G
Guest
Guest
- Thread starter
- #61
Simple baseless speculation . You are speculating that God was orbiting around the earth as a light source, that is very creative, but not likely and there is nothing to indicate that it was so !dad said:Simple baseless speculation. If God was the source, moving and hovering around the earth, then we still had day and night. That means a source.doGoN said:Genesis 1, God created light on the first day, the stars and the sun (which are our current sources of light) were not created until the 4th day, so the light which was present from day 1 to day 3 (and even parts of day 4) had no source. Simple!
I told you: as goofy as your magical light! LOL You claim magic, I claim magic ;) There were magical trees and magical days, and I would like to throw in a magical unicorn ! Hahahdad said:The former light was magical compared to what we have today, at least we would consider it so, in this universe state. The plants did not need magic, because they only lived a few days under the light from God, before the sun was made, unlike your goofy, wild, baseless millions of year claims.Oh how nice, but you can assume that God made magical light which traveled almost instantaneously! LOL Very convenient
dad said:That is saying that our universe light was the same, in other words, you claim a same past universe! Prove it. You need more than calling the former light, 'light', and imagining that our light was the same.We can know it as much as we can know that there was a different "magical light"... The only reasoned deduction is that light was light!
No Logic + Self Contradiction = Dad
Yep, you need more than calling the former day "day" and imagining our day was the same. You are saying that the day was the same, in other words, you claim a "same past state universe"! Prove it! Even in the "present" Universe a day is not always the same length, on the North and South Poles a day lasts for 6 months, that's VERY WILD isn't it?!