You lost me again but I'm not quitting.
Someday I might understand you and then I will know if I will agree with you. Until then, I stand where I am.
PERF! Wonderful quote....
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Join For His Glory for a discussion on how
https://christianforums.net/threads/a-vessel-of-honor.110278/
https://christianforums.net/threads/psalm-70-1-save-me-o-god-lord-help-me-now.108509/
Strengthening families through biblical principles.
Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.
Read daily articles from Focus on the Family in the Marriage and Parenting Resources forum.
You lost me again but I'm not quitting.
Someday I might understand you and then I will know if I will agree with you. Until then, I stand where I am.
Hi John 8:32 and Doulos Thanks for giving me an understanding of you doctrinal beliefs.
Consider thefollowing
John’s quote
There is NO second chance. However, if God were gracious enough to give a second chanceor a third, WOULD IT ANGER YOU? It angers some and that seems odd to me. If asecond chance would save someone from eternal death, so what? Bottom line:There is one opportunity and only one opportunity for salvation, so all of oursupposes and $1.79 will get us a coffee at Mickey D's.
Take note John ;how is your coffee at Mickey D’s J
“So when those came who were hired first, they expected to receive more. But each one of them also received a denarius. When they received it, THEY BEGAN TO GRUMBLE AGAINSTTHE LANDOWNER.
These men who were hired last worked only one hour,' they said,'and you have made them equal to us who have borne the burden of the work and the heat of the day.' "But he answered one of them, 'Friend, I am notbeing unfair to you. Didn't you agree to work for a denarius? Take your pay andgo. I WANT TO GIVE THE MAN WHO WAS HIRED LAST THE SAME AS I GAVE YOU”
John and Doulos I am trying to balance out your view on the following verses. By the way I don’t believe in a second chance salvation plan myself. However I think God can take the umbrella, atonement, of Christ over anyone he cares to.
For example a new born baby, a person who doesn’t have the mental composites to understand etc. Do you have any thoughts on this!
THE NATURE OF GODON THE JUDGMENT DAY ON THE RESURRECTION DAY
I find it sad today there are many Christians walking around thinking they got it made with God because of their faith. Just like the Jew of Old thinking because they were Jewish they had it made. Kind of puts God in a box! HE CAN TAKE THE UMBRELLA OF CHRIST AND PUT IT OVER ANYONE HE CARES TO.“For
God does not show favoritism” Consider the following. “But IF YOU SHOW FAVORITISM, you sin and are convicted by the law as lawbreakers”
“Religion that God our Father accepts as pureand faultless is this: to look after orphans and widows in their distress”
Indeed, when Gentiles, who do not have the law, do by nature things required bythe law, they are a law for themselves, even though they do not have the law,since they show that the requirements of the LAW ARE WRITTEN ON THEIR HEARTS,their consciences also bearing witness, and their thoughts now accusing, now even defending them.)
"This will take place on the day when GOD WILL JUDGEMEN'S SECRETS THROUGH JESUS CHRIST, as my gospel declares".
“THEREFORE JUDGE NOTHING BEFORE THE APPOINTED TIME; wait till the Lord comes. He will bring to light what is hidden in darkness and will expose themotives of men's hearts. At that time each will receive his praise from God.
As it is, you boast and brag. All such boasting is evil. Anyone, then, who knows the good he ought to do and doesn't do it, sins. “Therefore God has mercy on WHOM HE WANTS TO HAVE MERCY and he hardens whom he wants to harden BUT WHO ARE YOU, O MAN, TO TALK BACK TO GOD?
I think there is going to be many surprises on judgment day!
What’s your take!
Larry
Isa 65:20There shall be no more thence an infant of days, nor an old man that hath notfilled his days: for the child shall die an hundred years old; but the sinnerbeing an hundred years old shall be accursed.
This verse says several things. One thing it says is that there will not be anymore babies born during this time: "There shall be no more thence aninfant of days". The lifespan will be 100 years. At the end of 100 yearssinners will be accursed. And that leads right in to Rev20:13-15, the third resurrection, the resurrection to damnation.
What happens to babies who die in infancy, they are given 100 years to make achoice..
Hi John Good stuff
You said:
Isa 65:20There shall be no more thence an infant of days, nor an old man that hath notfilled his days: for the child shall die an hundred years old; but the sinnerbeing an hundred years old shall be accursed.
This verse says several things. One thing it says is that there will not be anymore babies born during this time: "There shall be no more thence aninfant of days". The lifespan will be 100 years. At the end of 100 yearssinners will be accursed. And that leads right in to Rev20:13-15, the third resurrection, the resurrection to damnation.
What happens to babies who die in infancy, they are given 100 years to make achoice..
The chapter in Isaiah is referencing the New Heaven and Earth. However there will be no death! No death, no resurrection!
Revelation 21:4 He will wipe every tear from their eyes. There will be no more death or mourning or crying or pain, for the old order ofthings has passed away."
Isaiah 65:17 "Behold, I will create NEW HEAVENS AND ANEW EARTH. The former things will not be remembered, nor will they come to mind.
18 But be glad and rejoice forever in what I will create, for I will create Jerusalemto be a delight and its people a joy.
19 I will rejoice over Jerusalem and take delight in my people; the sound of weeping and of crying will be heard in it no more.
20 "Never again will there be in it an infant who lives but a few days, or an old man who does not live out his years; he who dies at a hundred will be thought a mere youth; he who fails to reach a hundred will be considered accursed.
There will be no more marriage in the New Heavens and Earth.
Matthew 22:30 At the resurrection people will NEITHER MARRY NOR BE GIVEN IN MARRIAGE; they will be like the angels in heaven.
And if so there will be children born out of wedlock.
Larry
This is the Great Controversy doctrine of the SDAs.
This is the Great Controversy doctrine of the SDAs.
What does SDA stand for, please? Thanks
Now that did not come out the way it was suppose to
The chapter in Isaiah is referencing the New Heaven and Earth. However there will be no death! No death, no resurrection!
Revelation21:4 He will wipe every tear from their eyes. There will be no more death or mourning or crying or pain, for the old order ofthings has passed away."
Isaiah65:17 "Behold, I will create NEW HEAVENS AND ANEW EARTH. The former things will not be remembered, nor will they come to mind.
18 But be glad and rejoice forever in what I will create, for I will create Jerusalem to be a delight and its people a joy.
19 I will rejoice over Jerusalem and take delight in my people; the sound of weeping and of crying will be
20 "Never again will there be in it an infant who lives but a few days, oran old man who does not live out his years; he who dies at a hundred will bethought a mere youth; he who fails to reach a hundred will be considered accursed.
There will be no more marriage in the New Heavens and Earth.
Matthew22:30 At the resurrection people will NEITHER MARRY NOR BE GIVEN IN MARRIAGE; they will be like the angels in heaven.
And if so there will be children born out of wedlock.
Isaiah gave us this principle...
Isa 28:9 Whom shall he teach knowledge? and whom shall he make to understand doctrine?them that are weaned from the milk, and drawn from the breasts.
Isa 28:10 For precept must be upon precept, precept upon precept; line upon line, lineupon line; here a little, and there a little:
Now for Isa 65, is this part of the NH and NE?
Isa 65:1 I am sought of them that asked not for me; I am found of them that sought menot: I said, Behold me, behold me, unto a nation that was not called by myname.
Isa 65:2 I have spread out my hands all the day unto a rebellious people, which walkethin a way that was not good, after their own thoughts;
Isa 65:3 A people that provoketh me to anger continually to my face; that sacrificeth ingardens, and burneth incense upon altars of brick;
We agree it is not.
Now verse 20
Isa 65:17For, behold, I create new heavens and a new earth: and the former shall not beremembered, nor come into mind.
With the former verses in mind God says that He will create a NH and NE and the FORMER sorrows will not be remembered.
OK, but does everything that follows fall under that?
Now, the NW and NE are at the same time as the New Jerusalem aren't they? Doesn't the New Jerusalem fit into the NH and NE?
Hi John
I said;
John said:
Isa 28:9 Whom shall he teach knowledge? and whom shall he make to understand doctrine?them that are weaned from the milk, and drawn from the breasts.
Isa 28:10 For precept must be upon precept, precept upon precept; line upon line, lineupon line; here a little, and there a little:
Now for Isa 65, is this part of the NH and NE?
Isa 65:1 I am sought of them that asked not for me; I am found of them that sought menot: I said, Behold me, behold me, unto a nation that was not called by myname.
Isa 65:2 I have spread out my hands all the day unto a rebellious people, which walkethin a way that was not good, after their own thoughts;
Isa 65:3 A people that provoketh me to anger continually to my face; that sacrificeth ingardens, and burneth incense upon altars of brick;
We agree it is not.
Now verse 20
Isa 65:17For, behold, I create new heavens and a new earth: and the former shall not beremembered, nor come into mind.
With the former verses in mind God says that He will create a NH and NE and the FORMER sorrows will not be remembered.
OK, but does everything that follows fall under that?
Now, the NW and NE are at the same time as the New Jerusalem aren't they? Doesn't the New Jerusalem fit into the NH and NE?
There are three resurrection and two different judgment periods divided by thousands of years? If the Holy City,New Jerusalem contains only the righteous after the final resurrection, where does the bad guy come from?
Revelation 21:27 and there may not at all enter into it [ NewJerusalem] any thing defiling and doing abomination, and a lie, but — those written in the scroll of the life of the Lamb. YLT
I think you may have taken these verses out of context in Isaiah chapter 28 It is referring to a situation of the proud city of Samaria, the drunks of Israel being trampled beneath its enemies' feet. Verse 3 And then they say in arrogance."Who does the Lord think we are?" they ask. "Why does he speak to us like this?
Are We LITTLE CHILDREN, just recently weaned? “He tells thing over and over one line at a time, one line at a time, a little here, and a little there!" verses 9 and 10
You asked John doesn’t New Jerusalem fit into the New Heavens and Earth. It does however what’s you take on the city. What does it represent?
Larry
Are we little children?
Mat 18:3And said, Verily I say unto you, Except ye be converted, and become aslittle children, ye shall not enter into the kingdom of heaven.
Mat 19:14But Jesus said, Suffer little children, and forbid them not, to come unto me: for of such is the kingdom of heaven.
Joh 13:33 Little children, yet a little while I am with you. Ye shall seek me: and as I said unto the Jews, Whither I go, ye cannot come; so now I say to you.
1Jn 2:1My little children, these things write I unto you, that ye sin not. And if anyman sin, we have an advocate with the Father, Jesus Christ the righteous:
1Jn 4:4Ye are of God, little children, and have overcome them: because greater is he that is in you, than he that is in the world.
I hope and pray God sees me as a little child...
Mat 18:4Whosoever therefore shall humble himself as this little child, the same is greatest in the kingdom of heaven.
Luk 18:17Verily I say unto you, Whosoever shall not receive the kingdom of God as a little child shall in no wise enter therein.
As far as not understanding the context of Isa 28, I think I do
What bad guy? The incorrigibly wicked are destroyed prior to the New Jerusalem coming down out of Heaven. That is the final resurrection in
Rev20:13-15. The Lake of Fire that burns up all evil and purifies the earth.
The next event then is the coming of the New Jerusalem.
Rev 21:27And there shall in no wise enter into it any thing that defileth, neither whatsoever worketh abomination, or maketh a lie: but they which are written in the Lamb's book of life.
This verse does not say there are bad guys lurking around outside the gates at all. What it says is that they won't be there. Of course they won't, they have already been burned up in the Lake of fire.
I’m assuming your taking Chapters 20-22 literally so my questions may seem odd.
Revelation 22 speaks of an ALREADY EXISTING CITY New Jerusalem and those bad guys are outside of it.
Revelation 22:15 Outside [the city] are the dogs, those who practice magic arts, the sexually immoral, the murderers, the idolaters andeveryone who loves and practices falsehood.
“By contrast, judgment is pronounced on those who are unsaved (dogs refers to people; Philippians 3:2”
In what point in time does this judgment commence. Or is it taking place as humanity out lives their lives.
Larry
Hi John
Isn’t Isaiah chapter 28 A MESSAGE CONCERNING SAMARIA/EPHRAIM he penned to a then citation? And not about children of God as you are. I can see your zeal and love for our heavenly Father in your posting.
I believe it’s concerning the child like attitude,” Who does Isaiah think he is," the people say, "to speak to us like this! “ARE WE LITTLE CHILDREN, barely old enough to talk?” Isaiah 28:9 TLB
Isaiah 28:10 For precept must be upon precept, precept upon precept; line upon line, line upon line; here a little, and there a little: KJV
13 So the Lord will spell out his message FOR THEM AGAIN, one line at a time, one line at a time, a little here, and a little there, so that they will stumble and fall. They will be injured, trapped, and captured.
14 Therefore, listen to this message from the Lord, YOU SCOFFING RULERS IN JERUSALEM
Larry
“Are you a Preterist? If so, what I am about to say will be meaningless and we probably can't come to an understanding of each other. If not, let's look at Isa 14...â€
Are welittle children?
Mat 18:4Whosoever therefore shall humble himself as this little child, the same is greatest in the kingdom of heaven.
“Are youa Preterist? If so, what I am about to say will be meaningless and we probablyc an't come to an understanding of each other. If not, let's look at Isa 14...â€
Since you gave mean ultimatum feel free to end our discussion. Thanks for your time!
A brother inChrist
Larry
Hi John
Wow was it something I said!
Did some one tell you that or did you figure it out for yourself. I don’t like to be labeled a preterist, nevertheless aren’t we all too some extent.
Using the term preterist is like saying I am a Trinitarian. They are biblical expressions and not denominations. Unless one wants to say I am a Baptist. I consider myself hopefully a, bible student,child of God with resurrection promises. I never felt the scriptures or what someone had to say meaningless.
Then he rolled up the scroll, gave it back to the attendant and sat down. The eyes of everyone in the synagogue were fastened on him, andhe began by saying to them, "TODAY THIS SCRIPTURE IS FULFILLED in your hearing." Luke 4:20, 21
“Context is the surrounding information, which shows the author's meaning by the text. We only accept double-fulfillments where the Scriptures plainly declare them or justify them.
If we allow or promote double-fulfillments, then why not encourage triple-fulfillments? If we allow or promote double-fulfillments, then we can create any fulfillment we wish”
For example Isaiah said verse 28 said;
"Who does the Lord think we are?" they ask. "Why does he speak to us like this? Are we little children, just recently weaned?
You said
The verse in Isaiah and the one you referenced has nothing to do with each other. Those verses are contradictory. “Since they, [the bad guy], hated knowledge and did not choose to fear the Lord”
Isaiah 28:9
[whom shall he teach knowledge?] This verse commences astatement respecting another form of sin that prevailed among the people of Judah. That sin was contempt for the manner in which God instructed them by the prophets and a disregard for his communications as if they were suited to children and not to adults. Albert Barnes
Isaiah 28:9
What, say they, doth he treat us as mere infants justweaned? doth he teach us like little children, perpetually inculcating the same elementary lessons, the mere rudiments of knowledge; precept after precept,line after line, here and there, by little and little? Imitating at the same time, and ridiculing, Adam Clark
“Are youa Preterist? If so, what I am about to say will be meaningless and we probablyc an't come to an understanding of each other. If not, let's look at Isa 14...”Since you gave mean ultimatum feel free to end our discussion. Thanks for your time!
A brother inChrist
Larry
Twas not an ultimatum, it was simply a recognition of the fact we see things very differently. I do think there is type and antitype, a minor and major fulfillment. Thsi makes it difficult for us to come to an understanding. Sorry, if you are offended.
Over and out.