Christian Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

What am I supposed to make of John 17:3

Excellent posts Nadab and imagician.

There are plenty of verses that directly contradict the teaching of the trinity, but yet many people who believe in the trinity overlook them.
 
mondar said:
[quote="Imagican
Allow me to ask YOU a question: Did God 'create' His Word? Which came first; God, or His Word?

Joh 1:3 All things were made through him; and without him was not anything made that hath been made.
Do you agree that there was nothing made, that was not made by Christ. He is the creator.

I would agree that [b]Christ eternally "proceeds from" the Father[/b]. In this way Christ [b]had no beginning. He was never created, but eternally proceeds from the Father[/b].

Is there any passage that states that God "created" Christ?

[b]I forget where the verse concern...an actually work on it and not be lazy[/b].[/quote]

There is no bible verse that say's Jesus eternally proceeds from the Father as you put it. Jesus says he's "God's only begotten Son" which is past tense. There was a time before time in eternity that God brought forth a Son from his own person equal like Him in everyway. If what you say is true and Jesus is eternally proceeding from the Father than he would have said He is God's eternally begetting Son but he never said that.

Were you thinking about this Bible verse?

Jesus said unto them, If God were your Father, ye would love me: for I proceeded forth and came from God; neither came I of myself, but he sent me. John 8:42

Jesus said he proceeded forth from God which is past tense.He was born from God in eternity as the greek word for proceeded froth is (exerchomai, to come forth from physically, arise from, to be born of) He is not eternally proceeding from God.

Jesus is not eternally proceeding from Him but His word is

"But he answered and said, It is written, Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that proceedeth out of the mouth of God."Mathew 4:4

Jesus is not eternally proceeding from the Father but His spirit/mind is.

"But when the Comforter is come, whom I will send unto you from the Father, [even] the Spirit of truth, which proceedeth from the Father, he shall testify of me:"John 15:26

Mondar even if one day you might come to the understanding that the trinity is not true and you might believe that Jesus is the actually literal Son of God who has a beginning but is not created and God loves you that much that he actually gave up His son for you and me.
 
sk0rpi0n said:
Excellent posts Nadab and imagician.

There are plenty of verses that directly contradict the teaching of the trinity, but yet many people who believe in the trinity overlook them.

I haven’t been following this thread, so I might quote a Scripture that has already been covered. And I’m not picking on you Skorpion, your post just caught my eyes. The following are verses that require a Divine Trinity by the use of the plural personal pronouns:

Gen.1:26
26And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth.

Gen.3:22
22And the LORD God said, Behold, the man is become as one of us, to know good and evil: and now, lest he put forth his hand, and take also of the tree of life, and eat, and live for ever:

Gen.11:7
7Go to, let us go down, and there confound their language, that they may not understand one another's speech.

Ps.2:2-4
2The kings of the earth set themselves, and the rulers take counsel together, against the LORD, and against his anointed, saying,
3Let us break their bands asunder, and cast away their cords from us.
4He that sitteth in the heavens shall laugh: the LORD shall have them in derision.

Isa.6:8
8Also I heard the voice of the Lord, saying, Whom shall I send, and who will go for us? Then said I, Here am I; send me.

Jn.14:23
23Jesus answered and said unto him, If a man love me, he will keep my words: and my Father will love him, and we will come unto him, and make our abode with him.

Jn.17:11, 21, 22
11And now I am no more in the world, but these are in the world, and I come to thee. Holy Father, keep through thine own name those whom thou hast given me, that they may be one, as we are.
21That they all may be one; as thou, Father, art in me, and I in thee, that they also may be one in us: that the world may believe that thou hast sent me.
22And the glory which thou gavest me I have given them; that they may be one, even as we are one:
 
Can't find the post now, but someone said Jesus was never called "God, the Son," in Scripture. In that exact phrasing, no. But it would still be biblical to call Him God the Son since He is the Son and God.

Jn.8:24, 58....
"I am" is one of the eternal names of God, proving that He existed before Abraham (Ex.3:14-15; Micah 5:1-2; Jn.1:1-2). The Jews understood that He applied this name to Himself, thus declaring His own deity. That's why they wanted to stone Him (Jn.8:59).

Here are some verses that prove the Son of God to be God...
Isa.9:6
6For unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given: and the government shall be upon his shoulder: and his name shall be called Wonderful, Counsellor, The mighty God, The everlasting Father, The Prince of Peace.

Jn.1:1-3
"1In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
2The same was in the beginning with God.
3All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made."
Many focus that Jesus is the Word and was w/ God, but few notice that the Word is God...Jesus is God...or maybe it's been said, I don't know.

Jn.20:28
28And Thomas answered and said unto him, My LORD and my God.
I do recall this verse being used, but seemingly dismissed b/c it came from Thomas' mouth. Jesus also claimed this of Himself (Jn.8:58), and did not correct Thomas.

Heb.1:8
8But unto the Son he saith, Thy throne, O God, is for ever and ever: a sceptre of righteousness is the sceptre of thy kingdom.

And Jesus is the Alpha and Omega (Rev.1:8; 21:6), the first and the last (Rev.2:8), the beginning and the end (Rev.2:8), and the beginning of all creation- The One who began creating all things through the Father (Rev.3:14; Eph.3:9; Col.1:15-18).
 
quote by Imagican
How one can assume from these FACTS that Christ was EQUAL to God is beyond my understanding. A statement from those that did NOT EVEN BELIEVE that Christ was The Son is hardly PROOF of ANYTHING other than their OWN 'lack of understanding'.

Is it really beyond your understanding? I don't think so. You seem like a very smart guy and it's a very simple concept. It's called the rule of kinship. Rabits beget rabbits and their children are equal to them in nature. And humans beget humans and their children are equal to them in nature.

But you say that when God begot His only Son that his Son was not equal to Him having the same nature. I think it's you who have the lack of understanding. They might night have believed that Jesus was the Mesiah but they knew that when the messiah was to come He would be God's Son and be equal to Him
 
XTruth wrote
[/quote]I haven’t been following this thread, so I might quote a Scripture that has already been covered. And I’m not picking on you Skorpion, your post just caught my eyes. The following are verses that require a Divine Trinity by the use of the plural personal pronouns:

Gen.1:26
26And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth.

Ps.2:2-4
2The kings of the earth set themselves, and the rulers take counsel together, against the LORD, and against his anointed, saying,
3Let us break their bands asunder, and cast away their cords from us.
4He that sitteth in the heavens shall laugh: the LORD shall have them in derision.

Jn.14:23
23Jesus answered and said unto him, If a man love me, he will keep my words: and my Father will love him, and we will come unto him, and make our abode with him.

Jn.17:11, 21, 22
11And now I am no more in the world, but these are in the world, and I come to thee. Holy Father, keep through thine own name those whom thou hast given me, that they may be one, as we are.
21That they all may be one; as thou, Father, art in me, and I in thee, that they also may be one in us: that the world may believe that thou hast sent me.
22And the glory which thou gavest me I have given them; that they may be one, even as we are one:[/quote]

Why do these verses require a Divine trinity? You only think they do because you believe in the trinity and you are looking at these verses through trinity goggles. Maybe I can help you look at it from my perspective. Let's pretend that I worship men because I am an ancient eqpytian and I believe my Pharoh is trinity god so I read the bible like this.

"Now there arose up a new king over Egypt, which knew not Joseph.And he said... let us deal wisely with them.."

Ha Ha that proves it my human pharoh god said "let us" so that must be a trinity talking and my beliefs are correct.

Xtruth don't you see how silly that would sound to someone who doesn't beieve in the pharoh trinity god like I do?

Surely God was not talking to himself or any parts of himself when he created men. and He was not talking to the angels as the modern day Arians would have you beleive. God was talking to His only Begotten Son who is the "image of the invisible God" and "the express image of His person"

I know you made alot of other points I just can't get to them right now my lunch break is over. Bye
 
^ Plurality (we, us etc) is used as a form of respect. Semitic languages are not like english.

Furthermore, there is nothing to indicate that God was speaking to Jesus... this is assumed by teachers of the trinity idea.
Besides, its not like the prophets of the OT were clueless for 2000 years, that there were 1 or 2 others making up God.

The instruction they recieved from God was simple... that He is one.

If that wasnt the case, why didnt God say He is triune when he gave the law to Moses?
 
sk0rpi0n said:
"And this is life eternal, that they might know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom thou hast sent."

- John 17:3



Why is God referred to as 'one' and Jesus mentioned seperately as someone sent BY the one true God. This is one of the many verses that make it absolutely clear that God is one and He sent Jesus.

I really dont see any room for ambiguity there...so just how can anyone read that to say "God is triune" and "Jesus is not only sent by the triune God, but also happens to be one of the trinity"?

I know there are other verses that some people like to use to establish their premise of a "trinue" God, but what are we supposed to do with verses that make it explicitly clear that God is one, both in the OT and the NT.

Isnt this a contradiction to the doctrine of "trinity"?


Looking forward to read your opinions on this matter.

Warm Regards.

John 17:3
This means everlasting life, their taking in knowledge of you [The Father, Jehovah, God's personal name, see Psalm 83:18 KJV], the only true God, and of the one whom you sent forth, Jesus Christ [God's son].
 
sk0rpi0n said:
"And this is life eternal, that they might know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom thou hast sent."

- John 17:3



Why is God referred to as 'one' and Jesus mentioned seperately as someone sent BY the one true God. This is one of the many verses that make it absolutely clear that God is one and He sent Jesus.

I really dont see any room for ambiguity there...so just how can anyone read that to say "God is triune" and "Jesus is not only sent by the triune God, but also happens to be one of the trinity"?

I know there are other verses that some people like to use to establish their premise of a "trinue" God, but what are we supposed to do with verses that make it explicitly clear that God is one, both in the OT and the NT.

Isnt this a contradiction to the doctrine of "trinity"?


Looking forward to read your opinions on this matter.

Warm Regards.
No, this isn't a contradiction of the Trinity. It might initially appear that it is but only because it is taken out of the greater context of what the NT says about Jesus. Look even at the immediate context, for starters:

John 17:1-5, "1 When Jesus had spoken these words, he lifted up his eyes to heaven, and said, Father, the hour has come; glorify your Son that the Son may glorify you, 2 since you have given him authority over all flesh, to give eternal life to all whom you have given him. 3 And this is eternal life, that they know you the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom you have sent. 4 I glorified you on earth, having accomplished the work that you gave me to do. 5 And now, Father, glorify me in your own presence with the glory that I had with you before the world existed."

There are several key points that need to be made here:

1. One cannot ignore that eternal life is connected with knowing both the Father and the Son.
2. The Son shared in the glory of the Father prior to the existence of the world. Contrast this to Isaiah 48:11, "For my own sake, for my own sake, I do it,for how should my name be profaned? My glory I will not give to another."
3. The phrase "only true God" is a statement of monothesim, nothing more. It is a confession of the deity of the Father and this in no way is a denial of the deity of Jesus himself.

If one tries to get around a trinitarian understanding of this passage, it will actually lead to a whole lot of trouble.
 
Free said:
sk0rpi0n said:
"And this is life eternal, that they might know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom thou hast sent."

- John 17:3



Why is God referred to as 'one' and Jesus mentioned seperately as someone sent BY the one true God. This is one of the many verses that make it absolutely clear that God is one and He sent Jesus.

I really dont see any room for ambiguity there...so just how can anyone read that to say "God is triune" and "Jesus is not only sent by the triune God, but also happens to be one of the trinity"?

I know there are other verses that some people like to use to establish their premise of a "trinue" God, but what are we supposed to do with verses that make it explicitly clear that God is one, both in the OT and the NT.

Isnt this a contradiction to the doctrine of "trinity"?


Looking forward to read your opinions on this matter.

Warm Regards.
No, this isn't a contradiction of the Trinity. It might initially appear that it is but only because it is taken out of the greater context of what the NT says about Jesus. Look even at the immediate context, for starters:

John 17:1-5, "1 When Jesus had spoken these words, he lifted up his eyes to heaven, and said, Father, the hour has come; glorify your Son that the Son may glorify you, 2 since you have given him authority over all flesh, to give eternal life to all whom you have given him. 3 And this is eternal life, that they know you the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom you have sent. 4 I glorified you on earth, having accomplished the work that you gave me to do. 5 And now, Father, glorify me in your own presence with the glory that I had with you before the world existed."

There are several key points that need to be made here:

1. One cannot ignore that eternal life is connected with knowing both the Father and the Son.
2. The Son shared in the glory of the Father prior to the existence of the world. Contrast this to Isaiah 48:11, "For my own sake, for my own sake, I do it,for how should my name be profaned? My glory I will not give to another."
3. The phrase "only true God" is a statement of monothesim, nothing more. It is a confession of the deity of the Father and this in no way is a denial of the deity of Jesus himself.

If one tries to get around a trinitarian understanding of this passage, it will actually lead to a whole lot of trouble.

Jesus understood and taught that God is:-

Mark 12:29
And Jesus answered him, The first of all the commandments is, Hear, O Israel; The Lord our God is one Lord:

AS Jesus was teaching Jews from the OT & Jews did and do not except the trinity as it is not found in the OT Jesus did not teach it from hear:-

Deu 6:4 Hear, O Israel: The LORD our God is one LORD:

one of the most important teaching texts in The Bible.

The above demonstrates that the God to the Jews was 'One' and not a three part Godhead like that of Christiandom which is also confirmed in the verse its self as the Hebrew word "echad" (one) is in the "absolute" sence, but what does this mean?

For the answer to this we will consider versus scholastic comments on the theology and Hebrew grammar of Deut 6:4 etc.

a) "The Cardinal Numbers are:
With the Masculine
Absloute - $(UÈ . . . The numeral 'one' is considered an adjective ; it follows its noun and agrees with it in gender : 'one man' $(UÈ ;*Æ..."-A Practical Grammar for Classical Hebrew by J. Weingreen, M.A., Ph.D. pp.242-243

b) "The greatest affirmation of belief in one God is expressed in the shema, the first words a Jewish child should learn and the last a Jew should utter as he passes from this life to the world to come:
'Hear o Israel, the Lord our God is one.
And you shall love the Lord thy God with all they heart and with all thy soul and with all thy might.'"-'Six Religions in the Twentieth Century' by W. Owen Cole p.64

c) "His [Isaiah's] most important contribution to Israel's faith is the reiteration of absolute monotheism. The God of Israel is not merely Yahweh, a local god among other deities, but He is the One God, creator and ruler of the world."*
" ... the whole Bible is to a large extent the record of a long drawn-out, but ultimatly successful, struggle for the allegiance of the Jewish people to the purest monotheism and their utter rejection of polytheism with its attendant idolatry."**-'The Jewish People' by David J. Goldberg & John D. Rayner *p.52, **p.235

d) "monotheism n. doctrine that there is only one god. monotheist n. monotheistic adj."-Oxford Dictorary

e) "Judaism rests on two basic doctrines : (1) the belief in the One and Only God; (2) the election of Israel to be the bearers of this belief. Two doctrines, which, which are so inextricably bound together as to from one, receive their classic formulation in the great Deuteronomic utterance, known as the Shema ('Hear!') - from the first word with which it begins, 'Hear, O Israel! The Lord is our God, the Lord is one' (6. 4) - an utterance which has become Israel's ages-long primal confession of faith.
There is no assertion here of the unity of God in the metaphysical sense. The idea of God as pure, simple being, belongs to the realm of philosophy rather than of religion. Nor is there any claim made that one God is only Israel's God and of no other people; this would be contrary to the universalism inherent in Judaism. What is here affirmed is (i) that there is but one God, with none other beside Him; and (ii) that the one and only God is the One whom Israel confesses and worships. The negations are as emphatic and insistent as the affirmations. They negate all embodiments and notions of the Deity which, however refined and sublimated, veil the one and only God of Israel more than reveal Him. Thus are excluded, not only all dualistic no less than polytheistic creeds, but also the 'Trinity in Unity' of Christianity which, however much it may be explained away so as to make it compatible with the one God in the metaphysical sense, remains a direct denial of the only God who, from the beginning, had chosen Israel in His service."-Judaism by Isidore Epstein p134

e.a.) What is the Shema?
"God Is One Simply put, Judaism is the religion of a people. Therefore, a convert becomes part of the Jewish people as well as the Jewish religion. It is a monotheistic religion in the strictest sense and holds that God intervenes in human history, especially in relation to the Jews. Jewish worship involves several annual festivals and various customs. (See box, pages 230-1.) Although there are no creeds or dogmas accepted by all Jews, the confession of the oneness of God as expressed in the Shema, a prayer based on Deuteronomy 6:4 (JP), forms a central part of synagogue worship: “HEAR, O ISRAEL: THE LORD OUR GOD, THE LORD IS ONE.â€Â
This belief in one God was passed on to Christianity and Islam. According to Dr. J. H. Hertz, a rabbi: “This sublime pronouncement of absolute monotheism was a declaration of war against all polytheism . . . In the same way, the Shema excludes the trinity of the Christian creed as a violation of the Unity of God.â€Â"-'Mankinds Search For God' by the W.T.B.S. p.218-9

f) "$(UÈ %&(* v.supra-num. (25) one Yahweh."-'Anaylitcal Key to the O.T.' by John J. Ownes p782

In the above material "One" is numerically one in the absolute, so in the context of scripture and Jewish theology God is one even though "Elohim" is in the plural form or to requote "God. The Hebrew has the plural form, the plural of majesty; but no idea of plurality is to be read into the word, because the verb, created is in the singular (E. [Abraham Ibn Ezra])."-The Soncino Chumash Ed. by The Rev. Dr. A. Cohen M.A., Ph.D., D.H.L. page 1" leaving no room for any form of trinity or the like.

Jesus as a Jew reiterated the correctness of the "Shema" is at Mark 12:29-30:-
"Jesus answered: “The first is, ‘Hear, O Israel, Jehovah our God is one3 Jehovah, and you must love Jehovah your God with your whole heart and with your whole soul and with your whole mind and with your whole strength.’"

3Strong's No. 1520 heis {hice} (including the neuter etc. hen); TDNT - 2:434,214; numeral. AV - one 229, a 9, other 6, some 6, not tr 4, misc 18; 272
1) one

it-2 511 Number ... One. This number, when used figuratively, conveys the thought of singleness, uniqueness, as well as unity and agreement in purpose and action. “Jehovah our God is one Jehovah,†said Moses. (Deut 6:4) He alone is Sovereign. He is unique. He does not share his glory with another, as is the case with pagan trinitarian gods. (Acts 4:24; Rev 6:10; Isa 42:8) There is oneness in purpose and activity between Jehovah and Jesus Christ (Joh 10:30) and there should be complete unity of Christ’s disciples with God, with his Son, and with one another. (Joh 17:21; Gal 3:28) Such oneness is illustrated in the marriage arrangement.â€â€Gen 2:24; Mtt 19:6; Eph 5:28-32.

This as a faithful Jew Jesus Christ would never have taught the trinity as it is not to be found in the OT about "the true God" of John 17:3.
 
sk0rpi0n said:
^ Plurality (we, us etc) is used as a form of respect. Semitic languages are not like english.

Furthermore, there is nothing to indicate that God was speaking to Jesus... this is assumed by teachers of the trinity idea.
Besides, its not like the prophets of the OT were clueless for 2000 years, that there were 1 or 2 others making up God.

The instruction they recieved from God was simple... that He is one.

If that wasnt the case, why didnt God say He is triune when he gave the law to Moses?

Dear sk0rpi0n,
How are you doing?
I very much resent the fact that you implied that I was a trinitarian just because I beleive the Bible that
"...God, who created all things by Jesus Christ:""[his] Son...by whom also he made the worlds"
Ephesians 3:9,Hebrews 1:2

Ephesians 3:9 proves that Jesus is not God because if God created all things by Him then it must mean that Jesus is a seperate person than God. So Trnitarians call me a heretic because I believe that although Jesus and His father are equal in divine nature, they are not equal in age for the Father is unbegotten and older than His Son who was born from His person in eternity.

I am not an expert on Semitic languages but I do know that when God is talking about himself He uses singular pronouns.
" ...I have sworn by MYSELF, says Yahweh...""...I Yahweh, have spoken, surely this will I do it... "
Gen22:16;Num 14:35 World English Bible

And when God talks to someone else other than himself then he uses the plural pronouns "let us"
"Come now, and LET US reason together," says Yahweh: "Though your sins be as scarlet, they shall be as white as snow. Though they be red like crimson, they shall be as wool.
Isaiah 1:18 World English Bible

I don't believe in any trinity ideas [Jesus had a goingsforth/orgin in everlasting Micah5:2 but God has no orgin] but I do believe that when God made man and said "let us make man in our image" God was talking to someone other than himself someone who is not God.Someone definitely who has the same image as God because man was created in the image of both of these individuals. It must be that God was talking to His Only begotten Son who is
''...the image of the invisible God...""the express image(ÇαÃÂακÄήàcharaktÄ“r-pprecise repoduction)of HIS person..."
Colosians 1:15;Hebrews 1:3

God is a single individual being

"But to us [there is but] ONE God, the Father...""ONE God and Father of all, who [is] above all, and through all, and in you all."
1st Corin 8:6;Ephesians 4:6

and He has a personal name,Yahweh. In eternity he had an onlybegotten Son and he was very much involved in creation and this is what the Prophets in the Old Testament and the Ancient Israelites believed.

"Who hath ascended up into heaven, or descended? who hath gathered the wind in his fists? who hath bound the waters in a garment? who hath established all the ends of the earth? what [is] HIS name, and what [is] HIS SON'S name, if thou canst tell?"
Proverbs 30:4

I'm sorry that's all the time I have but I wanted to ask you if God changes? And if God's only begotten Son was God's representitive in the new testament isn't it possible that He was also His representative in the Old Testament as well. Surely no man has seen God at any time because he dwelleth behind the light that no man can approach unto in heaven but then we see Moses was talking to Yahweh face to face as a man does a friend. Surely that this was the Angel of God that Yahweh said would have the power to use his name. That's who we see in the burning bush using God's name who Moses was worshiping. Not only says it in exodus 3 but in Acts where Peter tells the story again. Surely this was God's only begotten Son who was the Captain of the Host of Yahweh in Joshua 5:15,16 Joshua was worshiping God's Son I'm Sorry I'm just rambeling on but I really have to go. I wanted to thank you for making this John 17:3 post because the Father is the Only True/original God and there is no trinity but that does not mean that Jesus is a created being. He definitely is not created. and that's the main point I'd like to get accross. Please have a good day
 
Back
Top