I thought it would be wise to apologize to
Rollo Tamasi for my quick response to his statement about not liking John MacArthur. I'm sorry Rollo that I answered so quickly and not really in a loving manner to you, my dear Brother, I'm sorry.
It's been a long time since I went over MacArthur's theology on the Blood of Jesus that he made in the middle 70s. in which he puts more emphasis on the death of his body than the Blood for the forgiveness of our sins. Most solid teachers of the Word of God including myself believe that MacArthur is in error. The problem is, and still exists as far as I know, that he refuses to admit that his statements to a member were wrong. Perhaps pride is in his way.
Dr. John MacArthur is a great Pastor/teacher. I have followed his teachings for years and never found anything that was against the Word of God. This unfortunate error in his theology marks everything that He teaches. Just like how Rollo responded, "Dr. John MacArthur says that the shed blood of Christ on the cross has nothing to do with our salvation.
It is well documented that this is what he continues to preach.
I. for one, wouldn't listen to a word he says." Rollo is right, and his statement about what MacArthur teaches is true. What bothered me was that he said, "I for one, wouldn't listen to a word he says."
When I studied what MacArthur said, I could see that he was trying to seek a balance between Christ's Blood, and the death of His body having an equal function in providing Salvation for the world. I personally believe that the shedding of Christ's Blood, according to the Scriptures is most important.
I still believe that because Dr. MacArthur is a highly educated man in the original languages, history of Israel, and New Testament theology, he may have seen something about the sacrifice that Christ, in His body, went thru, might have seen a sacrificial element in that death. Was his theology on the Blood of Jesus wrong?
Yes, without a doubt. Am I going to throw out all his other teachings and theology?
No. I have, over the years learned very valuable theology from the man. Do I agree with all that he teaches? Certainly not. I do not adhere or teach his theology on, lets say the Pentecostal movement. He believes that "tongues" are not for today, I disagree.
Ok folks, I repent of how quickly, in the flesh, I was, in my response to Rollo Tamasi. And if anyone thought ill of my response to him, I'm sorry. I try to live above the energy of the flesh, and respond being led by the Spirit of God....I love you all, and especially you Rollo in this incident....