handy
Member
One thing I didn't bring up in my previous posts was the text Jesus was referring to, which should be done...any time there is a dispute about what a particular passage means, and that passage includes a reference to another portion of Scripture, it behooves us to look at that portion as well.
Jesus was referring to Isaiah 53:12 Therefore, I will allot Him a portion with the great, And He will divide the booty with the strong; Because He poured out Himself to death, And was numbered with the transgressors; Yet He Himself bore the sin of many, And interceded for the transgressors.
Looking at the referenced text, I see no reason to believe other than what I've already concluded, that Jesus is referring to His upcoming death.
I just don't find it plausable to think that Jesus is trying to help out the Jews trump up charges against Him. Even if it were plausable...it still isn't a very good interpretation of the text given that no other text bears out the idea. We should always use Scripture to interpret Scripture and in this case the Scriptures do not support the idea of Jesus helping trump up charges agaisnt Him. The Scriptures do, however, support the idea that Jesus is referring to His own imminent death and the fact that the disciples would henceforth be on their own...needing money, supplies and yes, even swords.
If Jesus told the disciples to take some weapons with them...even if only two...then this takes the idea of using guns for self-defense out of the realm of what is forbidden by Scripture to what is left up to an individual Christians choice. Certainly no one need to use any kind of weapon for self-defense. But, unless the Bible forbids us from doing so, then there is freedom in the matter. Nowhere does the Bible forbid us from using common sense methods of self defense, including using weapons. This particular text supports the opposite idea.
Regarding "It is enough" in response to the two swords...
First of all, it's impossible to say exactly what Jesus meant, because the Bible doesn't explain it. However, far more plausible to me than Jesus helping trump up charges against Him is the idea that the swords were to be used for self-defense. In a war, all fighters must be armed. In a group of people needed defense, not everyone need be armed...one or two who are equipped is enough to fight off an attacker. Jesus wasn't telling them to equip themselves out as a fighting machine...but, He was going to be gone, they were going to be on their own and they needed to have common sense provisions at hand, money, supplies, and even a sword or two.
Jesus was referring to Isaiah 53:12 Therefore, I will allot Him a portion with the great, And He will divide the booty with the strong; Because He poured out Himself to death, And was numbered with the transgressors; Yet He Himself bore the sin of many, And interceded for the transgressors.
Looking at the referenced text, I see no reason to believe other than what I've already concluded, that Jesus is referring to His upcoming death.
I just don't find it plausable to think that Jesus is trying to help out the Jews trump up charges against Him. Even if it were plausable...it still isn't a very good interpretation of the text given that no other text bears out the idea. We should always use Scripture to interpret Scripture and in this case the Scriptures do not support the idea of Jesus helping trump up charges agaisnt Him. The Scriptures do, however, support the idea that Jesus is referring to His own imminent death and the fact that the disciples would henceforth be on their own...needing money, supplies and yes, even swords.
If Jesus told the disciples to take some weapons with them...even if only two...then this takes the idea of using guns for self-defense out of the realm of what is forbidden by Scripture to what is left up to an individual Christians choice. Certainly no one need to use any kind of weapon for self-defense. But, unless the Bible forbids us from doing so, then there is freedom in the matter. Nowhere does the Bible forbid us from using common sense methods of self defense, including using weapons. This particular text supports the opposite idea.
Regarding "It is enough" in response to the two swords...
First of all, it's impossible to say exactly what Jesus meant, because the Bible doesn't explain it. However, far more plausible to me than Jesus helping trump up charges against Him is the idea that the swords were to be used for self-defense. In a war, all fighters must be armed. In a group of people needed defense, not everyone need be armed...one or two who are equipped is enough to fight off an attacker. Jesus wasn't telling them to equip themselves out as a fighting machine...but, He was going to be gone, they were going to be on their own and they needed to have common sense provisions at hand, money, supplies, and even a sword or two.