The Book Of Jasher

[VirginShallConceive]

Neither did I say that "Book of Jasher" is a part of Law of Moses, the prophets, or Psalms nor did Christ say that. It is not available to Jews as of 3rd century since it is not a part of LXX. So, what is your point?

My point is that it is a forgery, and therefore it shouldn't be quoted as scripture.

And . . . what do you mean by "not available to Jews as of 3rd century"? Do you mean at least as far back as the 3rd century? It's not found in the Dead Sea Scrolls, except for maybe the two verses in Joshua and 2 Samuel.

 

[felix]

My point is that it is a forgery, and therefore it shouldn't be quoted as scripture.

And . . . what do you mean by "not available to Jews as of 3rd century"? Do you mean at least as far back as the 3rd century? It's not found in the Dead Sea Scrolls, except for maybe the two verses in Joshua and 2 Samuel.

Actually none of His disciples, apostles and Christ Himself never referred to NT as scripture. Just because you calling and quoting it does not make NT as scripture.

When I mentioned 3rd BC, I was referring to LXX. By 3 BC, Jews had apparently lost the book of Jasher since it is not a part of LXX.

As I mentioned, there are 3 editions of book of Jasher and not all are forgery. With the same logic you rejecting book of Jasher, then with that very same logic, we can also reject Textus receptus / and all KJV - based bibles.