Christian Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

OSAS....Not !

JM said:
The assumption of ability is a common mistake when viewing Scripture. Does God command man to do things they can't? Yes He does. (love the Lord your God with all your heart)
Good point - the command is there - oftentimes we just are not able to comply due to fallen nature but it doesn't take away from the fact the command is ever before us.

Thanks JM..

God bless 8-)
 
You don't meet someone for the first time, and call them your best friend.
It is not how it works.

hahaha, some go as far as to say they don't actually have to meet again,
or even stay in touch, but one day they will get married by that person anyway.

it's how I would describe 'robot-logic' still waiting for the first kiss of true love,
while having a doctrine of the realtionship, instead of the actual realtionship.

I think it's the soul that can be set on "positive conditioning" where doctrine
is repeated until it becomes "personal belief" regardless of the actual reality of it.
Doctrine gets "stored" rather than realized. And does not necessarily touch personal
reality. Without direct conequences. I think the Bible uses the word "dead" for it.

Ok, I do have something to say as well, and I got aware of it just a few days ago,
it has to do with man as spirit-soul-body.

Could it be possible that both fractions of understanding here are partly "correct",
and the new testament talks about salvation of the spirit, what is by grace alone,
our human spirit gets quickened by the Holy Spirit, while other scripture references
(the larger parts of) talk about salvation of the soul that includes our personality.

IF refined through the cross, we can keep the soul, otherwise we loose it. It's conditional,
therefore we have a church-age for the process. But never can loose our salvation of
our human spirit, once regenerated. That would need to be determined what this actually
means in reality, and what this "saved without personality" would be like in heaven.
Or if we even can knowingly have a part of it, as 'knowing' is part of our personality, our soul.

working out of soul salvation is work that leads to justification as righteousness,
it's not only just rewards, it's about salvation of the soul. Scripture that relates:

Matthew 10:39  He that findeth his life shall lose it: and he that loseth his life for
my sake shall find it.

What means according to that: The ones that live a life centered in the soul
and a life gratifying the soul will loose their soul, but the ones that accept the cross
with all its prunings and its daily deaths shall find (and keep) their purified soul
in salvation

I think what Luther never really understood, and somehow saw as not belonging is:
James 2:20  But wilt thou know, O vain man, that faith without works is dead?
James 2:22  Seest thou how faith wrought with his works, and by works was faith made perfect?
James 2:24  Ye see then how that by works a man is justified, and not by faith only.
James 2:26  For as the body without the spirit is dead, so faith without works is dead also.

without that however nobody can be pleasing to God, no election to firstfruits, and
most likely no position or reward in the kingdom in heaven. Dead faith is Not guaranteed
to be of value in any way, the soul salvation can be lost (Matthew 10:39 ), where spirit
salvation cannot be lost. But can that become personal in any way for us
or does it return to God at time of our death?
 
JM said:
The assumption of ability is a common mistake when viewing Scripture. Does God command man to do things they can't? Yes He does. (love the Lord your God with all your heart)

Am I able to love God with all my heart? Yes! But by no means am I doing it BECAUSE of the command. I am fulfilling the command by the Spirit. And that, by the same Spirit that Jesus obeyed the commands of his father.
 
Once we are saved, we are always saved. Being a born-again Christian takes about as much work as thanking someone from rescuing us from a burning fire. But those who do not have God's love in their hearts are condemned to work, never reaching their goal just like the myth of Cysyphus. He kept pushing a boulder up the hill and it kept sliding back down upon him. He'll never reach his goal because he is pursuing the wrong thing. People who rely on works to get to heaven are working to get love from God instead of out of love for God. Only the HS can give us the love for God in our hearts which no one can ever jump in and take out. We will thus, die with God's love in our hearts and keep it throughout eternity. :angel:
 
AVBunyan said:
Jay T said:
AVBunyan said:
Dead men cannot and will not choose God
Well....We had better throw out all the Bible verses that have the ring as this one, then...... Jeremiah 29:13 "And ye shall seek me, and find [me], when ye shall search for me with all your heart".
Because what this Bible verse says, is not to someone who already knows God.
Jay - my friend - I understand where you are coming from and can see why verses like this seem to make my position look silly - I agree... but......but....when you get to Paul regarding justification today...

Rom 3:11 There is none that understandeth, there is none that seeketh after God.

1 Cor 2:14 But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned.

2 Cor 4:3 But if our gospel be hid, it is hid to them that are lost:
The above verse says sinners are blinded...

2 Cor 4:6 For God, who commanded the light to shine out of darkness, hath shined in our hearts, to give the light of the knowledge of the glory of God in the face of Jesus Christ.
The above verse says that unless God takes the blinders off nothing happens.

Now Jay - I'm searching to try to reconcile your verses with those -
And I must commend you for that....as most people will accept one Bible and reject the other, instead of blending the verses, to find the one answer that makes both of them fit
[quote:8236d]all I can come up with is that your OT verses are dealing with the Jew as the backlsiding child that could seek and return to God back then - under a different set of rules as compared to today.

Today I see God working in the lives of sinners differently now that Israel, as a nation, has been put on the back burner until God resumes his dealings with them later on during the last half of the great tribulation.

[quote:8236d]Just trying to be honest - In regards to individual justification today - God deals differently with sinners today vs. how he dealt with Israel in the OT.
I believe that this statement is in error.
Because the Gsopel of Jesus Christ started with Adam & Eve.....based on the Bible verse which says: Revelation 13:8 "And all that dwell upon the earth shall worship him, whose names are not written in the book of life of the Lamb slain from the foundation of the world".
As soon as Adam and Eve sinned, Christ stepped in and made the provision of Grace, that they should have another chance, and Christ accepted the death penalty, for their sin at that time.....which was to be executed later.
In other words, The plan of Salvation was put into practice as soon as sin occurred.
The Gospel Message has NEVER changed from the Old Testament, to the New.....as Paul brought out to Timothy.....
2 Timothy 3:15 And that from a child thou hast known the holy scriptures, which are able to make thee wise unto salvation through faith which is in Christ Jesus.
And, only the OT was available at that time.

[/quote:8236d][/quote:8236d]
 
Heidi said:
Once we are saved, we are always saved. Being a born-again Christian takes about as much work as thanking someone from rescuing us from a burning fire. But those who do not have God's love in their hearts are condemned to work, never reaching their goal just like the myth of Cysyphus. He kept pushing a boulder up the hill and it kept sliding back down upon him. He'll never reach his goal because he is pursuing the wrong thing. People who rely on works to get to heaven are working to get love from God instead of out of love for God. Only the HS can give us the love for God in our hearts which no one can ever jump in and take out. We will thus, die with God's love in our hearts and keep it throughout eternity. :angel:

Heidi

Was this in response to my question or to another? In any case I appreciate your position and while I will not deny a person their belief that since they are saved, they will always be saved, I'm interested in your persective of AVB's "Dead men cannot and will not choose God." And for this reason. The church has a common belief, and that is that irrespective of whether man chooses God or God chooses man, man can only end up in one of two places. Now if he goes to heaven he has an eternal reward. But if he goes to hell he has eternal suffering. You see in both cases by my reckoning the person has eternal life. How do you see this?

Regards
 
"So, if you believe in OSAS, tell me this.... do you believe in 'Once Lost, always lost?" - L. Ravenhill

Boo - yeah.... :smt117
 
duncdawg said:
"So, if you believe in OSAS, tell me this.... do you believe in 'Once Lost, always lost?" - L. Ravenhill

Boo - yeah.... :smt117
Late comer to this discussion. Interesting question ...

But I gather OSAS is incompatible with OLAL - OSAS says God is biasing the situation in our favor, OLAL biases to our detriment. Hope that makes sense ...


mutzrein said:
But if he goes to hell he has eternal suffering. You see in both cases by my reckoning the person has eternal life. How do you see this?
Eternal existence in hell is no life ... Jesus contrasted "eternal life" against "everlasting punishment" in Matt 25:26. I always get puzzled when non-believers talk about wanting to be with their friends in hell - I'm afraid there is nothing nice like friendship there. :sad


Blessings,
Lou
 
Simple Mind said:
duncdawg said:
"So, if you believe in OSAS, tell me this.... do you believe in 'Once Lost, always lost?" - L. Ravenhill

Boo - yeah.... :smt117
Late comer to this discussion. Interesting question ...

But I gather OSAS is incompatible with OLAL - OSAS says God is biasing the situation in our favor, OLAL biases to our detriment. Hope that makes sense ...


mutzrein said:
But if he goes to hell he has eternal suffering. You see in both cases by my reckoning the person has eternal life. How do you see this?
Eternal existence in hell is no life ... Jesus contrasted "eternal life" against "everlasting punishment" in Matt 25:26. I always get puzzled when non-believers talk about wanting to be with their friends in hell - I'm afraid there is nothing nice like friendship there. :sad


Blessings,
Lou

Mmmm I think you've picked up on something I wasn't really saying. I'm not saying that people would want to be in hell. I'm saying that if they are suffering in hell forever it would indicate that thay are alive. So if the suffering is eternal, then of necessity they would have to have eternal life. And I wasn't referring to this as something I necessarily adhere to but something that Christendom in general believes.
 
mutzrein said:
Simple Mind said:
duncdawg said:
"So, if you believe in OSAS, tell me this.... do you believe in 'Once Lost, always lost?" - L. Ravenhill

Boo - yeah.... :smt117
Late comer to this discussion. Interesting question ...

But I gather OSAS is incompatible with OLAL - OSAS says God is biasing the situation in our favor, OLAL biases to our detriment. Hope that makes sense ...


mutzrein said:
But if he goes to hell he has eternal suffering. You see in both cases by my reckoning the person has eternal life. How do you see this?
Eternal existence in hell is no life ... Jesus contrasted "eternal life" against "everlasting punishment" in Matt 25:26. I always get puzzled when non-believers talk about wanting to be with their friends in hell - I'm afraid there is nothing nice like friendship there. :sad


Blessings,
Lou

Mmmm I think you've picked up on something I wasn't really saying. I'm not saying that people would want to be in hell. I'm saying that if they are suffering in hell forever it would indicate that thay are alive. So if the suffering is eternal, then of necessity they would have to have eternal life. And I wasn't referring to this as something I necessarily adhere to but something that Christendom in general believes.

Sorry, I should have been clearer - I did a no-no and drifted off to a statement that had nothing to do with you :oops: - I had assumed you are Christian so that statement was really an aside and didn't apply to you.

My understanding is that the Biblical definition of eternal death is eternal separation from God. It's like someone saying "I have no life" - well they're clearly "alive" when they say it. I understand it to be the quality that makes life, not the quantity of 1 or 0.

Much blessings,
Lou
 
Simple Mind said:
My understanding is that the Biblical definition of eternal death is eternal separation from God. It's like someone saying "I have no life" - well they're clearly "alive" when they say it. I understand it to be the quality that makes life, not the quantity of 1 or 0.

Much blessings,
Lou

Thanks for that. So when scripture talks about 'perishing' as is John 3:16 you see that as eternal seperation from God but still being alive (and suffering)?

Regards
 
mutzrein said:
Simple Mind said:
My understanding is that the Biblical definition of eternal death is eternal separation from God. It's like someone saying "I have no life" - well they're clearly "alive" when they say it. I understand it to be the quality that makes life, not the quantity of 1 or 0.

Much blessings,
Lou

Thanks for that. So when scripture talks about 'perishing' as is John 3:16 you see that as eternal seperation from God but still being alive (and suffering)?

Regards

Lets say "aware" rather than "alive". Matt 25:46 would seem to be Jesus explaining what "perish" means.

In Christ,
Lou
 
Simple Mind said:
mutzrein said:
[quote="Simple Mind":ffbb6]

My understanding is that the Biblical definition of eternal death is eternal separation from God. It's like someone saying "I have no life" - well they're clearly "alive" when they say it. I understand it to be the quality that makes life, not the quantity of 1 or 0.

Much blessings,
Lou

Thanks for that. So when scripture talks about 'perishing' as is John 3:16 you see that as eternal seperation from God but still being alive (and suffering)?

Regards

Lets say "aware" rather than "alive". Matt 25:46 would seem to be Jesus explaining what "perish" means.

In Christ,
Lou[/quote:ffbb6]

Do you not think that if Jesus meant that the goats would perish that he would say 'perish' rather than ‘go away to eternal punishment’? Or could it be that what Jesus is saying is something different to ‘perish’.

Regards
 
mutzrein said:
Do you not think that if Jesus meant that the goats would perish that he would say 'perish' rather than ‘go away to eternal punishment’? Or could it be that what Jesus is saying is something different to ‘perish’.

Regards

Yes, I totally agree He meant eternal punishment. But I think the two are not contradictory - besides the fact that Jesus doesn't contradict Himself, the language is not contradictory.

The range of meaning for the Greek word for "perish" is wider than perhaps what we would immediately associate with the English word. For example in Matt 10:6 it is used to refer to the "lost" sheep of Israel - it doesn't mean they were destroyed since physically there were alive, and the disciples were instructed to go to them with the Gospel message so it doesn't mean they were anihilated spiritually either. It is used for "lost" many times in John also. It is also used to mean "die". Clearly, the exact meaning is ambiguous in the context of John 3:16 alone and Jesus didn't explain it there (or John didn't record the explanation).

However, Matt 25:46 makes the meaning very plain and clear. Jesus explains it in clear and direct language. There is a symmetry to Jesus' sentence - eternal life vs eternal punishment. This verse doesn't contradict "perish" in John 3:16, but narrows its range of possible meanings to something unambiguous.

Attempts to give this verse some other meaning than what is plainly said by using OT and other verses that refer to other situations and topics breaks a couple of rules of interpretation - the less ambiguous text should have more authority over the more ambiguous, and the texts closer to the issue have more authority (same chapter, same book, same speaker, same subject all carries more weight), especially when Jesus speaks plainly. The attempt to use Isa 34:10 falls into this trap: Isaiah was using metaphorical language in Hebrew to describe the destruction of a city in the OT. Using that as being more authoritative than Mt 25:46 has serious problems. Besides, there is an easy explanation why Isa 34 really did mean forever literally.

Much blessings,
Lou
 
My children know I lov'em...no matter what I make sure they know by what I've done for them in the past, what I do for them in the present and how I remain faithful to the task of raising them up. I correct or punish them in love, I guide them in love...no matter what happens they'll always be my children and they know that...nothing they do will remove them from my heart, they'll always be my children.

Once a loving father, always a loving father...once saved, always faithful.

jm
 
Simple Mind said:
mutzrein said:
Do you not think that if Jesus meant that the goats would perish that he would say 'perish' rather than ‘go away to eternal punishment’? Or could it be that what Jesus is saying is something different to ‘perish’.

Regards

Yes, I totally agree He meant eternal punishment. But I think the two are not contradictory - besides the fact that Jesus doesn't contradict Himself, the language is not contradictory.

The range of meaning for the Greek word for "perish" is wider than perhaps what we would immediately associate with the English word. For example in Matt 10:6 it is used to refer to the "lost" sheep of Israel - it doesn't mean they were destroyed since physically there were alive, and the disciples were instructed to go to them with the Gospel message so it doesn't mean they were anihilated spiritually either. It is used for "lost" many times in John also. It is also used to mean "die". Clearly, the exact meaning is ambiguous in the context of John 3:16 alone and Jesus didn't explain it there (or John didn't record the explanation).

However, Matt 25:46 makes the meaning very plain and clear. Jesus explains it in clear and direct language. There is a symmetry to Jesus' sentence - eternal life vs eternal punishment. This verse doesn't contradict "perish" in John 3:16, but narrows its range of possible meanings to something unambiguous.

Attempts to give this verse some other meaning than what is plainly said by using OT and other verses that refer to other situations and topics breaks a couple of rules of interpretation - the less ambiguous text should have more authority over the more ambiguous, and the texts closer to the issue have more authority (same chapter, same book, same speaker, same subject all carries more weight), especially when Jesus speaks plainly. The attempt to use Isa 34:10 falls into this trap: Isaiah was using metaphorical language in Hebrew to describe the destruction of a city in the OT. Using that as being more authoritative than Mt 25:46 has serious problems. Besides, there is an easy explanation why Isa 34 really did mean forever literally.

Much blessings,
Lou

I don't really see any ambiguity in John 3:16. It says perish - and that is what it means.

So, I differentiate between perishing and eternal punishment. Those who are not given eternal life as in John 3:16 will perish. Those who try to achieve righteousness by what they do (rather than by faith) are the goats, hence their eternal puishment.
 
Back
Top