Repentance is a conformation that the wrong was not willful but rather undesirable.
I believe you are distorting scripture to fit your theology.
There is nothing in the scriptures (or logic) that requires repentance to refer only to unwillful sin. Was David's sin of adultery with Bathsheba and his sin of murdering her husband, Uriah, both not willful?
Yet David is the ultimate example of one who sinned intentionally, repented, and was forgiven.
There is never a sin that a Christian would say they wanted to commit, which would describe a false professor.
Nonsense.
There are sinful acts which a Christian might commit even though he knew they are sinful.
He might not want to do it but, he does it anyway. That is an act of free will just as David's adultery and murder of his close friend, Uriah, were acts of free will. David knew better but did it anyway.
RE: (
Num 32:23 But if you will not do so, behold, you have sinned against the LORD; and be sure your sin will find you out.), The passage in which that verse is found has nothing to do with being born again and still struggling with sin. It is more closely related to Gal 6:7; "Do not be deceived; God is not mocked, for whatever a man sows, that he will also reap."
RE: (
Luke 6:44 for each tree is known by its own fruit. For figs are not gathered from thorns, nor are grapes picked from a bramble bush.) The passage in which that verse is found has to do with whether the standard fruit (what a person always does) is good or evil. If a person's normal behavior is sinful then one may properly conclude that the person is not born again.
The same cannot be said if a person's normal behavior is righteous but there is an occasional sin among the acts of righteousness.
Jesus was talking about an entirely different subject.
I find such use of "proof texts" to be deceptive. The truth being taught in the passages from which such "proof texts" are lifted rarely have anything to do with what the topic under discussion. It is a perversion of God's word whether intentional or not, IMO.
I do not suspect that was your intention. You appear to be completely genuine in your faith. But I do point out the fallacy of "proof texting" whenever a verse is taken out of context and used to support a teaching with which it actually has nothing in common.
Slava Bogu
iakov the fool