Mysteryman
Member
Not long ago, I was in a conversation with an indivudal about the states of solids, liquids, and gases.
For the most part, when talking about certain objects of substance. We found no disagreements with things such gas, which when compressed and become a liquid. Or solids, such as coal or wood, which is a solid, which can only become a gas. Which means that it has only two states 1. a solid 2. a gas. Just like gas , which has two states 1. a gas 2. a liquid.
Where we finally came into a disagreement, was when we talked about water. :yes
I porceeded to ask this individual as to why water would be any different than a gas or a solid. And why did he think that water had more than two states. Well, to say the least, we could not come to an agreement.
Basically, what this converstaion boiled down too, was this. He claims, as many others do as well, that water is either a liquid, or a solid or a gas.
What I tried to explain to this indivdual, was that the defining statement is such that there is all kinds of confusion about this . It is said, that water has three forms or states 1. liquid 2. solid and 3. a gaseous state. Which btw those with a PHD uphold is true, that water is in three states. I told him how I disagree with this type of thinking/reasoning.
One molecule of water is still H2O and when warm or hot, it is still a liquid in a type of vapor. You no longer can see it with you physical eyes. But nonetheless, it is still a liquid.
On the other side of the picture, one molecule of water , still being H2O, when below freezing is fozen water or a solid, which we would call a crystal.
The individual I was talking with constantly kept to his belief. Which is fine for the most part. But here is where the confusion comes in. He would call water 1. liquid 2. solid and 3. a gas
Well, one molecule of water is not a gas. Never has been and never will be. It is still H2O a water molecule. Either in a liquid form or a frozen form.
I believe that this should be revised, in that water is not in a "gaseous state". The truth is, it is not. It is a vapor, that can not be seen with the physical eye. Certain circumstances proves this to be true. When you see a plane high up in the sky. That which you see is a trail of vapor. The heat of the engines condenses the vapor, making the vapor visible. The same hold true when you have a dehumidifier in your house. It condenses the vapor = water molecules , back into a visible form. Once you condense the water molecules. What you are doing is bringing them together into a larger more visible size. An example of this would be, if you take two drops of water, small drops, and put them on a surface that is flexible, and bring the two small drops so close to each other that they touch. The two then become one - Larger water drop. There are positive and negative charges in a water molecule, so they attrack to each other when condensed. The fuse to make bigger drops of H2O. They then become visible to the physical eye.
Anyone agree or disagree ? Or maybe someone would like to expand upon this maybe better than I have ?
Enjoy the reading, and I am looking forward to any and all comments.
Love IN Christ - MM
For the most part, when talking about certain objects of substance. We found no disagreements with things such gas, which when compressed and become a liquid. Or solids, such as coal or wood, which is a solid, which can only become a gas. Which means that it has only two states 1. a solid 2. a gas. Just like gas , which has two states 1. a gas 2. a liquid.
Where we finally came into a disagreement, was when we talked about water. :yes
I porceeded to ask this individual as to why water would be any different than a gas or a solid. And why did he think that water had more than two states. Well, to say the least, we could not come to an agreement.
Basically, what this converstaion boiled down too, was this. He claims, as many others do as well, that water is either a liquid, or a solid or a gas.
What I tried to explain to this indivdual, was that the defining statement is such that there is all kinds of confusion about this . It is said, that water has three forms or states 1. liquid 2. solid and 3. a gaseous state. Which btw those with a PHD uphold is true, that water is in three states. I told him how I disagree with this type of thinking/reasoning.
One molecule of water is still H2O and when warm or hot, it is still a liquid in a type of vapor. You no longer can see it with you physical eyes. But nonetheless, it is still a liquid.
On the other side of the picture, one molecule of water , still being H2O, when below freezing is fozen water or a solid, which we would call a crystal.
The individual I was talking with constantly kept to his belief. Which is fine for the most part. But here is where the confusion comes in. He would call water 1. liquid 2. solid and 3. a gas
Well, one molecule of water is not a gas. Never has been and never will be. It is still H2O a water molecule. Either in a liquid form or a frozen form.
I believe that this should be revised, in that water is not in a "gaseous state". The truth is, it is not. It is a vapor, that can not be seen with the physical eye. Certain circumstances proves this to be true. When you see a plane high up in the sky. That which you see is a trail of vapor. The heat of the engines condenses the vapor, making the vapor visible. The same hold true when you have a dehumidifier in your house. It condenses the vapor = water molecules , back into a visible form. Once you condense the water molecules. What you are doing is bringing them together into a larger more visible size. An example of this would be, if you take two drops of water, small drops, and put them on a surface that is flexible, and bring the two small drops so close to each other that they touch. The two then become one - Larger water drop. There are positive and negative charges in a water molecule, so they attrack to each other when condensed. The fuse to make bigger drops of H2O. They then become visible to the physical eye.
Anyone agree or disagree ? Or maybe someone would like to expand upon this maybe better than I have ?
Enjoy the reading, and I am looking forward to any and all comments.
Love IN Christ - MM