• CFN has a new look and a new theme

    "I bore you on eagle's wings, and brought you to Myself" (Exodus 19:4)

    More new themes will be coming in the future!

  • Desire to be a vessel of honor unto the Lord Jesus Christ?

    Join For His Glory for a discussion on how

    https://christianforums.net/threads/a-vessel-of-honor.110278/

  • CFN welcomes new contributing members!

    Please welcome Roberto and Julia to our family

    Blessings in Christ, and hope you stay awhile!

  • Have questions about the Christian faith?

    Come ask us what's on your mind in Questions and Answers

    https://christianforums.net/forums/questions-and-answers/

  • Read the Gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ?

    Read through this brief blog, and receive eternal salvation as the free gift of God

    /blog/the-gospel

  • Taking the time to pray? Christ is the answer in times of need

    https://christianforums.net/threads/psalm-70-1-save-me-o-god-lord-help-me-now.108509/

  • Focus on the Family

    Strengthening families through biblical principles.

    Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.

[_ Old Earth _] Why Evolution is True

Don't bother. It's another "Yayayayayayayayah, I can't hear you" denial of science.

Entirely hand-waving.
 
The Barbarian said:
Don't bother. It's another "Yayayayayayayayah, I can't hear you" denial of science.

Entirely hand-waving.

from the bit i read it was in support of evolution :shrug
 
John said:
The Barbarian said:
Don't bother. It's another "Yayayayayayayayah, I can't hear you" denial of science.

Entirely hand-waving.

from the bit i read it was in support of evolution :shrug

Read closer...it is not in support of Evolution. It is a critique of a book that supports evolution. I think both sides of the issue present good arguements and points to consider.
 
Read closer...it is not in support of Evolution. It is a critique of a book that supports evolution. I think both sides of the issue present good arguements and points to consider.

Sorry, i jumped to conclusions. :oops
 
I think both sides of the issue present good arguements and points to consider.

Which points did you find most compelling against science?
 
Barbarian said:
Which points did you find most compelling against science?

There are no points against science ---- only against evolution.
 
The Barbarian said:
I think both sides of the issue present good arguements and points to consider.

Which points did you find most compelling against science?

I find the debate interesting. I don't see it being against science either as Paidon already commented on. I don't want to get into a tit for tat. Personally, I have not made up my mind as to which is true, Evolution or Intelligent Design or if the two can coexist. However, I do find the debate fascinating and how vehement both sides can become.
 
So, if you don't know what's right or wrong, how can you have an opinion?
 
Paidion said:
Barbarian said:
Which points did you find most compelling against science?

There are no points against science ---- only against evolution.

Excellent point. I love Science, good science. It's Evolutionary Theory that I can't swallow, because I believe the Science of Biogenesis, it's Evolutionists that have the problem with the laws of science.

In Jesus,

BAC
 
Excellent point. I love Science, good science. It's Evolutionary Theory that I can't swallow, because I believe the Science of Biogenesis, it's Evolutionists that have the problem with the laws of science.

Odd then, that scientists are overwhelmingly evolutionists, and the same people who object to science also object to evolution. Creationists, for example, object to thermodynamics, physics, geology, astronomy, and a host of other sciences.

Which "laws of science" do you think conflict with evolution? And there doesn't seem to be a science of "biogenesis." The closest thing I can think of is abiogenesis.
 
The Barbarian said:
So, if you don't know what's right or wrong, how can you have an opinion?

Not sure I understand your question. Opinion is not black and white. I can have an opinion but have it not rest on one side of the issue or the other or to even straddle both sides. I will admit that I lean towards evolution but at the same time think it is possible that God used evolution as part of his creation. I think Intelligent Design is possible and more than likely probable.
 
Not sure I understand your question.

If you don't know the details, how can you know who (if anyone) is right?

I will admit that I lean towards evolution but at the same time think it is possible that God used evolution as part of his creation.

Most of us do.

I think Intelligent Design is possible and more than likely probable.

One or the other. But I think creation is much more likely than ID. Since there's no sign of design in nature, that's pretty much ruled out.

The last word from the IDers (Phillip Johnson, who invented ID) is that they think it might be a "space alien."

I don't think so.
 
The Barbarian said:
Not sure I understand your question.

If you don't know the details, how can you know who (if anyone) is right?

[quote:3p6dqe8s]I will admit that I lean towards evolution but at the same time think it is possible that God used evolution as part of his creation.

Most of us do.

I think Intelligent Design is possible and more than likely probable.

One or the other. But I think creation is much more likely than ID. Since there's no sign of design in nature, that's pretty much ruled out.

The last word from the IDers (Phillip Johnson, who invented ID) is that they think it might be a "space alien."

I don't think so.[/quote:3p6dqe8s]

I would contend that you are incorrect is stating there is no design in nature. I would like to ask you to expand on that statement. How can you not look at the world and the life in it and not see a design of some sort?
 
I would contend that you are incorrect is stating there is no design in nature.

So far, whenever we find out how something natural came to be, it was by natural processes. God does most everything that way in this world. And recently, it's become clear that evolutionary processes are more efficient than design. Just what we'd expect of God.

How can you not look at the world and the life in it and not see a design of some sort?

So far, I can't find anything that shows design. Creation, yes. Design, no. God, yes. "Space aliens", no.
 
Crying Rock said:
But I think creation is much more likely than ID.

Didn't you write earlier that you are not a creationist? But then you claim you are a Christian?

I can do some research to direct you to some local therapists.

Are you open to that?

:help
 
Creationism and creation are two different, often contradictory things. Can you show me an example of nature that was "designed" instead of created by natural processes?
 
Back
Top