Christian Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

The Work of Repentance Versus Faith Only

One slight correction on me, I follow Christ,

So, then you're Catholic? :)

I can't speak for you, but I accept your catholic and really don't have a problem with your interpretation of "cooperation". Often when people speak or post stuff in here, I try to look for definition in their meanings; in the context of how they use words, and I see your use of the word cooperation to mean what I might say yield. Cooperate with God, yielding to God.

Ok. Is "yielding" necessary for salvation, or does it prove the "yielder" is already saved? The reason I posted the above verses regarding salvation as a process was not to open up a new topic, it was to prove that in Paul's view what we do is not merely proof of salvation, but actually effects salvation for good or bad. What else could he possibly mean by these verses? If he "is being" saved, as he said, then it couldn't be faith alone that saved him, and he definitely wasn't saved "from the beginning of creation" as Calvin taught. There is still a chance he could "be disqualified" or "perish".

You might see this as a self effort, where as I see it as self evident. It may, or may not be that much of an effort for you, but in any case, I can't explain why some struggle with salvation and some don't, but I do not think it have anything to do with simply how they view it. It's more than that.

Certainly there is effort on our part, but the "will and the work" are gifts from God. It is not known how the "works" effect our soul or where God's effort ends and ours begins. All we know is that our "effort" (or lack thereof) effects our salvation. You can compare it to prayer. We are supposed to pray for the things we desire (as long as they're in accord with God's will), yet God "knows what we need before we ask". Why should we even pray if God already knows all and our future is "predestined"? Will we change God's mind? Because, in some mysterious way, God ALLOWS us to cooperate by praying and in that cooperation, prayers are "answered". In the same way, we are told to "work" and in that work God ALLOWS us to cooperate in our salvation.
 
Ok. Is "yielding" necessary for salvation, or does it prove the "yielder" is already saved? The reason I posted the above verses regarding salvation as a process was not to open up a new topic, it was to prove that in Paul's view what we do is not merely proof of salvation, but actually effects salvation for good or bad. What else could he possibly mean by these verses? If he "is being" saved, as he said, then it couldn't be faith alone that saved him, and he definitely wasn't saved "from the beginning of creation" as Calvin taught. There is still a chance he could "be disqualified" or "perish".

Certainly there is effort on our part, but the "will and the work" are gifts from God. It is not known how the "works" effect our soul or where God's effort ends and ours begins. All we know is that our "effort" (or lack thereof) effects our salvation. You can compare it to prayer. We are supposed to pray for the things we desire (as long as they're in accord with God's will), yet God "knows what we need before we ask". Why should we even pray if God already knows all and our future is "predestined"? Will we change God's mind? Because, in some mysterious way, God ALLOWS us to cooperate by praying and in that cooperation, prayers are "answered". In the same way, we are told to "work" and in that work God ALLOWS us to cooperate in our salvation.

The saved yield to God, or in your case cooperate.

As for Paul; I think your absolutely correct that you proved that you think, or understand, he taught that salvation is a life long process, like a goal to work towards and not something one is made aware of at the point of conversion. Many people have proven their understanding to be this.

However, I can't validate it for you. Only God can do that. and if you feel he has, then you surly don't nee me to agree with it, just as i don't need you to agree with me.

Sorry if I seem a little lazy in my response. It's miserably hot today and my up stairs hobble is about to turn into an oven. let me know if you want me to clarify my theology. I've posted some other stuff since our last exchange on this thread as well that might help. Felix brought up a good verse which I clarified and Ernest chimed in on it as well. Check that out. I'd like to hear your thoughts on it.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The saved yield to God, or in your case cooperate.
And those who don't cooperate lose their salvation.

As for Paul; I think your absolutely correct that you proved that you think, or understand, he taught that salvation is a life long process, like a goal to work towards and not something one is made aware of at the point of conversion. Many people have proven their understanding to be this.

What does this mean?

However, I can't validate it for you. Only God can do that. and if you feel he has, then you surly don't nee me to agree with it, just as i don't need you to agree with me.

I'm not looking for validation, just intelligent conversation.
Sorry if I seem a little lazy in my response. It's miserably hot today and my up stairs hobble is about to turn into an oven. let me know if you want me to clarify my theology. I've posted some other stuff since our last exchange on this thread as well that might help. Felix brought up a good verse which I clarified and Ernest chimed in on it as well. Check that out. I'd like to hear your thoughts on it.

My thoughts are that Paul teaches that salvation is a process, not a one time event. This fact destroys Calvin's argument that we are saved before we are born and we have no say in it. When you cool down, maybe you could clarify your thoughts in light of the verses I posted above. What does "are being saved" mean if it doesn't mean we are in the process of "being saved"?
 
"Repentance theology" has the same issue that "water baptism" theology has ,which is to say...
That both have concluded wrongly that salavation is "Jesus/Cross + something you do = salvation.
And the fact is, nothing but your faith the shed blood of Jesus, his death and his resurrection, can purge, remit, and forgive, your sins.
"without the shedding of blood there is no remission", there is no pardon, no justification, = no forgiveness.

So, here is what destroyed once and for all "water baptism" salvation heresy, ...."repentance salvation" theology, and any other type of WORKS TO BE SAVED salvation attempt that Paul wrote the book of Galatians to expose as false and "cursed".

There was a dying thief on a cross.
According to the words of Jesus, this thief ended up with Christ.
This thief was not water baptised, and he restored nothing he stole after he believed on the Lord.
And he was a "thief", unless the bible made a mistake.
He restored nothing he stole after he trusted Christ, and he was not water baptised after they broke his legs and he died.
He then ended up with Jesus, unless the bible is lying.
I wouldn't count on that.

So, from this, we discover that all theology that states that a death bed conversion is not possible, is false, and all theology which claims you cant be saved without water baptism or that water baptism saves you...is found to be false.....entirely false.

So, if you are trusting in anything but Christ alone through your faith to be saved, you are caught up in a cult theology, a false theology, and i hope you can see the light and escape asap.

Now, if you want to hear a clever liar lie openly, then just listen to one try to explain why YOU have to be water baptised to be saved, while the thief on the Cross didnt have to do it.
Talk about a fog of lies.
You should hear some of the stuff they will tell you to try to dodge, duck, ignore, and deny, the truth.





K

Hi Kidron, please consider this example:
If you are a believer who has not been baptised, the bible describes you as follows:

-you don't have a new life. (You are still in your old life. You have not come up out of the waters into your new life.) (Rom 6:3-10)
-you have not participated in Jesus' death, burial and resurrection in baptism. (Rom 6:4) - You are not in communion with Jesus, so why would you take communion - to remember something you have never done?
-your old self has NOT been crucified (Rom 6:6)
-you are not clothed with Christ. (Gal 3:37)
-you are not united with Jesus. (Rom 6:5)

Now imagine that you were very shy, and had no interest in being baptised in front of a large group of people because you believed that it is not essential for salvation anyway.

Can a person be saved it they are:
-not in communion with Jesus?
-not clothed with Christ?
-not united with Jesus, so by definition are therefore still united with Satan?

Can you imagine God saying to such a person after they have died:
"Well done, partner of Satan. Come be with me, even though you did not obey my commandment to be baptised (Matt 8:18-20), or left behind your old self,
nor clothed yourself or united yourself with my son."

Of course not.

The thief on the cross was not under the new covenant as Jesus had not died, been buried, and raised to new life. The thief was saved under the old covenant because Jesus had the power to forgive sins, which he did on many occasions.

After you have developed faith and believe, repented of your sins, and decided to follow Jesus, your new life in Christ begins with baptism. It is the specific point in time in which you have your sins forgiven, and receive the gift of the Holy Spirt. We are ushered into our new lives, ie are born again, when we come up out of the waters of baptism.
 
And those who don't cooperate lose their salvation.



What does this mean?



I'm not looking for validation, just intelligent conversation.


My thoughts are that Paul teaches that salvation is a process, not a one time event. This fact destroys Calvin's argument that we are saved before we are born and we have no say in it. When you cool down, maybe you could clarify your thoughts in light of the verses I posted above. What does "are being saved" mean if it doesn't mean we are in the process of "being saved"?

Cool. I'm not a fundamentalist. So, what I'm conveying is that I accept your view as your view. It's not mine, in regards to Paul and what he teaches about salvation, or the idea that one can loose it.

One of the qualifying questions I try to ask myself is, does view X negativity effect salvation, or ones relationship to God.

If someone wants to view salvation as a process that's fine. However, what can go with that, "I think", is a lot of guilt because often people who hold this view fundamentally place a high emphasis on their behavior, thoughts and actions. But, this is not an effective argument against it when it comes to the Christian life, because their is a process, right? Is it a process of salvation, or edification? You see it as salvation, I see it as edification. (The process that is)

In any case, we are both going through a process from the time we come to Christ. Notice I said "come to Christ?" I would normally say saved, but if I said that to you it would be a stumbling block in our discussion, since your not saved just yet. :)....little dig to you.

Ultimately I have to lean on two things.
1. My own testimony
2. What the bible says.

I did not seek Christ for say. I did not come down to the front in a Baptist church; I did not accept Christ through peer pressure at Jesus Camp as a child, or participate in the christening ceremony at 12 in the Methodist church. Although I grew up in church, my salvation and relationship with God is not a cultural inclination affixed to me by tradition. I hatted church, did not believe in God and felt that all Christians where nuts.

I found God in a moment of weak emptiness, devoid of self and drained of will. I did the only thing anyone with a knowledge of a God would do at that moment. I prayed to something I did not know or believe in, and that's exactly how I addressed God. "I don't know you, or believe in you, but if if you exist can you just show me? I need something other than myself & I will devote all I know and understand of myself to knowing and understanding you." and I received a measure of faith at that moment which allowed me to see, know, and understand God, whom I'd no clue of prior. at that moment I was converted.

You may see that as cooperating with God, and I think you'd be right. I could say it's yielding to God, and that's true to. But, it's that same measure of faith which has given me the continence to grow in knowing and understanding God even more over time. (21 years now. It will be 22 years in April 2013) I know the moment I received it, to the hour, and I say I was saved at that moment, not sometime down the road.

The process? Well, that faith has grown exponentially. It's been put to the test, over and over and over. It whispers to me "trust in me" Should I marry this woman? "trust in me". I'm afraid. "trust in me" How will I get through this? "trust in me" What am I going to do now? "trust in me" This is not what I planed! "trust in me" I can't do this. "trust in me"......that's the best way I can illustrate it.

I am not in charge of me. There is a part of me that is. There is still me, the old man, but the new man is controlled by something else, something more than the old man that keeps saying, "trust in me". That's Christ Jesus, and the faith given to me by him is the only thing that shapes me. It's not me.

How do I avoid sin? I don't. I am sin. I can't do anything but sin. I'm an expert, but I am saved in two ways. 1. My faith which grows and shapes me, and leads me NOT in to temptation, and 2. His sacrifice which delivers me FROM evil. Christ is changing me and Christ will stand up for me, He has me, owns me, I'm not getting away, going away; I am firmly in his grasp my giving up myself.

I never wanted to know Christ. I just wanted a little guidance, some answers and maybe some direction. What I got was far more than I could have ever known or imagined. I was captured but set free from a prison I did not know I was even in.

Conversely, people hear the word and are drawn to it. They say, "I want that! I want to know God. I want to be God's friend and he mine and I am going to be the best darn Christian ever. God will be pleased with me when he sees what a good person I am. I'm going to work real hard. "

I've no question about my salvation; don't worry about it or question it one bit, and I don't work at it. It's already been done. I could not second guess it if I tried. I look forward to test of faith so I can just watch it grow. And toughs test come. I have a hunger for God's word daily and I consume it as surly as I have to eat daily. It has to be filled daily, not a duty it's just a need, like breathing. I've no rituals I have to think about, no special clothing, or words or actions that I have to perform.

The reason I don't see the teaching of Paul like others might is because I'm not seeking. You can't seek what you've already found. No one finds something and keeps looking. Sometimes I'll loose something around the house and my wife will say; "It will be in the last place you look," :) of course it will.

Earlier I mentioned that I'm not a fundamentalist. We see people trying real hard to live the Christian life and reading through the bible trying to interpret every last word. They stick on passages and verses and highlight their bibles, seeking, questioning, searching and looking. They make promises to God yet they don't seem to accept the promise he's made to them, and they wonder if they are saved. ? seriously? seek and you will find He says. place your trust in me and I will offer you life ever lasting.

We are not perfect people, we are fallen and we are sin. We are not GOOD to be saved, we are SAVED to be good, and this is not something we do, but something done unto us by Him. That's it. Do you have to believe that to be saved? No. You don't. But, you could not believe it and not be saved. I can't say, because being saved means giving up the effort to be.

Luther documented this very understanding. He lived a pious life as a monk. he was either the best darn Catholic ever or crazy, but he'd confess and confess until the priest would kick him out of the booth telling him to come back when he actually has something to confess. Crazy monk!

Later, he went through a time of emptiness also. A time where he;d also given up his effort to be saved and simply accepted it with the faith he'd been given.

He wrote this about it. You'll like this because it touches on what Paul said.

I had indeed been captivated with an extraordinary ardor for understanding Paul in the Epistle to the Romans. But up till then it was not the cold blood around the heart, but a single word in Chapter 1 [verse 17], “in it [the gospel] the righteousness of God is revealed,” that had stood in my way. For I hated that word “righteousness of God,” which, according to the use and custom of all the teachers, I had been taught to understand philosophically regarding the formal or active righteousness, as they called it, with which God is righteous and punishes the unrighteous sinner. Though I lived as a monk without reproach, I felt that I was a sinner before God with an extremely disturbed conscience. I could not believe that he was placated by my satisfaction. I did not love, yes, I hated the righteous God who punishes sinners, and secretly, if not blasphemously, certainly murmuring greatly, I was angry with God, and said, “As if, indeed, it is not enough, that miserable sinners, eternally lost through original sin, are crushed by every kind of calamity by the law of the decalogue [Ten Commandments], without having God add pain to pain by the gospel and also by the gospel threatening us with his righteousness and wrath!” Thus I raged with a fierce and troubled conscience. Nevertheless, I beat importunately upon Paul at that place, most ardently desiring to know what St. Paul wanted. At last, by the mercy of God, meditating day and night, I gave heed to the context of the words, namely, “In it the righteousness of God is revealed, as it is written, ‘He who through faith is righteous shall live.’” There I began to understand that the righteousness of God is that by which the righteous lives by a gift of God, namely by faith. And this is the meaning: the righteousness of God is revealed by the gospel, namely, the passive righteousness with which merciful God justifies us by faith, as it is written, “He who through faith is righteous shall live.” Here I felt that I was altogether born again and had entered paradise itself through open gates. There a totally other face of the entire Scripture showed itself to me.

Do you see what Luther is pointing out?

he tried so hard to be righteous and he finally realized he wasn't and did not need to be, nor could he even be, but that God was the righteous one and through his Love and mercy for us, he paid our debt so that we might be righteous through him, IF we trust him. That is to say believe, but that he offers the faith to us for that, and any "process" of salvation is either a process to seek it, or it's a process of edification IN it after we accept it, and that's faith.
 
he tried so hard to be righteous and he finally realized he wasn't and did not need to be, nor could he even be, but that God was the righteous one and through his Love and mercy for us, he paid our debt so that we might be righteous through him, IF we trust him. That is to say believe, but that he offers the faith to us for that, and any "process" of salvation is either a process to seek it, or it's a process of edification IN it after we accept it, and that's faith.
For us, our works are the expression of our perseverance in the faith through which we were declared righteous when we first placed our trust in Christ. It is only in that sense that salvation is a 'process'. We work because we continue to trust in the gracious, free gift of the forgiveness of our sins that we got in a single moment of time by simply placing our trust in the blood of Christ. But for those who think salvation is given in exchange for the satisfactory completion of work after they trust in Christ their work is quite literally earning them salvation from that point on.

The former is marked by the ever increasing fruit of the Spirit in a person--"faith expressing itself through love". The latter is marked by it's devotion to the externals of the faith--worship styles, baptisms, liturgy, an over emphasis on doctrines and theologies, factions, etc.--the piety of self righteousness.
 
.......... But for those who think salvation is given in exchange for the satisfactory completion of work after they trust in Christ their work is quite literally earning them salvation from that point on.

But, is it really earning them salvation? Are they getting something in exchange for an effort?

This is a rhetorical question that only that type of a "believer" can ask and answer themselves. ;) I'm not here to say they are not saved, and I don't think you are either, just putting it out there.

In the 1500's, In Luther's day, the church would sell you a piece of paper guaranteeing you a spot in haven fully signed and sealed by the pope himself.
 
I did not seek Christ for say. I did not come down to the front in a Baptist church; I did not accept Christ through peer pressure at Jesus Camp as a child, or participate in the christening ceremony at 12 in the Methodist church. Although I grew up in church, my salvation and relationship with God is not a cultural inclination affixed to me by tradition. I hatted church, did not believe in God and felt that all Christians where nuts.

I found God in a moment of weak emptiness, devoid of self and drained of will. I did the only thing anyone with a knowledge of a God would do at that moment. I prayed to something I did not know or believe in, and that's exactly how I addressed God. "I don't know you, or believe in you, but if if you exist can you just show me? I need something other than myself & I will devote all I know and understand of myself to knowing and understanding you." and I received a measure of faith at that moment which allowed me to see, know, and understand God, whom I'd no clue of prior. at that moment I was converted.

Interesting. I came to know God in Christ along a similar path to your own, though with an ambivalent approach to traditional church.

Discussed with many who have a similar 'experience.' Call it what we will.

God does seem to put many in a position of void and weakness to show Himself to them in a real and living way. Seems a person with nothing has nothing to lose.

1 Cor. 1:
26 For ye see your calling, brethren, how that not many wise men after the flesh, not many mighty, not many noble, are called:
27 But God hath chosen the foolish things of the world to confound the wise; and God hath chosen the weak things of the world to confound the things which are mighty;
28 And base things of the world, and things which are despised, hath God chosen, yea, and things which are not, to bring to nought things that are:


s
 
Ultimately I have to lean on two things.
1. My own testimony
2. What the bible says.



I found God in a moment of weak emptiness, devoid of self and drained of will. I did the only thing anyone with a knowledge of a God would do at that moment. I prayed to something I did not know or believe in, and that's exactly how I addressed God. "I don't know you, or believe in you, but if if you exist can you just show me? I need something other than myself & I will devote all I know and understand of myself to knowing and understanding you." and I received a measure of faith at that moment which allowed me to see, know, and understand God, whom I'd no clue of prior. at that moment I was converted.

You say you lean on what the bible says, but where does the bible say people are saved in the manner you described here? When Peter's listeners in Acts 2 asked what they must do, did Peter respond by saying for them to "pray in unbelief and put some onus or demand upon God to prove His existence and you shall receive faith and be saved."?
 
But, is it really earning them salvation? Are they getting something in exchange for an effort?
It's not earning them anything toward salvation. There is no payment of salvation paid to someone in exchange for good behavior. No such thing.


I'm not here to say they are not saved, and I don't think you are either...
You're right, I'm not.

I got caught in the works salvation mentality not too long after getting saved. It really was a case of "After beginning with the Spirit, are you now trying to attain your goal by human effort?" (Galatians 3:3 NIV1984). God delivered me from that kind of mindset and taught me real truth about how to relate to him in faith, not works when I cried out to him from the fear and frustration of the works relationship I had with him. Ultimately, what a works mentality means to a genuine Christian is they will not mature. They'll look good on the outside, but they won't become what God truly wants them to be on the inside.
 
Jn 6:27 "Labour not for the meat which perisheth, but for that meat which endureth unto everlasting life, which the Son of man shall give unto you: for him hath God the Father sealed."

Jesus said to labour/work for everlasting life which He shall give.

First, Jesus said to work for everlasting life, so that settle the 'work' issue.

Secondly, Jesus said He gives everlasting life, He gives it so it is free, yet He said to labour for this free gift He gives. So this settle the 'works earn' salvation issue for free gifts can and do come with conditions.
 
I agree with you, yes, repentance would require the return of the horse :). It would be an abuse of grace to say, "I'm forgiven now, and I'm keeping your horse" :eeeekkk
So salvation is dependant upon the necessary works of repentance and not faith only for faith only would never return the horse to its rightful owner.
 
Jn 6:27 "Labour not for the meat which perisheth, but for that meat which endureth unto everlasting life, which the Son of man shall give unto you: for him hath God the Father sealed."

Jesus said to labour/work for everlasting life which He shall give.

First, Jesus said to work for everlasting life, so that settle the 'work' issue.

Secondly, Jesus said He gives everlasting life, He gives it so it is free, yet He said to labour for this free gift He gives. So this settle the 'works earn' salvation issue for free gifts can and do come with conditions.
The 'labor', the work of God is this, to believe.

Believing, having faith is not a behavior.

The required labor for God is having faith in Christ's blood.
 
Salvation is dependent on a faith that would return the horse, not dependent on the merit of the work of returning the horse.


A)Salvation requires a faith that includes the work of returning the horse.

B)Returning the horse = work of repentance.

Therfore:

C)a saving faith includes the work of repentance.


There's no getting around it.
 
The 'labor', the work of God is this, to believe.

Believing, having faith is not a behavior.

The required labor for God is having faith in Christ's blood.



Jesus said to WORK for everlasting life: issued settled.

Work (ergazomai) middle deponent (active voice), imperative mood, meaning: an action done, to excercise, to perform. Therefore belief is an action, something done, something performed. Belief then cannot be just some mental acknowledgement or doing nothing.


After Jesus coomands them to work, they ask what work they are to DO. The verb DO poieō active voice, meaning: to actively carry out, execute, perform, the opposite of doing nothing.

After asking Jesus what ACTIVE WORK they were to ACTIVELYdo, Jesus did NOT respond by saying 'do no works' but said the work they were to do is beleive. So Jesus plainly calls belief a work, belief is something performed, done, carried out, executed.

Believe pisteuō, active voice meaning:

1) used in the NT of the conviction and trust to which a man is impelled by a certain inner and higher prerogative and law of soul..... conjoined with obedience to Christ(Thayer)

2) "to comply" Liddel & Scott Lexicon

3) “‘to believe’ is ‘to obey’” Bultmann(1968, 205).

From the bible:

Jn 3:16 Believeth>>>>>>>>>>have eternal life
Heb 5:9 obey>>>>>>>>>>>>have eternal salvation

Since there is only one way to be saved/have eternal life, then belief must be a form of obedience.

Jn 3:36 ASV " He that believeth on the Son hath eternal life; but he that obeyeth not the Son shall not see life, but the wrath of God abideth on him."

In this verse believeth is set in contrast to obeyeth not, so believing = obedience and not believing = disobedience.
 
Jesus said to WORK for everlasting life: issued settled.

Work (ergazomai) middle deponent (active voice), imperative mood, meaning: an action done, to excercise, to perform. Therefore belief is an action, something done, something performed. Belief then cannot be just some mental acknowledgement or doing nothing.


After Jesus coomands them to work, they ask what work they are to DO. The verb DO poieō active voice, meaning: to actively carry out, execute, perform, the opposite of doing nothing.

After asking Jesus what ACTIVE WORK they were to ACTIVELYdo, Jesus did NOT respond by saying 'do no works' but said the work they were to do is beleive. So Jesus plainly calls belief a work, belief is something performed, done, carried out, executed.

Believe pisteuō, active voice meaning:

1) used in the NT of the conviction and trust to which a man is impelled by a certain inner and higher prerogative and law of soul..... conjoined with obedience to Christ(Thayer)

2) "to comply" Liddel & Scott Lexicon

3) “‘to believe’ is ‘to obey’†Bultmann(1968, 205).

From the bible:

Jn 3:16 Believeth>>>>>>>>>>have eternal life
Heb 5:9 obey>>>>>>>>>>>>have eternal salvation

Since there is only one way to be saved/have eternal life, then belief must be a form of obedience.

Jn 3:36 ASV " He that believeth on the Son hath eternal life; but he that obeyeth not the Son shall not see life, but the wrath of God abideth on him."

In this verse believeth is set in contrast to obeyeth not, so believing = obedience and not believing = disobedience.

I can add nothing but AMEN to this post!
 
Cool. I'm not a fundamentalist. So, what I'm conveying is that I accept your view as your view. It's not mine, in regards to Paul and what he teaches about salvation, or the idea that one can loose it.

One of the qualifying questions I try to ask myself is, does view X negativity effect salvation, or ones relationship to God.

If someone wants to view salvation as a process that's fine. However, what can go with that, "I think", is a lot of guilt because often people who hold this view fundamentally place a high emphasis on their behavior, thoughts and actions. But, this is not an effective argument against it when it comes to the Christian life, because their is a process, right? Is it a process of salvation, or edification? You see it as salvation, I see it as edification. (The process that is)

In any case, we are both going through a process from the time we come to Christ. Notice I said "come to Christ?" I would normally say saved, but if I said that to you it would be a stumbling block in our discussion, since your not saved just yet. :)....little dig to you.

Ultimately I have to lean on two things.
1. My own testimony
2. What the bible says.

I did not seek Christ for say. I did not come down to the front in a Baptist church; I did not accept Christ through peer pressure at Jesus Camp as a child, or participate in the christening ceremony at 12 in the Methodist church. Although I grew up in church, my salvation and relationship with God is not a cultural inclination affixed to me by tradition. I hatted church, did not believe in God and felt that all Christians where nuts.

I found God in a moment of weak emptiness, devoid of self and drained of will. I did the only thing anyone with a knowledge of a God would do at that moment. I prayed to something I did not know or believe in, and that's exactly how I addressed God. "I don't know you, or believe in you, but if if you exist can you just show me? I need something other than myself & I will devote all I know and understand of myself to knowing and understanding you." and I received a measure of faith at that moment which allowed me to see, know, and understand God, whom I'd no clue of prior. at that moment I was converted.

You may see that as cooperating with God, and I think you'd be right. I could say it's yielding to God, and that's true to. But, it's that same measure of faith which has given me the continence to grow in knowing and understanding God even more over time. (21 years now. It will be 22 years in April 2013) I know the moment I received it, to the hour, and I say I was saved at that moment, not sometime down the road.

The process? Well, that faith has grown exponentially. It's been put to the test, over and over and over. It whispers to me "trust in me" Should I marry this woman? "trust in me". I'm afraid. "trust in me" How will I get through this? "trust in me" What am I going to do now? "trust in me" This is not what I planed! "trust in me" I can't do this. "trust in me"......that's the best way I can illustrate it.

I am not in charge of me. There is a part of me that is. There is still me, the old man, but the new man is controlled by something else, something more than the old man that keeps saying, "trust in me". That's Christ Jesus, and the faith given to me by him is the only thing that shapes me. It's not me.

How do I avoid sin? I don't. I am sin. I can't do anything but sin. I'm an expert, but I am saved in two ways. 1. My faith which grows and shapes me, and leads me NOT in to temptation, and 2. His sacrifice which delivers me FROM evil. Christ is changing me and Christ will stand up for me, He has me, owns me, I'm not getting away, going away; I am firmly in his grasp my giving up myself.

I never wanted to know Christ. I just wanted a little guidance, some answers and maybe some direction. What I got was far more than I could have ever known or imagined. I was captured but set free from a prison I did not know I was even in.

Conversely, people hear the word and are drawn to it. They say, "I want that! I want to know God. I want to be God's friend and he mine and I am going to be the best darn Christian ever. God will be pleased with me when he sees what a good person I am. I'm going to work real hard. "

I've no question about my salvation; don't worry about it or question it one bit, and I don't work at it. It's already been done. I could not second guess it if I tried. I look forward to test of faith so I can just watch it grow. And toughs test come. I have a hunger for God's word daily and I consume it as surly as I have to eat daily. It has to be filled daily, not a duty it's just a need, like breathing. I've no rituals I have to think about, no special clothing, or words or actions that I have to perform.

The reason I don't see the teaching of Paul like others might is because I'm not seeking. You can't seek what you've already found. No one finds something and keeps looking. Sometimes I'll loose something around the house and my wife will say; "It will be in the last place you look," :) of course it will.

Earlier I mentioned that I'm not a fundamentalist. We see people trying real hard to live the Christian life and reading through the bible trying to interpret every last word. They stick on passages and verses and highlight their bibles, seeking, questioning, searching and looking. They make promises to God yet they don't seem to accept the promise he's made to them, and they wonder if they are saved. ? seriously? seek and you will find He says. place your trust in me and I will offer you life ever lasting.

We are not perfect people, we are fallen and we are sin. We are not GOOD to be saved, we are SAVED to be good, and this is not something we do, but something done unto us by Him. That's it. Do you have to believe that to be saved? No. You don't. But, you could not believe it and not be saved. I can't say, because being saved means giving up the effort to be.

Luther documented this very understanding. He lived a pious life as a monk. he was either the best darn Catholic ever or crazy, but he'd confess and confess until the priest would kick him out of the booth telling him to come back when he actually has something to confess. Crazy monk!

Later, he went through a time of emptiness also. A time where he;d also given up his effort to be saved and simply accepted it with the faith he'd been given.

He wrote this about it. You'll like this because it touches on what Paul said.

I had indeed been captivated with an extraordinary ardor for understanding Paul in the Epistle to the Romans. But up till then it was not the cold blood around the heart, but a single word in Chapter 1 [verse 17], “in it [the gospel] the righteousness of God is revealed,†that had stood in my way. For I hated that word “righteousness of God,†which, according to the use and custom of all the teachers, I had been taught to understand philosophically regarding the formal or active righteousness, as they called it, with which God is righteous and punishes the unrighteous sinner. Though I lived as a monk without reproach, I felt that I was a sinner before God with an extremely disturbed conscience. I could not believe that he was placated by my satisfaction. I did not love, yes, I hated the righteous God who punishes sinners, and secretly, if not blasphemously, certainly murmuring greatly, I was angry with God, and said, “As if, indeed, it is not enough, that miserable sinners, eternally lost through original sin, are crushed by every kind of calamity by the law of the decalogue [Ten Commandments], without having God add pain to pain by the gospel and also by the gospel threatening us with his righteousness and wrath!†Thus I raged with a fierce and troubled conscience. Nevertheless, I beat importunately upon Paul at that place, most ardently desiring to know what St. Paul wanted. At last, by the mercy of God, meditating day and night, I gave heed to the context of the words, namely, “In it the righteousness of God is revealed, as it is written, ‘He who through faith is righteous shall live.’†There I began to understand that the righteousness of God is that by which the righteous lives by a gift of God, namely by faith. And this is the meaning: the righteousness of God is revealed by the gospel, namely, the passive righteousness with which merciful God justifies us by faith, as it is written, “He who through faith is righteous shall live.†Here I felt that I was altogether born again and had entered paradise itself through open gates. There a totally other face of the entire Scripture showed itself to me.

Do you see what Luther is pointing out?

he tried so hard to be righteous and he finally realized he wasn't and did not need to be, nor could he even be, but that God was the righteous one and through his Love and mercy for us, he paid our debt so that we might be righteous through him, IF we trust him. That is to say believe, but that he offers the faith to us for that, and any "process" of salvation is either a process to seek it, or it's a process of edification IN it after we accept it, and that's faith.

There is a lot here, which I would love to comment on, but not an answer to my question. I'll re post it.

"My thoughts are that Paul teaches that salvation is a process, not a one time event. This fact destroys Calvin's argument that we are saved before we are born and we have no say in it. When you cool down, maybe you could clarify your thoughts in light of the verses I posted above. What does "are being saved" mean if it doesn't mean we are in the process of "being saved"?"

You wanted to know my thoughts, now I would like to know yours. How can you believe in a one time imputed righteousness, when Paul clearly says salvation is a process? What do you think he meant by "are being saved"?
 
There is a lot here, which I would love to comment on, but not an answer to my question. I'll re post it.

"My thoughts are that Paul teaches that salvation is a process, not a one time event. This fact destroys Calvin's argument that we are saved before we are born and we have no say in it. When you cool down, maybe you could clarify your thoughts in light of the verses I posted above. What does "are being saved" mean if it doesn't mean we are in the process of "being saved"?"

You wanted to know my thoughts, now I would like to know yours. How can you believe in a one time imputed righteousness, when Paul clearly says salvation is a process? What do you think he meant by "are being saved"?

It's the difference between the deposit and the fulness. The deposit is currently planted in weakness, corruption, dishonor and a natural body.

All those matters of fact will be put off in the fulness.

s
 
There is a lot here, which I would love to comment on, but not an answer to my question. I'll re post it.

"My thoughts are that Paul teaches that salvation is a process, not a one time event. This fact destroys Calvin's argument that we are saved before we are born and we have no say in it. When you cool down, maybe you could clarify your thoughts in light of the verses I posted above. What does "are being saved" mean if it doesn't mean we are in the process of "being saved"?"

You wanted to know my thoughts, now I would like to know yours. How can you believe in a one time imputed righteousness, when Paul clearly says salvation is a process? What do you think he meant by "are being saved"?

My AC man has cooled the house off quite well, so maybe I can get back to this in some comfort.

Again, I'm not trying to persuade you to think about Paul as I do., But let's look at your verses and I'll see if I can shed light on them from my perspective.

The words "Are being" does not nullify predestination. It simply informs what's happening, or taking place to those it is happening to or taking place.

Here are the verses you quoted to say that salvation is a process.

(Rom 2 6-10)
Romans 2:6-10
New International Version (NIV)
6 God “will repay each person according to what they have done.†7 To those who by persistence in doing good seek glory, honor and immortality, he will give eternal life. 8 But for those who are self-seeking and who reject the truth and follow evil, there will be wrath and anger. 9 There will be trouble and distress for every human being who does evil: first for the Jew, then for the Gentile; 10 but glory, honor and peace for everyone who does good: first for the Jew, then for the Gentile.

(1Cor. 1:18)
1 Corinthians 1:18
New International Version (NIV)
18 For the message of the cross is foolishness to those who are perishing, but to us who are being saved it is the power of God.

(2Cor 2:15-16)
2 Corinthians 2:15-16
New International Version (NIV)
15 For we are to God the pleasing aroma of Christ among those who are being saved and those who are perishing. 16 To the one we are an aroma that brings death; to the other, an aroma that brings life. And who is equal to such a task?

(Phil. 2:12-13)
Philippians 2:12-13
New International Version (NIV)
12 Therefore, my dear friends, as you have always obeyed—not only in my presence, but now much more in my absence—continue to work out your salvation with fear and trembling, 13 for it is God who works in you to will and to act in order to fulfill his good purpose.

So the words you pointed out in these verses are "Are being" to say that BEING denotes a process. As if to say, taking place or happening; ie "being".

Let's use that in a sentience. "I'm being lazy", "That man is being silly." Your being ridiculous. " Does the word "being" mean a process here in these sentences? No. It's one or the other. There might be a crescendo but that does not mean what's happening in theses sentences by the word 'BEING" is any less or more than when it started BEING.

Lets try some more; "He's being hired as we speak." "The child is being born right now."

Do these sentences mean a process? Well, sort of, but do these sentences denote something that could not be taking place, or will not take place? No. Not necessarily.

Dose the word "being" mean something the subject is doing them self? No. We can not say that.

We started this discussion talking about infused righteousness and imputed righteousness. Imputed meaning that Christ righteousness is imputed onto us, and infused meaning we are are actively taking part by choice to cooperate with god.

However, Paul is not saying we are choosing to do that as much as he is simply saying that it is happening. Even the word perseverance, or persistence, dose not necessarily mean ones own will to persevere, or to do. It could easily mean something happening out side of ones will and doing so in a persistent state, by a persistence means out side of ones self, onto ones self. And so, this does not add definitive proof to the claim that we do this, or that we "DO" anything, since it could mean being done onto us.

I could swap verses with you, but I'd rather not. I like your verses, but lets consider the idea of a process. Because even if salvation is a process, it's still not of our own doing, but of God's. One of the verses you pointed to say this clearly.

Philippians 2:12-13
New International Version (NIV)
12 Therefore, my dear friends, as you have always obeyed—not only in my presence, but now much more in my absence—continue to work out your salvation with fear and trembling, 13 for it is God who works in you to will and to act in order to fulfill his good purpose.....if Paul where ever speaking to today's Catholic it's right here in this verse. ....I don't mean that disrespectful, but he must have chuckled to himself when he wrote this, because in one sense he's saying keep up the good work folks, and he finishes it off what letting you know who's actually doing it. :toofunny
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back
Top