Nathan
Member
Adam knew the truth but chose do deny it. It wasn't a matter of accepting or not.Are you saying Adam didn't accept the truth?
Join For His Glory for a discussion on how
https://christianforums.net/threads/a-vessel-of-honor.110278/
https://christianforums.net/threads/psalm-70-1-save-me-o-god-lord-help-me-now.108509/
Read through the following study by Tenchi for more on this topic
https://christianforums.net/threads/without-the-holy-spirit-we-can-do-nothing.109419/
Join Sola Scriptura for a discussion on the subject
https://christianforums.net/threads/anointed-preaching-teaching.109331/#post-1912042
Strengthening families through biblical principles.
Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.
Read daily articles from Focus on the Family in the Marriage and Parenting Resources forum.
Adam knew the truth but chose do deny it. It wasn't a matter of accepting or not.Are you saying Adam didn't accept the truth?
You don't "know" it you just believe it to be true. Your claim that you know is just that, a claim. It's unconvincing. There are plenty of knowledgeable people on the other side of the debate that "know" too. You deny that they know the true but claim you do. That smacks of arrogance to me.
I don't think I put anything that way. Besides, I don't know to what you are referring exactly.
Because we strongly believe it to be the case and have no reason to doubt the belief.
No. We cannot know all things. That an unbiblical position. We know in part. We're fallable. Only God knows fully about all things. What you just said is logically incoherent.
This makes no sense. How does God tell you something? Does He whisper it to you? Or does He simply speak to you through the Word?
Ok.I know things that are opposite of what you know. Therefore you are wrong and I am right.
What a silly notion.
Adam knew the truth but chose do deny it. It wasn't a matter of accepting or not.
Form or not, he was not deceived when he chose to do what he did. 1 Timothy 2:14Some form of deception was in Adams thought process.
Mormons know the truth as do Muslims. Atheists know the truth too. The know it. They will claim they have no doubt.Ok.
I will only say it's silly when someone says the other person cannot know the truth. You can know the truth just as well as I do.
Unless what we "know" differs. Oops.Ok.
I will only say it's silly when someone says the other person cannot know the truth. You can know the truth just as well as I do.
That's not my claim. It's your claim about me. .Mormons know the truth as do Muslims. Atheists know the truth too. The know it. They will claim they have no doubt.
So what. Such claims are meaningless.
When it comes to OSAS, you only think you know the truth. Because I "know" the opposite. So do most Reformed thinkers.
You claim to "know" the truth? Well so do I and what I "know" shows you to be wrong. And my position comes straight from God's word.
Oh oh
That's your claim too.
I've got an idea. Let's state our claim 1000 more times and see who wears out first. Or we could Rock Paper Scissors.
We both can't be rightThat's not my claim. It's your claim about me. .
Why denegrate another based on what you believe? It's interesting, the more I talk about this subject, the more I find the OSAS side negating the other side based on personal things.
I have stated it more than once. I do not think I am the only one who knows the truth about salvation. There are others who do, and I know that anyone can.
I know.We both can't be right
then you have to admit to the possibility that you could be wrong in your position on OSAS.I know.
No, I do not really. No more than you would have to admit your possibility of being wrong that Jesus is the Son of God to an atheist.then you have to admit to the possibility that you could be wrong in your position on OSAS.
Well there's a cop out. The two have nothing to do with each other. I'm going to assume that you wouldn't admit the possibility of being wrong about anything since this is the second time you've dodged this question. It's pointless now.No, I do not really. No more than you would have to admit your possibility of being wrong that Jesus is the Son of God to an atheist.
I see no need to attack Papa.Well there's a cop out. The two have nothing to do with each other. I'm going to assume that you wouldn't admit the possibility of being wrong about anything since this is the second time you've dodged this question. It's pointless now.
Scripture says you are both right! Just looking at different time frames of billions of billions of saved/not saved humans over the past 2000 years?We both can't be right
Maybe that's the answer.Scripture says you are both right! Just looking at different time frames of billions of billions of saved/not saved humans over the past 2000 years?