Join For His Glory for a discussion on how
https://christianforums.net/threads/a-vessel-of-honor.110278/
https://christianforums.net/threads/psalm-70-1-save-me-o-god-lord-help-me-now.108509/
Read through the following study by Tenchi for more on this topic
https://christianforums.net/threads/without-the-holy-spirit-we-can-do-nothing.109419/
Join Sola Scriptura for a discussion on the subject
https://christianforums.net/threads/anointed-preaching-teaching.109331/#post-1912042
Strengthening families through biblical principles.
Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.
Read daily articles from Focus on the Family in the Marriage and Parenting Resources forum.
In KJV,
sheol/hades is more like a grave - a place for souls after death. gehenna is a place of fire and torment.
- Jonah 2:2 sheol in hebrew is translated as hell - which is clearly wrong.
- Acts 2:27 hades in greek is translated as hell - which is clearly wrong.
- Matt 5:22 gehenna in greek is also translated as hell - (which is correct).
Regarding NKJV, it is much better and more correct than KJV when looked into original texts. I had seen all critiques myself and none is convincing when truly analyzed.
Why should those words not be translated hell?
Are you seriously suggesting that people are saved ONLY by reading the KJV?
There were basically two groups of translators working on the NKJV. One half believed that the perverted 45 Alexandrian manuscripts, from which came the Roman Catholic Bibles and the modern perversions, were better than the manuscripts behind the King James. The other group believed the thousands of manuscripts supporting the King James were better. This is a big problem: No one believed that they held God's words in their hands, only a "better" or "worse" text! The translators believed they had something close, but not an accurate Bible.
Heaven and earth shall pass away: but my words shall not pass away. (Mark 13:31)
It is a sad thing when a Bible translator doesn't even believe he has God's words in his hands. It sounds like they don't believe God kept His promise: Perhaps that is why some of them had no problem working on other perversions, both before and after working on the NKJV. This is so unlike the 54+ Bible men who faithfully translated the King James Bible from preserved manuscripts of God's words. The difference between the King James and the "New" King James is the difference between day and night.
I dont know how you can say that the NKJV is better than the KJV.
Those that say that debating which Bible is God's Word is divisive do not understand what the word division really is according to the King James Bible. It is sad to see that men have changed God's word and have not been diligent in wanting to hear what God wants to say.
"As a Christian I would rather be divided by truth than be united by error"
Well done, you've made a translation of the Bible a co-partner in the work of Salvation. That, BTW, is idolatry.
I believe that faith is required for salvation. By that I mean faith in God, and not faith in men.
I don't believe that the niv has been blessed by God. You can take that for what it is worth, and while you are at it take a look around you, the cup of iniquity is over full and the niv ain't helping a thing.
Also, English is just 1 language in the entire world out of more than 3000+ spoken languages and KJV is just 1 translation out of 200+ translations.
2 Why do you post something that is so utterly fallacious and divisive?
Just a quick glance before I go to bed shows that the NIV has "Messiah" at John 1:41 and 4:25. Not to mention the many times it refers to Jesus as "Christ" or "the Christ," which means "Messiah." The "Holy Ghost" isn't removed, he's referred to as the "Holy Spirit" which is a superior rendering.
Just a quick glance before I go to bed shows that the NIV has "Messiah" at John 1:41 and 4:25. Not to mention the many times it refers to Jesus as "Christ" or "the Christ," which means "Messiah." The "Holy Ghost" isn't removed, he's referred to as the "Holy Spirit" which is a superior rendering.
The difference between a ghost and a spirit is this, a ghost has inhabited a body, and a spirit has not. Jesus gave up the Ghost on the cross at Calvary, that is an important difference in my opinion.
No, surely there is not."Holy Ghost" appears many times in the New Testament: Scan the Bible for requested Words and phrases
"Holy Spirit" only appears 3 times in the Old Testament and 4 times in the New Testament:
Scan the Bible for requested Words and phrases
Surely there is a difference of the terms here.
The difference between a ghost and a spirit is this, a ghost has inhabited a body, and a spirit has not. Jesus gave up the Ghost on the cross at Calvary, that is an important difference in my opinion.
In the KJV, "Holy Ghost" appears 89 times in the NT, "Holy Spirit" 3 times in the OT. In the NIV, "Holy Spirit" appears 91 times in the NT and 3 times in the OT.
So, if I decided to throw all reasoning out the window, I could here argue that the KJV is purposely trying to get rid of references to the Holy Spirit/Holy Ghost.
The more I've looked into it, the more I realize that such claims are fallacious and should be avoided by all except the experts in Greek and Hebrew. There is just too much that goes on in the language at the manuscript level for any regular person to make claims about what a certain word means, never mind what a verse or passage mean.Another thing that is wrong in the NIV is the use of the word "commit". Commit does not always mean "I will" as in making a religious commitment. Commit as used in the Hebrew term means to "roll away", thus the burden of what is being committed is being entrusted to another, thus declaring faith in that "He will do it".
......
So while modern Bibles changed the meaning of God's words to place the emphasis on the Holy Spirit or on the believer when the King James Bible has it on testifying of the Son to His glory, I would go with the King James Bible.
What does this have to do with the topic??As it so often goes in the churches there are those people who fancy themselves to be scholars and teachers, it's too bad that these people don't realize how lost they have become. These people believe that they are knowledgeable and endowed with an understanding of God's Word based on their education, and linguistic skills are so blinded by thre own knowledge that they can't actually see the things of God.
These people are all over the churches, and they are doing harm to those people who are seeking the truth of God. It is very true that these people out there who are professing themselves to be wise have become fools.