Reposting this from another thread which has strayed off-topic:
I grew up in a Baptist church (obviously) with Nazarene relatives outside of my own parents. I don't know how many arguments and debates went on between my family members, but most of the confusion came from some relatives thinking that "once saved, always saved" meant that it is okay to sin. Meanwhile, in our Baptist church, my family would hear countless sermons on the dangers of sin.
Note: This thread is NOT intended to become a debate on whether "once saved, always saved" is correct or not. This thread IS intended to point out the errors (or defend the stance) of preconceived notions about churches that teach eternal security.
JoJo said:It bothers me deeply when people have preconceived notions about churches that teach "once saved, always saved" and think they are condoning sin. They are not! I will adamantly defend them until somebody somewhere finally realizes that "once saved, always saved" does not mean it is okay to sin.
And just to be clear: IT IS NOT OKAY TO SIN.
I grew up in a Baptist church (obviously) with Nazarene relatives outside of my own parents. I don't know how many arguments and debates went on between my family members, but most of the confusion came from some relatives thinking that "once saved, always saved" meant that it is okay to sin. Meanwhile, in our Baptist church, my family would hear countless sermons on the dangers of sin.
Note: This thread is NOT intended to become a debate on whether "once saved, always saved" is correct or not. This thread IS intended to point out the errors (or defend the stance) of preconceived notions about churches that teach eternal security.