JohnDB
Member
This is one of those things I find so interesting: how did it go from everything that happened (surely more than we have recorded) to what we have in Scripture?
I think we do have what's most important, but how did that weeding out process work?
Paper and ink was extremely expensive at the time of writing. Paper was often washed and re-used. The style of writing was extremely abreviated with many "of course" things left out such as cultural norms, geography and history.
Today we have electronic mediums where people put all that stuff in. But it was basically about bandwidth and value.
The more ideas you could fit in a short amount of writing the better. (Scriptures are the most compact).
What Matthew wrote about Jesus' time "in the wilderness" is very Jewish style of writing. Matthew wasn't there. Matthew could only know what to write if Jesus told him to. This passage can also be read as figurative in a few ways...but not that it didn't happen. The temptations were very real. (Which is the focus of the passage)
What is interesting to see is that all the temptations were very self-serving in some fashion or another. (In some rather deceitful manner). The logic of them sounding very good...but Jesus was better. (Thank God)