What's new
By:
Filters
Christian Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Rev 4:3 contradicts gen 1:1 with proof in images

Science says seeing is only a physical sense, so what would the non physical way of seeing be? It comes down 2 what seeing is about in relation to what is to b seen. Seeing is just a form of observation through the mind. Well the only way 2 see without your body would b to see with your own consciousness without being a body. But even most studies show that even if consciousness is non physical u still can't observe anything as non physical consciousness. So what seeing would be is some form of observation that only physical can do. Non physical can't observe or see. It can only create that which does observe and see which is the physical. They're opposites afterall. They have opposite capabilities. One creates that which sees, one is that which sees.

If the non physical is just a symbolic form of physical, then wouldn't there be some things that the non physical can't do that only physical can do?
 
Last edited:
The root issue is that the non physical being just a metaphor of physical or imitation is what causes confusion about if the non physical is actually able to be seen by human eyes
 
The non-physical can't be observed. Well then how can it observe things if it can't even b observed. U can't observe something unless u can be observed. That's how physics works
 
Truth_is_powerful729292 said:
Science says seeing is only a physical sense, so what would the non physical way of seeing be?
Click to expand...
You can see images when you read a novel without actually seeing what's being described. We can even accurately predict the future by thinking ahead. We quite literally see it in our minds. We see when we dream.
 
Truth_is_powerful729292 said:
But why does something that isn't seeable when looking at it look like something then? It's a contradiction
Click to expand...
The vision transpires in your mind , you are the only one "seeing" it .
One vision I saw I was in a room with 3 other people and they saw nothing but I plainly saw letters on a painting , the letters were in my mind superimposed on the painting .
In the Spirit . A supernatural event from God .
 
hawkman said:
The vision transpires in your mind , you are the only one "seeing" it .
One vision I saw I was in a room with 3 other people and they saw nothing but I plainly saw letters on a painting , the letters were in my mind superimposed on the painting .
In the Spirit . A supernatural event from God .
Click to expand...
That's seeing but that's still seeing physical things. The non physical can't do that because it lacks the components to do it. Once the bible says the non physical created seeing, then it's saying that seeing created seeing. We say seeing things can't create seeing things, so why do we say god can be a seeing things that can create seeing things. A thing can't create its own kind
 
Riven said:
Really? You know, I've heard that there are people who exist that can't actually formulate 3D objects in their minds. Or was it the inability to have an internal dialogue? I can't seem to recall.

Anyways, you're wrong.
Click to expand...
Internal dialogue has to be heard by the mind for it to exist. Studies show it
 
If god is his own senses, then he's his own seeing. If he's his seeing, he is the seeing itself. The seeing itself created seeing things (souls). That's a contradiction
 
Truth_is_powerful729292 said:
That's seeing but that's still seeing physical things.
Click to expand...
There was nothing physical about the letters I saw on the painting . They existed in my mind where God placed them .
Three other people in the room with me thought I was loosing my mind because they saw no letters .
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top