jmt356
Member
According to Wikipedia:
- Solomon was "according to the Talmud one of the 48 prophets";
- In the Eastern Orthodox Church, Solomon is commemorated as a saint, with the title of "Righteous Prophet and King."
I believe the view of the Orthodox church that Solomon was righteous and a saint is clearly erroneous. The Bible paints the portrait of a man who, though he did receive the gift of wisdom, turned against God and towards idolotry and hundreds of wives and concubines:
King Solomon loved many foreign women, as well as the daughter of Pharaoh (1Ki 11:1). He loved women of whom the Lord said, "You shall not intermarry with them, nor they with you. Surely they will turn away your hearts after their gods†(1Ki 11:2). He had seven hundred wives, princesses, and three hundred concubines; and his wives turned his heart after other gods; and his heart was not loyal to the Lord (1Ki 11:3-4).
Solomon built a high place for Chemosh, the god of Moab, and for Molech, the god of Ammon (1Ki 11:7), so God became angry with Solomon (1Ki 11:9) and said to him, "Because you have done this, and have not kept My covenant and My statutes, which I have commanded you, I will surely tear the kingdom away from you and give it to your servant. Nevertheless I will not do it in your days, for the sake of your father David; I will tear it out of the hand of your son. However I will not tear away the whole kingdom; I will give one tribe to your son for the sake of my servant David, and for the sake of Jerusalem which I have chosen" (1Ki 11:11-13).
Solomon was thus the reason for the division of Israel and one may also conclude that he was ultimately the cause of the destruction and loss of the ten tribes of the Northern Kingdom.
I do not have much of an issue concluding that the Eastern Orthodox position may be wrong on Solomon. However, what is disturbing is that he is "according to the Talmud one of the 48 prophets." Is this true? What do Protestants believe?
I tend to ascribe to the Muslim view that prophets do not engage in deadly sins. This is why the great sinners, idolotors and drunkards such as Noah, Lot, Solomon, etc., were patriarchs and kings rather than prophets. In contrast, Isaiah, Jeremiah, Ezekiel, etc., were prophets who did not engage in mortal sins (all have some sin, but not all engage in the mortal sins of fornication, idolatry, drunkennees, covetessness, etc., of 1Co 6:9-11).
However, if Solomon was a prophet, then my whole theory gets thrown off. So was he really a prophet according to the Talmud?
- Solomon was "according to the Talmud one of the 48 prophets";
- In the Eastern Orthodox Church, Solomon is commemorated as a saint, with the title of "Righteous Prophet and King."
I believe the view of the Orthodox church that Solomon was righteous and a saint is clearly erroneous. The Bible paints the portrait of a man who, though he did receive the gift of wisdom, turned against God and towards idolotry and hundreds of wives and concubines:
King Solomon loved many foreign women, as well as the daughter of Pharaoh (1Ki 11:1). He loved women of whom the Lord said, "You shall not intermarry with them, nor they with you. Surely they will turn away your hearts after their gods†(1Ki 11:2). He had seven hundred wives, princesses, and three hundred concubines; and his wives turned his heart after other gods; and his heart was not loyal to the Lord (1Ki 11:3-4).
Solomon built a high place for Chemosh, the god of Moab, and for Molech, the god of Ammon (1Ki 11:7), so God became angry with Solomon (1Ki 11:9) and said to him, "Because you have done this, and have not kept My covenant and My statutes, which I have commanded you, I will surely tear the kingdom away from you and give it to your servant. Nevertheless I will not do it in your days, for the sake of your father David; I will tear it out of the hand of your son. However I will not tear away the whole kingdom; I will give one tribe to your son for the sake of my servant David, and for the sake of Jerusalem which I have chosen" (1Ki 11:11-13).
Solomon was thus the reason for the division of Israel and one may also conclude that he was ultimately the cause of the destruction and loss of the ten tribes of the Northern Kingdom.
I do not have much of an issue concluding that the Eastern Orthodox position may be wrong on Solomon. However, what is disturbing is that he is "according to the Talmud one of the 48 prophets." Is this true? What do Protestants believe?
I tend to ascribe to the Muslim view that prophets do not engage in deadly sins. This is why the great sinners, idolotors and drunkards such as Noah, Lot, Solomon, etc., were patriarchs and kings rather than prophets. In contrast, Isaiah, Jeremiah, Ezekiel, etc., were prophets who did not engage in mortal sins (all have some sin, but not all engage in the mortal sins of fornication, idolatry, drunkennees, covetessness, etc., of 1Co 6:9-11).
However, if Solomon was a prophet, then my whole theory gets thrown off. So was he really a prophet according to the Talmud?