smaller
Member
- Oct 23, 2003
- 12,380
- 664
All believers hold a form of limited atonement. Some don't even realize they hold it.
None of us (in our right mind anyway) can say or prove the atonement did anything for the devil and his messengers. Therefore 'limited.'
From there though the determinist camps run into a bit of a problem. They really don't know 'whom' God may elect to be saved. So they are confronted with a bit of a problem.
They could for example 'truthful' to their own doctrines hold out the fact that 'atonement' is only for some unknown people in proclaiming the Gospel.
Logic then says that the proclamation of the Gospel should 'rightfully' be made 'in Truth.' (yes, I understand that Paul said he was even OK with Jesus being proclaimed in pretence, but that's another subject.)
The fact is in determinism they really don't know if they themselves are saved unless they persevere to their end. The fact is they don't know in any given gathering of people if one may be elected to salvation, some elected or none elected.
How then is the proclamation made? Truthfully that is? If the determinist position is truthfully applied it would bring a vastly different proclamation that just a broad based open shot. it must logically contain 'ALL' the limitations their positions hold in order to be TRUTHFUL. In an open invitation, the determinist proclaimer is actually not speaking truthfully whatsoever as they don't hold that position.
It's an interesting dilemma to me.
s
None of us (in our right mind anyway) can say or prove the atonement did anything for the devil and his messengers. Therefore 'limited.'
From there though the determinist camps run into a bit of a problem. They really don't know 'whom' God may elect to be saved. So they are confronted with a bit of a problem.
They could for example 'truthful' to their own doctrines hold out the fact that 'atonement' is only for some unknown people in proclaiming the Gospel.
Logic then says that the proclamation of the Gospel should 'rightfully' be made 'in Truth.' (yes, I understand that Paul said he was even OK with Jesus being proclaimed in pretence, but that's another subject.)
The fact is in determinism they really don't know if they themselves are saved unless they persevere to their end. The fact is they don't know in any given gathering of people if one may be elected to salvation, some elected or none elected.
How then is the proclamation made? Truthfully that is? If the determinist position is truthfully applied it would bring a vastly different proclamation that just a broad based open shot. it must logically contain 'ALL' the limitations their positions hold in order to be TRUTHFUL. In an open invitation, the determinist proclaimer is actually not speaking truthfully whatsoever as they don't hold that position.
It's an interesting dilemma to me.
s