Join For His Glory for a discussion on how
https://christianforums.net/threads/a-vessel-of-honor.110278/
https://christianforums.net/threads/psalm-70-1-save-me-o-god-lord-help-me-now.108509/
Read through the following study by Tenchi for more on this topic
https://christianforums.net/threads/without-the-holy-spirit-we-can-do-nothing.109419/
Join Sola Scriptura for a discussion on the subject
https://christianforums.net/threads/anointed-preaching-teaching.109331/#post-1912042
Strengthening families through biblical principles.
Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.
Read daily articles from Focus on the Family in the Marriage and Parenting Resources forum.
So sorry to hear that. I can understand the shock it must be. Tracy and you are in my prayers today as well.You must forgive my absent minded response. A dear brother in Christ and coworker of mine died last night of a massive heart failure. Completely unexpected. His wife Tracy needs our prayers.
You must forgive my absent minded response. A dear brother in Christ and coworker of mine died last night of a massive heart failure. Completely unexpected. His wife Tracy needs our prayers.
I don't see any relevance between my comment and your response. The verse you quoted is in the context of Genesis 1; creation.But do not overlook this one fact, beloved, that with the Lord one day is as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day. 2 Peter 3:8
Which I explained clearly. Again, there are no verses that say or indicate that souls will cease to exist.Your claim was that there is nothing in scripture about anyone ceasing to exist. Psalm 37:10 specifically says the wicked will be no more.
Again, the phrase "be no more" refers to their physical life, not their eternal souls.I see. So you didn't mean to say that there is nothing in scripture about anyone ceasing to exist. Did you mean to say that you can't accept the Bible verses that say that the wicked will be no more? I mean, the Bible clearly states that the wicked will be no more, one is free to accept that or reject it.
Bingo!!In short the doctrine of annihilation eliminates the need for salvation that's what this argument boils down to. no need of salvation no need of Jesus..
tob
(Edited, A&T guidelines: "Once you have made a point, refrain from flooding the forum with numerous posts making the same point over and over with nothing new to support it.")Again, the phrase "be no more" refers to their physical life, not their eternal souls.
No, the verse I quoted was Psalm 37:10I don't see any relevance between my comment and your response. The verse you quoted is in the context of Genesis 1; creation.
How so? Does the Annihilated person become unannihilated at some time and therefore needs no salvation???Bingo!!
First, that phrase I noted IS a clue,(Removed, response to deleted portion of a post). I figured you missed that clue. Second, context is everything, and your putting 2 Pet 3 in wih Psa 37:10 is out of context completely.No, the verse I quoted was Psalm 37:10
You say that you don't see any relevance between your comment "the phrase in a little while should have been a clue" (Edited, ToS 2.14) and my response "But do not overlook this one fact, beloved, that with the Lord one day is as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day".
It's unfortunate that you do not see the relevance the same way I do, since "in a little while" may refer to a day, or a thousand years when the phrase is used in the Bible, since "with the Lord one day is as a thousand years and a thousand years is as a day".
I don't share your opinion. I look at context every time.It's unfortunate that you do not see the relevance the same way I do, since "in a little while" may refer to a day, or a thousand years when the phrase is used in the Bible, since "with the Lord one day is as a thousand years and a thousand years is as a day".
First, there are no verses about anyone being annihilated. So your question is moot.How so? Does the Annihilated person become unannihilated at some time and therefore needs no salvation???
Answering the first objection:First, there are no verses about anyone being annihilated. So your question is moot.
The point is that if one simply ceases to exist consciously, then there really is no need of salvation. Ceasing to exist means no torment, no punishment, etc.
The idea of ceasing to exist is exactly what all atheists believe, which is why it is so difficult for them to come to faith.
I still don't understand why the phrase "eternal punishment" can be applied to your idea of ceasing to exist, because the word "eternal" conveys on-going, certainly not ceasing to exist.
There is no way the phrase "eternal punishment" can be applied to your idea of ceasing to exist. But since you think so, please explain how ceasing to exist can be "eternal". I don't see it.
If this is true, then the doctrine of eternal conscious torment or torture in hell also eliminates the need for salvation.In short the doctrine of annihilation eliminates the need for salvation that's what this argument boils down to. no need of salvation no need of Jesus..
tob
No, not "many". Seems you've obsessed with Psa 37:10.Answering the first objection:
There are many verses that directly say that the wicked will be destroyed and will be no more.
And neither verse says anything about ceasing to exist. your words. Have you ever passed by a auto junk yard? What did you see? Many cars that were "destroyed". Yet, they were still there. Destroyed but existing.That is what annihilated means. But notice that "annihilated" is your word, not mine. I merely believe what the Bible says. Psalm 37:38, Sinners will be destroyed, Psalm 37:20 the wicked will perish.
I think you're still missing the point. If one ceases to exist consciously, then there is NO concept of punishment. How can one experience "eternal punishment" if they don't exist? That is impossible. Yet, Matt 25:46 says there will be eternal punishment.I wholeheartedly disagree that that if a person is to be completely destroyed, they have no need of salvation. On the contrary, they have great need of salvation. If they are not saved, they will be destroyed. What greater need could there be?
Question 1: "so what"??? That is WHY atheists aren't interesting in God. They have nothing to fear. They think they will simply cease to exist. There is no punishment or torment if one simply ceases to exist. That's the "so what".Concerning your third objection, so what if atheists also believe that the wicked will also cease to exist? Does that make the Bible true or false? Do they believe that there is only eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord?
Nope. If one ceases to exist, there is no experience of forever. They don't exist so there is no possibility of punishment. I'm just amazed that you aren't seeing this point.Concerning your fourth objection, being destroyed is eternal punishment because it lasts forever.
This is quite confused. Seems you treat destruction as an on-going process, yet you also believe unbelievers will cease to exist.The destroyed person does not stop being destroyed at some point, they do not "heal up" from being destroyed. It is not a temporary destruction, it is permanent. It is eternal.
What do you mean by "merely" tortured? The FACT of conscious torment is the primary reason for salvation. To be saved from eternal punishment.If this is true, then the doctrine of eternal conscious torment or torture in hell also eliminates the need for salvation.
If a person who will be destroyed if they are not saved doesn't need salvation, then a person who will be merely tortured doesn't need salvation either.