Christian Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

One World Government

I apologize for seeming harsh upon Drew. Though I think he's got his head in-the-sand a bit on the matter, I think he may mean well. I probably shouldn't have included anyone's quotes in my last post.


Concerning the "kingdom age" idea, it's really deep and does not really agree with much of men's doctrine of what's termed "kingdom age". One thing it definitely does not involve, is the erroneous idea that Christ's return happenned in 70 A.D.

Gen 49:10-11
10 The sceptre shall not depart from Judah, nor a lawgiver from between his feet, until Shiloh come; and unto Him shall the gathering of the people be.
11 Binding his foal unto the vine, and his ass's colt unto the choice vine; he washed his garments in wine, and his clothes in the blood of grapes:
(KJV)

Genesis 49 is prophecy given through Jacob to the 12 tribes of Israel, for the last days.

The "sceptre" involves part of God's Birthright promise to chosen Israel. That sceptre is about the earthly throne of David of the tribe of Judah. God promised to David his throne on earth would exist through all generations, even forever, never ceasing (2 Sam.7). Thusly, the sceptre shall not depart from Judah until Shiloh (Christ) comes, meaning the sceptre will be handed over to Christ Jesus de facto, on earth. And the gathering of the people matter there is about all those who believe on Christ Jesus unto Salvation. All believers are to be gathered where Christ will reign upon the throne of David from, in Jerusalem on earth.

That leaves no room for some Preterist to say that has already happenned today.

At present Christ's Kingdom on earth today is spiritual, among His Body of believers. But it is also literally on earth today too, which is what that Gen.49 verse is about concerning that "sceptre" given to Judah.

When God split old Israel up into two separate kingdoms after Solomon's reign (1 Kings 11 forward), He later scattered the majority of Israelites through the nations. But He promised there would always exist a remnant of Israel on earth that knew His Truth, and He would keep them wherever they went. His promise through Jacob that one of his sons would become "a multitude of nations" also involves Christ's Kingdom established here on earth along with that sceptre. THAT is the part of Christ's royal inheritance involving Israel. It's here on earth but He is not here yet to claim that sceptre rule and throne of David. Judah still has it today like Gen.49:10 shows. (And where's that at, some might say? Only devout Bible study and prayer to our Heavenly Father through His Son can reveal it. Men's doctrines certainly won't nor can reveal it).

How will we know when Christ inherits that "sceptre"? Simple. The gathering of the people (saints) will be where He is, and He will sit upon David's throne, and the 12 tribes will be re-established back to their old inheritances promised to their fathers, on this earth. Ezekiel 48 gives the layout of the 12 tribe's borders in that re-establishing. All believers on The Savior Jesus Christ, of all nations, will be gathered there with them. This is a major declaration in many places of the Old Testament prophets. It is also what Revelation 21 & 22 shows, in relation to Christ's Milennium reign of Ezekiel 37 and Ezekiel 40 forward.

Before that can happen, a false messiah must come first. A false world system of ten horns, ten crowns, and seven heads must be setup covering all nations on earth. And worship of the dragon through his image must occur, with many falling away from Christ into that deception of false worship. A time of all wars on earth having stopped must come, establishing the "Peace and safety" condition on earth for false messiah to operate in (1 Thess.5). That is the "world peace" today's globalists are working towards on earth today.

It appears not many are taught, nor understand about Satan's original rebellion against The Father, when it was and what it was like, and how it was manifested. God told the answers to all that in His Word, for those willing to listen to Him only.

There is a pattern within the history of the Old Testament kings and beast kingdoms. The pattern is about a world beast kingdom set up over all the earth, in final. The previous beast kingdoms were partial blueprints for the final one being setup on earth today. But no mystery that Satan's original rebellion involved the very first beast kingdom setup on this earth. It is mentioned in Rev.12:3-4 in relation to when he drew one third of the angels into rebellion with him. That world beast system of old had only "seven crowns", the main difference between the one of Rev.13:1 which is forming up today.

Our Lord has tried to warn us about this final event that's to bring the end of this world by all the examples He gave in His Word about the previous beast kingdoms on earth. Those in Christ have no need to fear it, but being strong in Faith know we will overcome it. It's a great marker for how close we are to end our trials on this earth by Christ's enemies. They know they have only a very short time to work this last and greatest final deception on earth prior to Christ's return. Our Lord doesn't want us to fear it, but be prepared to make a stand for Him in going through it, giving His witness by The Holy Spirit. So this is NOT the time to want to escape the coming tribulaton trials. It's a time to consider where our priorities lay.
 
veteran said:
That's exactly the type of thinking I was talking about, pretty much 'head-in-the-sand' as to the times, blind like the Pharisees of old as to God's Word coming to pass right in front of them.
Entirely inappropriate and unChristian.
 
jasoncran said:
i think drew is of the beilief that we are in the kindgom age, ie we become of the governing body of the world and then christ takes it over, is the correct drew?
I agree with Jesus and Paul - we are indeed in the kngdom age. And we are indeed called to "implement" God's kingdom.
 
veteran said:
Concerning the "kingdom age" idea, it's really deep and does not really agree with much of men's doctrine of what's termed "kingdom age". One thing it definitely does not involve, is the erroneous idea that Christ's return happenned in 70 A.D.
Please do not put words in my mouth. I believe that Jesus will indeed return in the future. The text in Matthew speaks of his "coming". For reasons I will not go into in this post, the question to Jesus about "when will You come" can be understood as the question: "When will you take your kingship". And this does indeed occur in the 1st century.

I am prepared to discuss any and all elements of Matthew 24 and what it means.

And there is a mountain of evidence that Jesus is already king. If you suggest otherwise, I think you really need to ask who it is that has their head in the sand. Just one of many texts that support the present kingship of Jesus:

Then Jesus came to them and said, "All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me.

Jesus has already been given all authority here on earth. If that does not make Him king, what does it make him?
 
jasoncran said:
drew in another thread and after some biblical research i will debate this with you.
Hi Jason. What, specifically do you want to debate? If it is the question of Jesus being or not being king right now, you should know there is already a well-established thread on that in the Apologetics forum.
 
i will look at the verse that back up what i believe that the millenium will come and the tribulation hasnt started yet, and we will be raptured up. i want to know the versus needed to defend this position and what my homechurch teaches.
 
Drew said:
veteran said:
Concerning the "kingdom age" idea, it's really deep and does not really agree with much of men's doctrine of what's termed "kingdom age". One thing it definitely does not involve, is the erroneous idea that Christ's return happenned in 70 A.D.
Please do not put words in my mouth. I believe that Jesus will indeed return in the future. The text in Matthew speaks of his "coming". For reasons I will not go into in this post, the question to Jesus about "when will You come" can be understood as the question: "When will you take your kingship". And this does indeed occur in the 1st century.

I am prepared to discuss any and all elements of Matthew 24 and what it means.

And there is a mountain of evidence that Jesus is already king. If you suggest otherwise, I think you really need to ask who it is that has their head in the sand. Just one of many texts that support the present kingship of Jesus:

Then Jesus came to them and said, "All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me.

Jesus has already been given all authority here on earth. If that does not make Him king, what does it make him?
He not only does reign...the Word says He MUST reign.
1 Corinthians 15:25 said:
For he must reign, till he hath put all enemies under his feet.
 
Drew said:
veteran said:
That's exactly the type of thinking I was talking about, pretty much 'head-in-the-sand' as to the times, blind like the Pharisees of old as to God's Word coming to pass right in front of them.
Entirely inappropriate and unChristian.

The blind Pharisees called my Lord Jesus names too, and even said He cast out devils by Beelzebub. But that didn't change their state of spiritual blindness.
 
veteran said:
Drew said:
Do I think you are insane? No. Do I think you are on the wrong path theologically? Probably.

As you may or may not know, there is some difference in opinion on the timing of various prophecies. As one example, probably most Christians see Matthew 24 as a prophecy about things yet to happen. I, and some others, think that Matthew 24 was largely fulfilled by the events of 70 AD. I would be willing to bet that you and I would not agree on what "world government" prophecies are all about.

In any event, I think the important things is to no react with paranoia at every effort of world leaders to get together and solve a problem. I do think there is a strong elememt of "conpiracy theory" thinking in the church that is profoundly unhealthy.

Have you considered the possibility that, in reference to Copenhagen, world leaders are simply co-operating in the hope of making the world a cleaner place?


That's exactly the type of thinking I was talking about, pretty much 'head-in-the-sand' as to the times, blind like the Pharisees of old as to God's Word coming to pass right in front of them.

The western Christian nations are losing their national sovreignty to world socialism by the hour from globalist leaders giving it away to international organizations and treaties with the goal for a one world government. Do their blind spokesmen really think globalist think-tanks like the Tri-Lateral Commission, Council On Foreign Affairs, Bilderburger summits, EU and those in association with such groups that have even proposed the term "one-world government" out of their own mouths, is just all a figment of one's imagination? But I guess for those blinded, if there ain't anything about it in the news or on TV then it just ain't true!

The western Christian nations are losing their national sovreignty to world socialism by the hour from globalist leaders giving it away to international organizations and treaties with the goal for a one world government.

Yes, Satan is out to destroy Israel...be it spiritual or bloodline. :gah :)
 
Drew said:
veteran said:
Concerning the "kingdom age" idea, it's really deep and does not really agree with much of men's doctrine of what's termed "kingdom age". One thing it definitely does not involve, is the erroneous idea that Christ's return happenned in 70 A.D.
Please do not put words in my mouth. I believe that Jesus will indeed return in the future. The text in Matthew speaks of his "coming". For reasons I will not go into in this post, the question to Jesus about "when will You come" can be understood as the question: "When will you take your kingship". And this does indeed occur in the 1st century.

I am prepared to discuss any and all elements of Matthew 24 and what it means.

And there is a mountain of evidence that Jesus is already king. If you suggest otherwise, I think you really need to ask who it is that has their head in the sand. Just one of many texts that support the present kingship of Jesus:

Then Jesus came to them and said, "All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me.

Jesus has already been given all authority here on earth. If that does not make Him king, what does it make him?

Our Lord Jesus Christ has ALWAYS been The KING. He didn't just start becoming The KING after The Father raised Him from the dead and ascended to Heaven.

The Biblical idea of Christ's inheritance, and what all that involves is what must be weighed, for the mere idea of a king means having a kingdom to reign over. If one says Christ's inheritance was claimed in the 1st century that automatically disagrees with many Bible Scriptures that declare Christ's literal inheritance that's yet to come.

1 Pet 1:3-5
3 Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, Which according to His abundant mercy hath begotten us again unto a lively hope by the resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead,
4 To an inheritance incorruptible, and undefiled, and that fadeth not away, reserved in heaven for you,
5Who are kept by the power of God through faith unto salvation ready to be revealed in the last time.
(KJV)
 
researcher said:
Yes, Satan is out to destroy Israel...be it spiritual or bloodline. :gah :)

If one was asked to choose between the 1st century with the Roman empire vs. the joining of nations today with world globalism in helping to interpret the proper timing of the Rev.13:1 beast system, which choice would be the most logical choice? Were there as many populated areas on earth under the Roman empire that would outweigh today's globalist plans for a one world government over ALL nations, i.e., the whole earth? Did such international bodies like the United Nations exist in the time of Rome?

And if one still chose to believe the old Roman empire as the fulfillment of the Rev.13:1 beast system, how would they account for this later one world government movement that's happenning today? The abundant evidence for the later movement today is so apparent, a simple denial of its existence does not show a desire for understanding, or, evidence of the "spirit of slumber" Apostle Paul mentioned in Romans 11:8 (pulling from Isaiah 29).

Who that has studied the Old Testament Books of the prophets doesn't understand those beast kingdoms of old, and the beast kingdom being setup on earth today is for the purpose of destroying the Israel of God, the same Israel (whether spiritual or bloodline) which is Christ's inheritance?
.
 
veteran said:
Our Lord Jesus Christ has ALWAYS been The KING. He didn't just start becoming The KING after The Father raised Him from the dead and ascended to Heaven.
You don't think the Kingdom refers to the House of Israel and the Throne of David?
Matthew 21:5 said:
Tell ye the daughter of Sion, Behold, thy King cometh unto thee, meek, and sitting upon an ass, and a colt the foal of an ass.
The kingdom Jesus brought in set Him over a house not made with hands.
The Israel of God....the church, as I read the Word.

David was told he would be sleeping with his fathers when his seed would establish his kingdom.
If the kingdom was established after the resurrection of the saints, David would be glorified and see it's establishment. I believe this refers to Christ's first coming.
2 Samuel 7:12 said:
And when thy days be fulfilled, and thou shalt sleep with thy fathers, I will set up thy seed after thee, which shall proceed out of thy bowels, and I will establish his kingdom.
 
Vic C. said:
A one world government shouldn't concern us as much as a one world religion. :shocked!

Interesting...

The only "one world government/religion" I know of that is prophesied in scripture is this one:

Isaiah 9:6 For unto us a Child is born,
Unto us a Son is given;
And the government will be upon His shoulder.
And His name will be called
Wonderful, Counselor, Mighty God,
Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace.
7 Of the increase of His government and peace
There will be no end,
Upon the throne of David and over His kingdom,
To order it and establish it with judgment and justice
From that time forward, even forever.
The zeal of the Lord of hosts will perform this.

I find absolutely NOTHING to fear about this, the ONLY prophesied "one world government/religion" found in scripture.
 
veteran said:
Our Lord Jesus Christ has ALWAYS been The KING. He didn't just start becoming The KING after The Father raised Him from the dead and ascended to Heaven.
This sounds nice, but it is not what the Bible teaches. I am not, of course, denying that Jesus "always existed". Nor am I denying His divinity. But the Scriptures clearly teach that He entered into His kingship over the Jews (and the world) 2000 years ago.

Consider this text from Isaiah 52:

7How lovely on the mountains
Are the feet of him who brings good news,
Who announces peace
And brings good news of happiness,
Who announces salvation,
And says to Zion, "Your God reigns!"
8Listen! Your watchmen lift up their (P)voices,
They shout joyfully together;
For they will see with their own eyes
When the LORD restores Zion.


This text is clearly about anticipation of a reign that has yet to be initiated. Now I think that this propechy was fulfilled 2000 years ago. You may disagree.

But either way, the mere existence of this text - with its clear anticipation of the initiation of a kingship - shows that its not really correct to say that "Jesus has always been King".

Remember, at the time Jesus was born, the Jews considered themselves to still be in exile, even though they were physically back in their land. To be in exile is to be without a king.
 
veteran said:
If one says Christ's inheritance was claimed in the 1st century that automatically disagrees with many Bible Scriptures that declare Christ's literal inheritance that's yet to come.

1 Pet 1:3-5
3 Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, Which according to His abundant mercy hath begotten us again unto a lively hope by the resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead,
4 To an inheritance incorruptible, and undefiled, and that fadeth not away, reserved in heaven for you,
5Who are kept by the power of God through faith unto salvation ready to be revealed in the last time.
(KJV)
This text does not challenge the view that Jesus is already King.

Paul is writing about our inheritance, not Jesus' inheritance. Jesus is already king and we await to have our bodies transformed into one like the one Jesus already has.

This is underscored in 1 Corinthians 15 where Paul shows that Jesus is the first-fruits. The fact that we have to await receiving our inheritance does not mean that Jesus has not already received His.
 
parousia70 said:
I find absolutely NOTHING to fear about this, the ONLY prophesied "one world government/religion" found in scripture.
I am inclined to agree. Where, precisely do people think the scriptures tell us about a "world government" that we are to fear?
 
glorydaz said:
veteran said:
Our Lord Jesus Christ has ALWAYS been The KING. He didn't just start becoming The KING after The Father raised Him from the dead and ascended to Heaven.
You don't think the Kingdom refers to the House of Israel and the Throne of David?
Matthew 21:5 said:
Tell ye the daughter of Sion, Behold, thy King cometh unto thee, meek, and sitting upon an ass, and a colt the foal of an ass.
The kingdom Jesus brought in set Him over a house not made with hands.
The Israel of God....the church, as I read the Word.

David was told he would be sleeping with his fathers when his seed would establish his kingdom.
If the kingdom was established after the resurrection of the saints, David would be glorified and see it's establishment. I believe this refers to Christ's first coming.
[quote="2 Samuel 7:12":1ipk4l33]And when thy days be fulfilled, and thou shalt sleep with thy fathers, I will set up thy seed after thee, which shall proceed out of thy bowels, and I will establish his kingdom.
[/quote:1ipk4l33]

Yes I do believe the kingdom refers to both the "house of Israel" and the Throne of David, on earth. Did you forget that last part about David's Throne, being on earth?

If you only study The New Testament Books about that kingdom and throne, you won't have the whole picture; for there is MUCH prophecy in the Old Testament prophets about it that has yet to come pass today. The two sticks prophecy in Ezekiel 37 is one example of that.
 
parousia70 said:
Vic C. said:
A one world government shouldn't concern us as much as a one world religion. :shocked!

Interesting...

The only "one world government/religion" I know of that is prophesied in scripture is this one:

Isaiah 9:6 For unto us a Child is born,
Unto us a Son is given;
And the government will be upon His shoulder.
And His name will be called
Wonderful, Counselor, Mighty God,
Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace.
7 Of the increase of His government and peace
There will be no end,
Upon the throne of David and over His kingdom,
To order it and establish it with judgment and justice
From that time forward, even forever.
The zeal of the Lord of hosts will perform this.

I find absolutely NOTHING to fear about this, the ONLY prophesied "one world government/religion" found in scripture.

That's an interesting twist, because our Lord Jesus defined the world beast system of Rev.13:1 in Rev.17, and He even gave comparisons to it with the old world beast kingdoms of Daniel 7 in the next verse of Rev.13:2. Sounds like you deny the existence of those old historical beast kingdoms of Daniel, which also speaks of a final one on earth with the ten horns structure, the very one of Revelation 13:1 which is being setup on earth today.

Even the historical Babylon empire which engulfed the land of Israel and the then civilized nations of the world was not to be feared. Fear of a one-world government system over all nations is not going to be the real issue in the end of days. It's false worship that we should be fearful of, and our fear should be about mistakenly falling away from The LORD to worship the fake god that's coming.

The one world kingdom or government systems of old was about that very same idea, false worship. Daniel and his fellows were well taken care of in the Babylon captivity, Nebuchadnezzar even exalting Daniel to be third ruler in the kingdom. It was when the jealous false prophets of Babyon stirred Nebuchadnezzar to make a decree in setting up a false idol image of himself for all to bow to at the sound of the psalter when the actual trial came. What will you do, bow in worship to an idol, or wait for Christ Jesus? Each believer needs to ask theirself that question today.
 
veteran said:
If you only study The New Testament Books about that kingdom and throne, you won't have the whole picture; for there is MUCH prophecy in the Old Testament prophets about it that has yet to come pass today. The two sticks prophecy in Ezekiel 37 is one example of that.
Well if Ezekiel 37 means what you think it means, then we have a big problem - inconsistency in the scriptures. There are so many texts asserting that Jesus presently rules the earthly domain that I could wear out the keyboard addressing them. Here is just one:

But if I cast out demons by the Spirit of God, then the kingdom of God has come upon you

Note the tense - Jesus asserts that the kingdom of God has been initiated for the people to whom He is speaking. Some will argue that this is an "inner kingdom" only. Well, that is anachronistic thinking. The Jews of Jesus time had no sense of a split between the domains we presently call "politics" and "spirituality".
 
Back
Top