Christian Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Was Jesus God in the flesh or a Created being?

John here:
Well, I have that poster blocked out it seems? :wink:

But, all of these 'posts' that you are speaking for can get the answer from the one who did raise the dead, and His Eternal answer in Luke 16:31 surely applies to perhaps most of these 'posters'! :sad

Christ/God said: ".. If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead."
 
May I remind you Brad:

6 - No Bashing of other members. Give other members the respect you would want them to give yourself.

7 - Any personal problems with another member, then deal with it through private messages.

: end reminder 8-)
 
jgredline said:
mutzrein said:
jgredline said:
The verdict is in.
Jesus is God, the bible says so.
jg

What's your take on this then JG?

1 Corinthians 15:27.
For he "has put everything under his feet." Now when it says that "everything" has been put under him, it is clear that this does not include God himself, who put everything under Christ.

15:27 God has decreed that all things shall be put under the feet of the Lord Jesus. Of course, in putting all things under Him, God necessarily excepted Himself. Verse 27 is rather hard to follow because it is not clear to whom each pronoun is referring. I might paraphrase it as follows: “For God has put all things under Christ’s feet. But when God says, all things are put under Christ, it is obvious that God is excluded, who put all things under Christ.†With the exception of God, all things are under the feet of Jesus Christ. Soon, He will take control of that which is twice Hisâ€â€that which was given to Him by the Father and that which was purchased by His own blood on Calvary. This is a quick answer. I will check in my greek bible and see what it tells me.

OK - thanks. This is what I don't understand about the way you have reasoned this. If God is excluded, who has put everything under Christ's feet and if Christ is God (by the estimation of some) how is this possible? The way I see it, either Paul did not understand the true nature and relationship between Jesus and his father (who is God) or this mysterious trinity theory which everyone seems to have difficulty explaining, is false.

I'm going to add something here though for your understanding of my position. I've known the Lord for a number of years. From the point of being born again, I attended a variety of fellowships, churches and Christian organisations. Each of them, as I recall, had belief in the trinity and because as a young Christian I accepted what I was ‘spoon fed’ I ate it because it was given to me by those who I believed, knew the truth. They were ‘christians’ after all.

As time went by I held various positions of ‘servanthood’ in these groups. At a particular time through various circumstances I was challenged by the Lord in terms what it meant to ‘know’ Him and as a result God placed within me what I can only describe as a ‘passion for truth.’ I experienced soon afterwards the beginning of the shaking of the foundation of everything I stood on. Everything had to be demolished until only the cornerstone which is Christ remained. And now I know that there is nothing that I am, nothing I can do, nothing I can be without Him, who is my righteousness. When man understands that there is no rightousness apart from the righteousness afforded him by God, which comes by the gift of faith in His only begotten son, then he will know that his salvation does not hinge on ‘correct’ adherence to a doctrine.

Now you may believe and say that acceptance of this trinity is a pre-requisite to salvation. Fair enough – go for it. But while those who make this claim, who, standing on their own self-righteousness say that none may go in (to the kingdom of God) unless they believe it – many are entering the kingdom ahead of them. And why do these also persecute those who have already entered the kingdom of God by saying they have no part in it unless they accept a creed, thereby denying the righteousness they have in Christ. Because they are in effect persecuting Christ WHO IS our righteousness.
 
John the Baptist said:
I DO NOT buy that.

If any one was totally surrendered to Christ, (GOD) they would [[[BELIEVE]]] the [[[ETERNAL GOSPEL OF CHRIST! ]]] Revelation 14:6 first part & Romans 8:14 of [[[BEING LED!]]] Hermeneutics is ALL supplied! Matthew 4:4 2 Timothy 3:16 It is 'that simple'!

Nor does anyone need to talk in the 'tongue of Strong's concordance' using any one of several word suggestions for [one] meaning! You know, pick the one that I,I,I,I,I want. (Isaiah 14:12-14)
Again, see Cain's 'offering' from Genesis 4:5-7.

How in the world could any person think that the Godhead could have an ETERNAL COVENANT & AN ETERNAL GOSPEL, without an ETERNAL GODHEAD is 'way' beyond scripture & is ARM OF FLESH stuff!

And again. the Word of the [[[GODHEAD]]] needs nothing from the arm of flesh!!!
The emphasis is for some, it seems, guess who? :sad

---John


John
I very much agree with what your saying. In particular what you said here.

Nor does anyone need to talk in the 'tongue of Strong's concordance' using any one of several word suggestions for [one] meaning! You know, pick the one that I,I,I,I,I want. (Isaiah 14:12-14)

John
I enjoy your post. :smt048
 
mutzrein said:
jgredline said:
15:27 God has decreed that all things shall be put under the feet of the Lord Jesus. Of course, in putting all things under Him, God necessarily excepted Himself. Verse 27 is rather hard to follow because it is not clear to whom each pronoun is referring. I might paraphrase it as follows: “For God has put all things under Christ’s feet. But when God says, all things are put under Christ, it is obvious that God is excluded, who put all things under Christ.†With the exception of God, all things are under the feet of Jesus Christ. Soon, He will take control of that which is twice Hisâ€â€that which was given to Him by the Father and that which was purchased by His own blood on Calvary. This is a quick answer. I will check in my greek bible and see what it tells me.

OK - thanks. This is what I don't understand about the way you have reasoned this. If God is excluded, who has put everything under Christ's feet and if Christ is God (by the estimation of some) how is this possible? The way I see it, either Paul did not understand the true nature and relationship between Jesus and his father (who is God) or this mysterious trinity theory which everyone seems to have difficulty explaining, is false.

I'm going to add something here though for your understanding of my position. I've known the Lord for a number of years. From the point of being born again, I attended a variety of fellowships, churches and Christian organisations. Each of them, as I recall, had belief in the trinity and because as a young Christian I accepted what I was ‘spoon fed’ I ate it because it was given to me by those who I believed, knew the truth. They were ‘christians’ after all.

As time went by I held various positions of ‘servanthood’ in these groups. At a particular time through various circumstances I was challenged by the Lord in terms what it meant to ‘know’ Him and as a result God placed within me what I can only describe as a ‘passion for truth.’ I experienced soon afterwards the beginning of the shaking of the foundation of everything I stood on. Everything had to be demolished until only the cornerstone which is Christ remained. And now I know that there is nothing that I am, nothing I can do, nothing I can be without Him, who is my righteousness. When man understands that there is no rightousness apart from the righteousness afforded him by God, which comes by the gift of faith in His only begotten son, then he will know that his salvation does not hinge on ‘correct’ adherence to a doctrine.

Now you may believe and say that acceptance of this trinity is a pre-requisite to salvation. Fair enough – go for it. But while those who make this claim, who, standing on their own self-righteousness say that none may go in (to the kingdom of God) unless they believe it – many are entering the kingdom ahead of them. And why do these also persecute those who have already entered the kingdom of God by saying they have no part in it unless they accept a creed, thereby denying the righteousness they have in Christ. Because they are in effect persecuting Christ WHO IS our righteousness.

Smoking Mutz. You are indeed on fire my brother. I can only hope that the words that you have offered will reach those that NEED them.

Amen, my friend,

MEC
 
mutzrein said:
jgredline said:
15:27 God has decreed that all things shall be put under the feet of the Lord Jesus. Of course, in putting all things under Him, God necessarily excepted Himself. Verse 27 is rather hard to follow because it is not clear to whom each pronoun is referring. I might paraphrase it as follows: “For God has put all things under Christ’s feet. But when God says, all things are put under Christ, it is obvious that God is excluded, who put all things under Christ.†With the exception of God, all things are under the feet of Jesus Christ. Soon, He will take control of that which is twice Hisâ€â€that which was given to Him by the Father and that which was purchased by His own blood on Calvary. This is a quick answer. I will check in my greek bible and see what it tells me.

OK - thanks. This is what I don't understand about the way you have reasoned this. If God is excluded, who has put everything under Christ's feet and if Christ is God (by the estimation of some) how is this possible? The way I see it, either Paul did not understand the true nature and relationship between Jesus and his father (who is God) or this mysterious trinity theory which everyone seems to have difficulty explaining, is false.

I'm going to add something here though for your understanding of my position. I've known the Lord for a number of years. From the point of being born again, I attended a variety of fellowships, churches and Christian organisations. Each of them, as I recall, had belief in the trinity and because as a young Christian I accepted what I was ‘spoon fed’ I ate it because it was given to me by those who I believed, knew the truth. They were ‘christians’ after all.

As time went by I held various positions of ‘servanthood’ in these groups. At a particular time through various circumstances I was challenged by the Lord in terms what it meant to ‘know’ Him and as a result God placed within me what I can only describe as a ‘passion for truth.’ I experienced soon afterwards the beginning of the shaking of the foundation of everything I stood on. Everything had to be demolished until only the cornerstone which is Christ remained. And now I know that there is nothing that I am, nothing I can do, nothing I can be without Him, who is my righteousness. When man understands that there is no rightousness apart from the righteousness afforded him by God, which comes by the gift of faith in His only begotten son, then he will know that his salvation does not hinge on ‘correct’ adherence to a doctrine.

Now you may believe and say that acceptance of this trinity is a pre-requisite to salvation. Fair enough – go for it. But while those who make this claim, who, standing on their own self-righteousness say that none may go in (to the kingdom of God) unless they believe it – many are entering the kingdom ahead of them. And why do these also persecute those who have already entered the kingdom of God by saying they have no part in it unless they accept a creed, thereby denying the righteousness they have in Christ. Because they are in effect persecuting Christ WHO IS our righteousness.

Mutz
I just finished reading your post and will respond when I am back. Leaving for bible study right now. I will say this to you however. While we do not agree on a few things, I have he utmost respect for you and what you believe. The scripture you provide for me really challenged me and as I said I had to parapharize it to make sense. I will look at that part of scripture in the greek when I am back and see what if anything I can come up with.
Blessings for you.
Javier
 
wow
I have been gone for a few days and when I come back its been full of action. It will take me a while to get caught up with evverything.
 
jgredline wrote:
15:27 God has decreed that all things shall be put under the feet of the Lord Jesus. Of course, in putting all things under Him, God necessarily excepted Himself. Verse 27 is rather hard to follow because it is not clear to whom each pronoun is referring. I might paraphrase it as follows: “For God has put all things under Christ’s feet. But when God says, all things are put under Christ, it is obvious that God is excluded, who put all things under Christ.†With the exception of God, all things are under the feet of Jesus Christ. Soon, He will take control of that which is twice Hisâ€â€that which was given to Him by the Father and that which was purchased by His own blood on Calvary. This is a quick answer. I will check in my greek bible and see what it tells me.

___

You need to settle in your mind which side of time it is that you have in your reasoning? The Gospel & Covenant of the Godhead are Immortal. They had a plan in place in Eternity when they knew that it would be needed. The plan called for Immortal/God/Christ to become the offering for sin, Son of God. The created Son died as did the first Adam, but Sinless.

How do you think that the Godhead could be accurate with the Truth of 1/3 in Rev. 12 & then the %50 difference in Matthew 25:1-2 if these [in between] were not saved by Faith in their Eternal plan? Compare Hebrews 11:13 for Truth. :fadein:

Romans 4:17's last part of the verse is not only about Honest Abe! :wink:
NO: We need to [REMEMBER] the Book is a total complete book. And what is meant by that is that it takes remembering the conditions. Such as Matthew 4:4-6 with who only has Immortality with the Everlasting Gospel and Everlasting Covenant!

But as far as the language of Son of God being used? It needs to be documented in the memory bank which side of the birth of Christ it is speaking of. (see all of these verses in the K.J.) Such as Psalm 2:7's INSPIRATION of the Holy Spirit & then the same One Inspiring in Hebrews 1:5 There can be NO doubt to when Christ became the Son. Yet. They are not locked into time!

Just one last note. Even in Proverbs 8:30-31 we see the foreknowledge (prophecy) of the Godhead seeing Christ the Son 1000 BC on earth, playing... 'Rejoicing [in the habitable part of the earth; and my delights were with the sons of men.]' This chapter has the most 'spiritual insight needed', :sad for in verse 1 some might even claim that the one who they call God the Father, had a beginning, huh??

---John
 
Back
Top