiveth. Heb.12:6
God teaches all His children to show every sinner love. Even His enemies.
Jesus suffered because “it was the will of the LORD to crush him,” to have him “pierced for our transgressions” and “crushed for our iniquities.” Jesus had our sins placed him—“the LORD has laid on him the iniquity of us all”—and took the penalty of out sins so that we could be saved—“upon him was the chastisement that brought us peace.”Is it true Jesus suffered as The Righteous Man.....in His Fathers' eyes.
Is it true Jesus was unjustly called a sinner and treated as one, even thiugh it wasn't true?
If you refuse then I think it best not to try to reason any further. You may have forgotten how I told you why I no longer talk to @brightflame. You're just doing the same thing
That is the gospel.
You stated on page three:
‘In other words, "journeyman committed sin, but Jesus is being punished "for it."
This is heresy.‘
That isn’t heresy at all, that is the gospel. Jesus did for us what otherwise couldn’t be done. I had previously asked you: What is the main predicament of humans and what got us there? But you didn’t answer.
The problem is sin. Paul says that “the wages of sin is death, but the free gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord.” Death is the punishment for our sins. Jesus died to take our penalty, our punishment, upon himself so that we could live.
Your position leaves us dead in our sins, since (supposedly) Jesus didn’t pay that penalty. That means no one has eternal life. That is most certainly not good news.