L
Lyric's Dad
Guest
Scott said:Did you have anything specific in mind in regard to the words I said - that prompted your comment?
I can answer that fairly easily for you. Its the result namelessly introducing cultic doctrines into a discussion. For example, lets take a look at a few things here.
[quote:791c1]Hell is not even a real concept but a faulty translation.
Because of the distortions of men and faulty translations of the Bible.
And we talk of Christ, we rejoice in Christ, we preach of Christ, we prophesy of Christ, and we write according to our prophecies, that our children may know to what source they may look for a remission of their sins.
Notice any patterns here? We have clear Mormon doctrines along with a passage from the Book of Mormon itself. So what do we have? We have a Mormon who's slipped in among us and is trying to debate in a Christian Apologetics forum despite the fact that he apparently has no confidence in God's Word to begin with.[/quote:791c1]LOL!
No, I didn't slip in. Anyone is welcome to join regardless of their belief system.
No confidence in God's word? Hardly. I love the words of the Lord. All of them. I also believe Him when He speaks and don't relegate Him to changes that fit my personal creed. I take His word for things and when He says He is the same today, yesterday and forever, I believe Him. Do you?
I believe Him when He tells me He does things only through His Prophets. I believe the Bible when it says that the Church will have Apostles and Prophets. I believe Him when He says He sent His Son to die for me. Of course you are going to have to try and deride that. I don't expect anything other then that.
But the fact is that I have not once tried to preach the LDS faith. I have not once posted a reference or taught anything that contradicts the Bible. But still you feel the need to try and attack. That is what we have come to expect. Remember, you are the one that brought up the LDS Church here, not me. I don't deny that I am LDS. So what?
My signature does not say anything about the Book of Mormon. It does not give a reference. Can you tell me what in that signature contradicts anything Christian? Or is it just that you don't like the Book of Mormon? You and Gary are the only ones who had any idea where it came from. Had you not stated it, it would have just remained a signature and one that is very Christian at that. One that reflects a sentiment that should be on all of our hearts. One that is loving and looks to the betterment of our own children through the merits of the Lord Jesus Christ alone. It only became an issue once you realized where it came from. Until then, it was not a problem. After all, it has been there for quite some time now. So, if it is not promoting an ideal that is un-Christian, what is the problem? If I were to quote a book by some author that stated something you don't agree with, would that too make it against the rules?
Or is it, Scott, that you have an obvious bone to pick and are trying desperately to find something to get me with? I think we both know the answer to that one.
I find it funny that the same rhetoric is being used all these years later. I wonder what you would have done at cathage jail....... No, wait, I don't wonder.