Join For His Glory for a discussion on how
https://christianforums.net/threads/a-vessel-of-honor.110278/
https://christianforums.net/threads/psalm-70-1-save-me-o-god-lord-help-me-now.108509/
Read through the following study by Tenchi for more on this topic
https://christianforums.net/threads/without-the-holy-spirit-we-can-do-nothing.109419/
Join Sola Scriptura for a discussion on the subject
https://christianforums.net/threads/anointed-preaching-teaching.109331/#post-1912042
Strengthening families through biblical principles.
Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.
Read daily articles from Focus on the Family in the Marriage and Parenting Resources forum.
Sure enough. I would suggest all the rest of the 1 Corinthians chapter 14 and starting with verse 27 I'd say is worthy of supporting verse 39.
And especially important I think is this: 27 If anyone speaks in a tongue, two—or at the most three—should speak, one at a time, and someone must interpret. 28 If there is no interpreter, the speaker should keep quiet in the church and speak to himself and to God.
- -
But no one knows what they're saying. To hear it, at least for me, feels false. And according to Paul it is so without someone there to interpret. Lacking that these men should remain silent.
because your post are interesting from either side of a battle and not accusatory at anyone .Why am I posting so much?
eddif
As has been asked of you before Brother Mike and, this from an old Pentecostal, any one in the hospitals in your area?
1Co_14:39 Wherefore, brethren, covet to prophesy, and forbid not to speak with tongues.
I warned you how anti-pentacostal this site is. ah the old Baptist doctrine of the when the word came.it wasn't put together for at least one hundred years after the death of John.
I am sorry people have made you feel that way. imo, they are wrong. I think they put an importance on tongues as an evidence that one is baptized in the Holy Spirit because in scripture when one received the baptism of Holy Spirit scripture says they spoke with tongues and praised God. I don't see it as a must but as evidence.
I see all of this as tongues having ceased.
Do you think all believers should have this gift?
As has been asked of you before Brother Mike and, this from an old Pentecostal, any one in the hospitals in your area?
1Co_14:39 Wherefore, brethren, covet to prophesy, and forbid not to speak with tongues.
I warned you how anti-pentacostal this site is. ah the old Baptist doctrine of the when the word came.it wasn't put together for at least one hundred years after the death of John.
I am sorry people have made you feel that way. imo, they are wrong. I think they put an importance on tongues as an evidence that one is baptized in the Holy Spirit because in scripture when one received the baptism of Holy Spirit scripture says they spoke with tongues and praised God. I don't see it as a must but as evidence.
I see all of this as tongues having ceased.
Do you think all believers should have this gift?
Because it is false. Most of what is witnessed in charismatic churches today is just the entertainment of familiar spirits.
Indeed.
28 But if there be no interpreter, let him keep silence in the church; and let him speak to himself, and to God.
29 Let the prophets speak two or three, and let the other judge.
30 If any thing be revealed to another that sitteth by, let the first hold his peace.
The reality of charismania is that it is seldom if ever along the guidelines received. I've witnessed the practice on very rare occasions as prescribed by Paul above, maybe 2 or 3 times in 3 plus decades of faith and it usually followed on the ground of good solid teaching from the pulpit and multiple (2 or 3 elders, not counting the pastor's) oversight.
And it's great to see you back Brother Mike. I have missed some of our scriptural exchanges in Christ Jesus.Sure lots to catch up on and read, but I read everything, ignoring some of the more unlearned post.
Good to be back.
No need for me to get into a battle with ya.. I was pleased to see you on the who is here roster...
And it's great to see you back Brother Mike. I have missed some of our scriptural exchanges in Christ Jesus.
I heard a pastor/family counselor asked, Do you pray in the spirit? When he said no, I asked him why not? He said he didn't need to because he knew what he should pray for. So Paul prayed in the spirit but he didn't need to?Tongues is praying in the spirit (Man) by the Help of the Holy Spirit. Our spirit-man prays with the Holy Spirit.
1Co 14:14-16 kjva 14 For if I pray in an unknown tongue, my spirit prayeth, but my understanding is unfruitful. 15 What is it then? I will pray with the spirit, and I will pray with the understanding also: I will sing with the spirit, and I will sing with the understanding also. 16 Else when thou shalt bless with the spirit, how shall he that occupieth the room of the unlearned say Amen at thy giving of thanks, seeing he understandeth not what thou sayest?
Paul called tongues a form of PRAY from out spirit, with the help of the Holy Spirit. No believer should want to be void of any form of praying. Our spirit needs fed, and our belief systems comes from our spirit. Praying in the natural is very limited.
So, since tongues is Prayer then to say tongues is passed away, or I don't need tongues is to say prayer needs to be limited now (Because I am such a wiz super genious at praying) and I don't need no help from the Holy Spirit when I pray, I can do it on my own.
Tongues is evidence, but just a small evidence. Paul called it "PRAYING" in the Spirit. That is tongues, and every believer needs this form of prayer.
So, since tongues is Prayer then to say tongues is passed away, or I don't need tongues is to say prayer needs to be limited now (Because I am such a wiz super genious at praying) and I don't need no help from the Holy Spirit when I pray, I can do it on my own.