Don't believe me. Believe the Scripture and the command of God to His covenant people.
Of course, the doctrines you espouse, IMO, are not believable. They're based upon a
translation of the Hebrew text rather than the Hebrew text itself. And I've demonstrated that to be the case.
The force of God's command to His people is still His command to His covenant people to love their brethren ONLY....
This is where I believe your understanding of the Hebrew text is wrong. In Lev 19:18 the command is to love all human beings (without exception) whether they are within or outside Israel's covenant boundaries. Moses explained the meaning of the Hebrew term "רֵעַ" (in Lev 19:18) a few short breaths later, here:
Lev 19:34 But
the stranger that dwelleth
with you shall be unto you as one born among you, and
thou shalt love him as thyself; for ye were strangers in the land of Egypt: I am the LORD your God.
The Hebrew term "אֵת" translated as "with" (KJV bible) means to be "near" or "nearness" and is used with reference to
proximity, not with regards to a shared tribal identity such "brethren" or "brother" that the Hebrew word "עָמִית" is associated with in Lev 19:17.
You are to love "the stranger" as "yourself".
The KJV translation of the Hebrew text in Lev 19:18 simply does not convey this truth to it's reader. Consequently, the results of the translation brings about an unholy dogma that you're advocating for.
That's being a lot presumptuous....
It was in reference to a single king (king James VI of England) who commissioned the revision of the Bishop's bible for the Church of England to use. I used an apostrophe s ('s) to indicate James' possession of the translators duties.
I'm not saying this to be critical of England's king at the time. I suppose he could have spent his efforts on other kingly endeavors. England didn't need another "translation" of God's word (the Hebrew text), they needed to stop living and thinking according to the flesh and to stop acting like tyrants and bullies.
That's a lot presumptuous.
It's really not though. Look at the results of your own understanding of the king's translation. For example, you're here advocating that we are NOT to love others except for those who share a common spiritual identity with us.
And anyone who dares to love a "stranger as themselves" you've equated to committing spiritual fornication and practicing "witchcraft" against God.
This is what you actually believe, correct?
There were only Jacob's descendants in the desert around the Tabernacle. There were no Gentiles who were outside the covenant nearby.
Your response is really not relevant to the meaning of the Hebrew term "רֵעַ".
BTW: I actually enjoy reading your posts. I don't agree with them, that's obvious, but I do find your responses to be entertaining.
OK. Great. It doesn't change anything.
It does though. It changes everything, including your understanding of what the Hebrew text actually says.
Not according to God's command....
I'm using the term "neighbor" according to it's meaning found in the Hebrew text (Lev 19:17-18). Moses tells Israel (in Lev 19:34) what he means by the use of the two different Hebrew terms and Jesus reiterates this understanding in the Good Samaritan story.
There is simply no excuse to translate two different Hebrew words that have two different meanings with a single English word that has one meaning.
I don't fault you for your understanding of the text. I fault the KJV translation that causes you to think like this.
If you'll notice the priest, Levite, and Samaritan were ALL in covenant with God.
Perhaps they were, and perhaps not. Jesus instructed the twelve not to enter into Samaritan cities with the Gospel (Mat 10:5). Which would be rather odd if the Samaritan's were in the same covenant relationship as Israel was. I think Jesus was somewhat ambivalent towards Samaritans in general (Luk 9:51-56). When those of the twelve wanted to call down fire upon the Samaritan cities for their rejection of Christ, Jesus admonished them and said He came to save men's lives, not to destroy them. By Jesus' own testimony, Jesus will save all Samaritans, and without exception.
However, my initial point was that the Priest and Levite were covenant breakers. The lived according to the flesh. They failed to live according to God's command as stated in Lev 19:18, that is: they failed to live according to the spirit of the law. They wanted to live in the flesh of their carnal minds (Rom 8:7), and at enmity with Christ. These are those who not only break covenants but teach others to do likewise, in many ways similar to what you've been advocating for in this thread. They are called least in the Kingdom of Heaven (Mat 5:19).
The Good Samaritan was the only one of the three that "became" a neighbor to the injured man and thereby fulfilled the law of "loving your neighbor as yourself". The Samaritan was the only one to honor the law/covenant wherein all humanity was created "in the image of God" (Gen 1:27), that is: Christ (2Co 4:4), and that all are to be loved, as such, accordingly.
Your observations are in error.
I really don't think so. And your responses have not given me any reason to reconsider my position otherwise.
If you a member of the Church, then you are Christ's Bride. Christ has made His Church betrothed to Him. What's it called when a woman engaged to be married gives her matrimonial love to another man not her husband? It's called adultery. And when a Christian gives holy love to an unholy person that is also adultery.
Everything was created "in Christ" and has been created "for Christ". All are Christ's through creation and by definition are part of the "body of Christ". And this is so for all humanity without exception. The faith OF Christ is what forgives, saves, justifies and sanctifies all people, even unbelievers, and unbelievers of every type and condition. In many ways, it's similar to how an unbelieving man or woman is sanctified by their believing spouse (1Co 7:14), and in like manner Christ sanctifies all in Himself, through His own faith, the faith OF Christ, and He does so even on the unbelievers behalf.
The reason this is true is found within the prepositional phrase "in Him" (a phrase often used by Paul) that uses the Greek term "εν" followed by the pronoun "αυτω" in the dative case. This tells us that those "in" Christ (of which every human being is, including all creation) are also at "rest" in Christ. They're not going anywhere, they're Christ's and for all eternity.
4 Ye adulterers and adulteresses, know ye not that the friendship of the world is enmity with God? whosoever therefore will be a friend of the world is the enemy of God. James 4:4.
The term "friendship" does not imply partaking of the world's works, or it's deeds or to be in association therewith. I think we've been down this road before in another thread, somewhere, so I won't belabor the point further.
In any event, we are not to love the world according to the flesh. Nor are we to know any human being according to the flesh (2Co 5:16). But rather we are to know all creation as created in and for Christ and to treat all humanity as such accordingly.
And don't think you're good to go...
Are you?
I believe I am faithful to Christ in that I proclaim His love for His creation. All of His creation. That includes myself, you and anyone else near me.
The truth is that all creation is already IN Christ, all creation was created through and for Christ, and all creation is held together IN Christ and has objectively already been reconciled to Christ. That is the scriptural truth of the matter.
All creation is included IN the body of Christ, wherein Christ IS called
the head of "every man" (1Co 11:3), not some men only, as some are prone to think, but rather Christ is the head of "all men" (Greek: παντος ανδρος) wherein all make up the body of Christ, of which
Christ is the head, as Paul further shows in Col 1:16-20.