Join For His Glory for a discussion on how
https://christianforums.net/threads/a-vessel-of-honor.110278/
https://christianforums.net/threads/psalm-70-1-save-me-o-god-lord-help-me-now.108509/
Read through the following study by Tenchi for more on this topic
https://christianforums.net/threads/without-the-holy-spirit-we-can-do-nothing.109419/
Join Sola Scriptura for a discussion on the subject
https://christianforums.net/threads/anointed-preaching-teaching.109331/#post-1912042
Strengthening families through biblical principles.
Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.
Read daily articles from Focus on the Family in the Marriage and Parenting Resources forum.
Please add some explanation with a quoted verse. Otherwise, I have no idea how the verse answers my question or challenge. Heb 10 :29 does not answer my challenge.Hebrews 10:29 How much more severely do you think a man deserves to be punished who has trampled the Son of God under foot, who has treated as an unholy thing the blood of the covenant that sanctified him, and who has insulted the Spirit of grace?
Again, this doesn't answer my challenge.For Jesus is our payment for our sin. The grace was that Jesus did this in the first place, and if you continue in that sin.......you are insulting that grace.
Just to be clear for some, there are several Greek words for "gift". But in both Rom 6;23 and 11:29, Paul used the exact same word, which is "charisma".Less than perfect.
Because it is HIS life and He is the giver of eternal life, He would have to withdraw it at some point if it were possible.
Making His justice and righteousness less than perfect and a liar.
Rom 6:23~~New American Standard Bible
For the wages of sin is death, but the free gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord.
Rom 11:29~~New American Standard Bible
for the gifts and the calling of God are irrevocable.
That comes with your presupposition that eternal life cannot be lost and that there is no human choice in saying, 'Yes', to the offer of salvation. I recommend to you a read of Norman Geisler's book, Chosen but Free (this only gives a brief sample).Less than perfect.
Because it is HIS life and He is the giver of eternal life, He would have to withdraw it at some point if it were possible.
Making His justice and righteousness less than perfect and a liar.
That comes with your presupposition that eternal life cannot be lost and that there is no human choice in saying, 'Yes', to the offer of salvation. I recommend to you a read of Norman Geisler's book, Chosen but Free (this only gives a brief sample).
What are you meaning to convey by, 'Less than perfect' regarding God's justice?
To gain an Arminian perspective, why don't you read some of the articles on the Society of Evangelical Arminians website?I have read that book.
If God didn't "let" some people believe and He "let" others believe. His Justice would be less than perfect.
If he "caused" some to believe and didn't "cause" others to believe. His justice would be less than perfect......the Calvinist argument.
I haven't really made up my mind yet on if it is the Arminian that is more dangerous with their loss of salvation doctrine or the Calvinist with their "sovereignty" in salvation doctrine.
But I do know that perseverance of the saints and loss of salvation are closely tied. They both are works orientated, one just says you can lose your salvation and the other says you lost the salvation you thought you had. They say the same thing, just different words.
I'm surprised that an Arminian would be teaching at a Baptist Seminary. I've never heard of a Baptist who believed that salvation could be lost. And certainly not all Baptists are reformed.To gain an Arminian perspective, why don't you read some of the articles on the Society of Evangelical Arminians website?
There is an excellent book by an evangelical Arminian who is a professor at one of the Southern Baptist Seminaries, Roger E Olson, Arminian Theology: Myths and Realities (InterVarsity Press 2006) in which he examines some of the areas where Arminians have been misunderstood. For example, you'll learn from his exposition that Arminians believe in Total Depravity and Perseverance of the Saints. Yep, you read me correctly. I found it to be an excellent read and contained an excellent summary of Arminian beliefs.
May you enjoy some good reading.
I said: "I challenge anyone who holds to the view that salvation can be lost to prove that 2 Pet 2:4 is about saved angels who lost their salvation."
To whom are you addressing this post?
Yeah, if one studies these religions enough, and goes far enough to draw the logical conclusion on them. They have more in common than differences.To gain an Arminian perspective, why don't you read some of the articles on the Society of Evangelical Arminians website?
There is an excellent book by an evangelical Arminian who is a professor at one of the Southern Baptist Seminaries, Roger E Olson, Arminian Theology: Myths and Realities (InterVarsity Press 2006) in which he examines some of the areas where Arminians have been misunderstood. For example, you'll learn from his exposition that Arminians believe in Total Depravity and Perseverance of the Saints. Yep, you read me correctly. I found it to be an excellent read and contained an excellent summary of Arminian beliefs.
May you enjoy some good reading.
Eph 2:8 is arguably the most forceful verse in the bible that teaches we are secure in Christ.To anyone who believes salvation can't be lost.
When it comes to judging a professing Christian's salvation, imo, one are walking on really thin ice. They are presuming to know things that God is the only one privy to. Sometimes people themselves are not sure and God is getting them sorted out and we should but out, unless we are absolutely sure God instructs us to speak.God is sovereign creator of the universe, creator of all there is in time and space. We know the God can be reasoned with (Abraham on Sodom) and can also chastise for our presumption to reason (Job.) He also tells us "My ways are not your ways." We know that God can create new covenant at will.
"For as the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my ways higher than your ways, and my thoughts than your thoughts." - Isaiah 55:9
How is it that some of us here can presume to know precisely what God can and cannot do, whom God can save and from whom He can withdraw salvation? Is your presumption of correctness that great that you would question God's sovereignty?
BUT.........ινα introduces a purpose clause. And the indicative mood can't be used in a purpose clause.The participle is a verbal substantive. 'Have' in 'have eternal life' is subjunctive mood, present tense, so it means 'may continue to have' (eternal life). The subjunctive mood is the mood of doubtful assertion. Or, as Dana & Mantey put it, it 'is the mood of mild contingency; the mood of probability. While the indicative [mood] assumes reality, the subjunctive assumes unreality. It is the first step away from that which is actual in the direction of that which is only conceivable, and, therefore, properly leads the list of the potential moods' (Dana & Mantey 1955:170).
Oz
I never said anything about saved angels in the Bible..Where do you find the phrase "saved angels" in the Bible?
So were the fallen angels of Gen 6.Angels are referred to as sons of God.
Yep.Angels who were disobedient were cast down to hell, during the days of Noah.
[Lucifer [Satan] and his angels were also removed from heaven and will end up in the fires of hell.
Actually, saved humans will judge the angels. 1 Cor 6:3People who are found to inherit the kingdom of God, and to be partakers of the Resurrection of the dead, have gained the position of being equal to the angels, as sons of God.
Yep.Peter warns us that even the angels were cast down to hell who were disobedient in the days of Noah.
And none of this is relevant to the issue at hand.For if God did not spare the angels who sinned, but cast them down to hell and delivered them into chains of darkness, to be reserved for judgment; and did not spare the ancient world, but saved Noah, one of eight people, a preacher of righteousness, bringing in the flood on the world of the ungodly; and turning the cities of Sodom and Gomorrah into ashes, condemned them to destruction, making them an example to those who afterward would live ungodly; and delivered righteous Lot, who was oppressed by the filthy conduct of the wicked
(for that righteous man, dwelling among them, tormented his righteous soul from day to day by seeing and hearing their lawless deeds)--
then the Lord knows how to deliver the godly out of temptations and to reserve the unjust under punishment for the day of judgment,
and especially those who walk according to the flesh in the lust of uncleanness and despise authority. 2 Peter 2:4-9
And this has already been thoroughly explained. To "inherit" the kingdom is not the same as to "enter" the kingdom.Compare to -
19 Now the works of the flesh are evident, which are: adultery, fornication, uncleanness, lewdness,
20 idolatry, sorcery, hatred, contentions, jealousies, outbursts of wrath, selfish ambitions, dissensions, heresies,
21 envy, murders, drunkenness, revelries, and the like; of which I tell you beforehand, just as I also told you in time past, that those who practice such things will not inherit the kingdom of God.
...just as I also told you in time past, that those who practice such things will not inherit the kingdom of God.
Paul warns Christians, just as Peter does, that those who practice the lustful cravings of the sinful flesh
Correct. Which has nothing to do with loss of salvation. It is totally about loss of eternal reward and blessings., will not inherit the kingdom.
This is the fallacy of trying to compare apples to oranges.God did not spare the angels, nor will He spare those Christians who trample on the Blood of Jesus and insult the Spirit of Grace and never repent.
Another verse about loss of reward and inheritance IN the kingdom.5 For this you know, that no fornicator, unclean person, nor covetous man, who is an idolater, has any inheritance in the kingdom of Christ and God. 6 Let no one deceive you with empty words, for because of these things the wrath of God comes upon the sons of disobedience.
7 Therefore do not be partakers with them. Ephesians 5:5-7
The key here is unbelieving. Referring to those who never believed. Those who have never believed will certainly be cast into the lake of fire.and again -
But the cowardly, unbelieving, abominable, murderers, sexually immoral, sorcerers, idolaters, and all liars shall have their part in the lake which burns with fire and brimstone, which is the second death." Revelation 21:8JLB
Eph 2:8 is arguably the most forceful verse in the bible that teaches we are secure in Christ.
New American Standard Bible
For by grace you have been saved through faith; and that not of yourselves, it is the gift of God;
This phrase,"have been saved", is Paul grabbing you by your shirt collar, lifting you off the ground and putting his nose right to yours and yelling," YOU HAVE BEEN SAVED AND ARE SAVED!!!"
In the Greek, it is called a periphrastic perfect tense. One of the most forceful ways to express your idea in the Greek. Paul carries over the idea(periphrasis) from the Attic Greek with the use of 2 verbal forms in this one statement because he can't get the whole idea expressed from one verbal form.
~~~~~~
The Expanded Translation reads: “By the grace have you been saved completely with the result that you are in a state of salvation which persists through present time.” Present time in this instance is always the time at which the reader reads his statement. The security of the believer could not have been expressed in stronger terms. (Wuest, Kenneth - The Practical Use of the Greek New Testament - Part II: The Eloquence of Greek Tenses and Moods)