Well, do you think we should have allowed Nazi Germany with Adolf Hitler leading it to get the bomb and use it. Of course not, you try to keep such things from happening as far as you can.
Look, the issue that I'm bringing up doesn't have anything to do with what I think that you think people should be 'allowed' to do. Do you think that people should be allowed to gamble? Do you think that people should be allowed to have immoral sexual relations?
People groups have differences all the time all over the globe and are often at war over some other nation telling them that they can't do what they're doing. Ukraine and Russia are fighting because Russia wanted to make Ukraine give up some of its claimed land. Ukraine refused and war came of it. They were two countries trying to impose their will on the other. Israel wants any possible trace of the group known as Hamas out of the territory that is completely inside their own borders. They are at war now to impose the will of Israel against the will of their people, or at least those who are in charge of their fighting forces. Hamas being in the territory of Gaza is the same thing as the greatest early war maneuver of the Trojan Horse. Set up your enemy within the very midst of your cities.
My issue is about whether or not any nation really has the right and authority to tell another nation what they can do. And not just on things that nobody does, but on things that other people groups of the world get to do? My issue is that I'm trying to look at it from the other side. Of course we can! So, I'm the leader of a nation in the middle east and I know that the people of my nation have always had a contentious relationship. With claims of attacks back and forth for at least the last 75 years.
Now, that nation has more nukes than any other nation on the face of the earth and that nation is the only nation on the face of the earth that has ever used them. No! I don't like the people!! I've been taught to hate them and my religious leader sees them as their being worthy of death as infidels! So, this is me living in the middle east and this is what I'm thinking as the leader of that people.
"I need to be prepared for an attack against us that might include nuclear weapons because my perceived enemy has practically inexhaustible supplies of them and they've actually used them once when they were overpowering a nation."
So then I sit back and I ask myself, "How can I work with this neighbor nation to keep them from continuing to work towards that goal?"
So you think on it and you come up with this idea that this neighboring nation should be bombed into submission because that's sure to give them a feeling of confidence and surety you wouldn't ever use your nuclear weapons against them. Yeah. That's what I'll do! I'll cower them into submission and they'll be just fine and accept that.
Or, you work with and through the leader of that nation to come to agreement of covenant of what each one will and won't work to do. Which is what we had at one time and I understand everyone says it doesn't work, but no one has as yet found any nuclear weapons grade material within the border of that country. So, if that's what their goal is, then something was working to keep them from attaining that goal before. That covenant also provided other nations the opportunity to send in inspectors to see what was going on. Now, they can close any door that they want and are under no agreement to show you anything.
But my overall point is that God hasn't given any of the authority to rule all the people of the world through the desires of one man or even one nation. Nations, by definition are sovereign places where the only rule that counts within their borders is the rule of the person or group that has been given authority to rule over them.
So, I believe that to achieve the goal, at least for any long range planning, we should work with our neighbors as best we can. Of course, God would tell us to do this: Therefore "If your enemy is hungry, feed him; If he is thirsty, give him a drink; For in so doing you will heap coals of fire on his head." Because we have no right to tell another or make another nation do something that it adamantly doesn't want to do. That leads to warlike disagreements.
I'm all for doing what we can to stop something from happening that might be a disaster for others. I just think it can be done through covenants of agreement as we had before. And I know that because I also know that there is no sovereign nation that can by force get another nation to bow to its will through bloodshed and war over something that, as of yet, hadn't even developed yet, the most important part needed for the object that we want to go to war over and kill possibly thousands of people.