Christian Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • Are you receiving an "error" mesage when posting?

    Chances are it went through, so check before douible posting.

    We hope to have the situtaion resolved soon, and Happy Thanksgiving to those in the US!

  • Desire to be a vessel of honor unto the Lord Jesus Christ?

    Join For His Glory for a discussion on how

    https://christianforums.net/threads/a-vessel-of-honor.110278/

  • Taking the time to pray? Christ is the answer in times of need

    https://christianforums.net/threads/psalm-70-1-save-me-o-god-lord-help-me-now.108509/

  • Ever read the Gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ?

    Read through this brief blog, and receive eternal salvation as the free gift of God

    /blog/the-gospel

  • Have questions about the Christian faith?

    Come ask us what's on your mind in Questions and Answers

    https://christianforums.net/forums/questions-and-answers/

  • How are famous preachers sometimes effected by sin?

    Join Sola Scriptura for a discussion on the subject

    https://christianforums.net/threads/anointed-preaching-teaching.109331/#post-1912042

  • Focus on the Family

    Strengthening families through biblical principles.

    Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.

Why Is The TN Christian School Shooter's Manifesto Being Kept Secret By FBI ?

Why still no release of a crazed mass school shooter's own words for killing children .
What are they afraid of ?
I just looked. It's due to court back log. The manifesto was submitted for release pending a Judge's approval, since the trial is still underway. That hearing is on June 8th. So 5 days until a judge yay or nays the public dispersal.
 
In the many years that I frequented Malls as a teen during the 70's guns were much easier to purchase.
Write that down.
But there wasn't a significant proportion of the population infatuated with violence against minorities and "liberals."

DALLAS — The gunman who killed at least eight people and wounded a half-dozen more at a Dallas-area outlet mall was a 33-year-old suspected neo-Nazi sympathizer, two senior law enforcement officials said Sunday.
Allen police on Sunday identified the shooter as Mauricio Garcia. Garcia was killed Saturday by a police officer who happened to be at Allen Premium Outlets, about 25 miles north of Dallas, police said.
The gunman, who lived in Dallas, was armed with an "AR-15 style assault weapon," President Joe Biden said.
He was wearing a tactical vest and also had a handgun, one of the senior law enforcement officials said.
More weapons and ammunition were found in his car, the source said. At the time of the massacre, he was wearing a patch on his chest that included the acronym "rwds," according to two senior law enforcement officials. Authorities believe the letters stand for "right wing death squad," a phrase used in far-right online spaces, one of the senior law enforcement officials added.

A preliminary review of what is believed to be the shooter’s social media accounts reveal hundreds of posts that include racially or ethnically motivated violent extremist rhetoric, including neo-Nazi material and material espousing white supremacy, two senior law enforcement officials said.


A whacked-out neo-Nazi racist. Pretty much the norm for this kind of thing.
 
But there wasn't a significant proportion of the population infatuated with violence against minorities and "liberals."
So with nearly 10,000 blacks murdered in 2020, over 98% of whom were murdered by other blacks I take it you are upset that there is a large number of black neo-Nazis living in America's cities, doing the dirty work of the white liberal racist powers who organize and oversee these inner city slaughter pens they govern ?


FBI DATA SHOWS LARGE INCREASE IN MURDERS IN 2020 NATIONWIDE

In 2019, at least 7,484 Black Americans were murdered. That number shot up to at least 9,941 murders in 2020, meaning there was an increase of 2,457 Black Americans murdered over the previous year.

The number of Black murders was also far higher than White murders in 2020. The FBI data shows there 7,043 White people murdered that year, meaning 2,898 more Black people were killed compared to Whites.

Between 2010 and 2019, there was an average of 5,954 White murders, which is roughly 16% lower than the 10-year average of Black murders. During that same time period, an average of 6,927 Black Americans were murdered each year, meaning Black murders shot up by 43% in 2020 compared to the previous 10-year average.

The figures are more staggering considering White Americans make up 76% of the population compared to Black Americans representing only 13%, according to Census data.
 
So with nearly 10,000 blacks murdered in 2020, over 98% of whom were murdered by other blacks
But it's not what you were led to believe. Looks like it's roughly 60-70% of murdered people are murdered by people of their own race. Nowhere close to 90%

I take it you are upset that there is a large number of black neo-Nazis living in America's cities, doing the dirty work of the white liberal racist powers who organize and oversee these inner city slaughter pens they govern ?

As you learned, Neo-Nazis generally are white, mostly Anglo or Hispanic.

In Chicago in 2021, the homicide (not just murder) rate was 29.5 per 100,000 residents.
To give you some comparison, Birmingham, Alabama has a homicide rate of over 50.6

Red State Effect:
In 2020, nine of ten states with the highest per capita violent crime rates leaned Republican, while eight of ten states with the lowest rates leaned Democrat, according to a cross-analysis of the latest available FBI crime data with FiveThirtyEight's partisan lean index.

Looking at the murder rate specifically, states that voted for Donald Trump exceeded states that voted for Joe Biden in every year since 2000, according to an analysis of CDC mortality data by Third Way.


Given the numbers, it appears that cultural factors are more important that race in affecting violent crime rates.
 
But it's not what you were led to believe. Looks like it's roughly 60-70% of murdered people are murdered by people of their own race. Nowhere close to 90%

How likely is a person of a given race to attack someone of a different race? The 2018 NCVS found approximately 608,000 crimes of interracial violence involving blacks and whites. Of this number, blacks were the aggressor in 90 percent of cases, and whites in just 10 percent. The NCVS gives the percentages.

Anyone who thinks that blacks who were found to be the aggressor in 90% of interracial crimes, according to your source , were then only responsible for roughly 60-70% of black on black crimes has puddin for brains.


According to the FBI’s uniform crime-reporting data for 2016, 90.1 percent of black victims of homicide were killed by other blacks

That is FBI'S 2016 black on black homicide percent rate of 90.1 for 2016.

Anyone knows that the FBI's 2016 black on black murder rate has only ballooned since 2020.
Nowhere near your lowball " 60-70%" .
My 98% percent being much closer.
You sound just like one of the liberal white-privilege racist overseers who govern any one of America's inner city black slaughter pens, where the majority of these black murders take place, sweeping the expendable black murder victims under the rug with smile and a lowball number, and a "nothing to see here ! "
 
How likely is a person of a given race to attack someone of a different race? The 2018 NCVS found approximately 608,000 crimes of interracial violence involving blacks and whites. Of this number, blacks were the aggressor in 90 percent of cases, and whites in just 10 percent. The NCVS gives the percentages.

Rates of white-on-white and Black-on-Black homicide are similar, at around 80% and 90%

Overall, most homicides in the United States are intraracial, and the rates of white-on-white and Black-on-Black killings are similar, both long term and in individual years.

Between 1980-2008, the U.S. Department of Justice found that 84% of white victims were killed by white offenders and 93% of Black victims were killed by Black offenders.

In 2018, the Federal Bureau of Investigation reported that 81% of white victims were killed by white offenders, and 89% of Black victims were killed by Black offenders.

In 2017, the FBI reported almost identical figures — 80% of white victims were killed by white offenders, and 88% of Black victims were killed by Black offenders.

Though the numbers differ year-to-year, the stark difference that the viral post attempts to portray between the rates of white-on-white and Black-on-Black homicide — which it puts at 16% and 97%, respectively — is inaccurate.

Both numbers tend to hover between 80% and 90% and remain within 10 percentage points of each other.
Likewise, the post attempts to portray a gulf in the rate of Black-on-white and white-on-Black homicide — which it lists at 81% and 2%, respectively.

Statistics from the FBI in 2018 and 2017 contradict that claim.

In 2018, 16% of white victims were killed by Black offenders, while 8% of Black victims were killed by white offenders.

Similarly, in 2017, 16% of white victims were killed by Black offenders, while 9% of Black victims were killed by white offenders.

But there's a problem here. Suppose that there are white killers and black killers who aren't prejudiced, and kill randomly, without regard for race. Would we then see the same percentage of whites killing blacks as blacks killing whites? No, we wouldn't. Blacks are about 15% of the American population. Whites are about 73%. So if everyone was killing people randomly without regard to race, they'd be killing about 3 times as many whites as whites killing blacks. And yet the ratio is only 2 times as many. It doesn't have to be about racism; could be that red states are more violent than blue states (they are: https://gigafact.org/fact-briefs/do-red-states-rank-higher-in-violent-crime-rates-than-blue-states), and black people are more often targeted there. Or it could be any number of things. But it's very clear that white-on-black violence is more frequent, relative to black-on-white violence than mere chance would predict.
 

Rates of white-on-white and Black-on-Black homicide are similar, at around 80% and 90%


You just proved by your original claim of " 60 -70 % : you a liar then.
Ant still lying.
black on black homicide is not "around" it is well over 90%

But it's not what you were led to believe. Looks like it's roughly 60-70% of murdered people are murdered by people of their own race. Nowhere close to 90%
You still sound just like one of the liberal white-privilege racist overseers who govern any one of America's democrat inner city black slaughter pens, where the majority of these black murders take place, sweeping the expendable black murder victims under the rug with smile and a lowball lie of number, and a "nothing to see here ! "
 
You just proved by your original claim of " 60 -70 % : you a liar then.
Ant still lying.
black on black homicide is not "around" it is well over 90%
You're confusing murder with homicide. Go back and look. Be careful about being too quick to call people liars. It reflects badly on your character.

You still sound just like one of the liberal white-privilege racist overseers
It isn't just liberals who depend on real data. Many conservatives do it too. Racists, not so much. "Conservative" is not necessarily "racist."

any one of America's democrat inner city black slaughter pens
Well, that's an interesting belief, one that a lot of racists hold. Even some non-racists think so. But here's a way to put it all in perspective:

The fact is, that's not a good reason to live a long way away from where you work, because a long commute is more dangerous than living in a dangerous neighborhood.

It's one of those odd quirks of the way people's brains work that people don't recognize this immediately. People drive all the time, so driving seems safe. Violent crime, on the other hand, is rare, making it seem like a bigger danger than it is. A quick check of the statistics, though, tells the story.

The most dangerous neighborhood I could find in a quick search on the internet was census tract 440100 in south-central Chicago. According to the Chicago police department, there have been 225 violent crimes, including 5 murders, this year in this neighborhood, which has a population of 9324.

So, that's 5 murders per 9324 people per 365 days which comes to 0.00000147 murders per person per day.


According to the Bureau of Transportation Statistics, there are 100 injuries, including 1.5 deaths per 100 million vehicle miles, which works out to 0.000000015 traffic fatalities per mile driven.

That's all the information we need to find the commute that's as dangerous as living in the most dangerous neighborhood in Chicago: 49 miles (a 98 mile round trip).

Granted that's a long commute. On the other hand, that assumes that there's a zero percent chance of being murdered in whatever neighborhood you do live in, which is at least a little optimistic.


"Slaughter pens" that are safer than driving your car. Think about it.
 
"Slaughter pens" that are safer than driving your car. Think about it.
So the current surging slaughter of urban blacks males would be much worse if they live outside the liberal white privilege controlled urban ghetto plantations, and drove back & forth each day to the inner city ghetto plantations,


May 10 (Reuters) - The rate of U.S. gun deaths surged 35% in 2020 to the highest point since 1994, with especially deadly levels for young Black men, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention said in a report published on Tuesday.
African Americans as a whole were at least four times more likely to be killed by a gun than the overall population, and 12 times more likely than a white person, the data showed.


If only the families knew how fortunate they were as they buried them.
The percent of blacks murdered would most likely be much lower if the non-black African Americans were discounted from the total number.
I'll give you that.

Joe Biden's 'you ain't black' comment is voter intimidation - USA Today

 
You seem entirely obsessed by race. I've shown you that your imagination has badly misled you about crime and race. Try to find a way to calm yourself and look at things rationally.
So the current surging slaughter of urban blacks males
The most dangerous neighborhood I could find in a quick search on the internet was census tract 440100 in south-central Chicago. According to the Chicago police department, there have been 225 violent crimes, including 5 murders, this year in this neighborhood, which has a population of 9324.

So, that's 5 murders per 9324 people per 365 days which comes to 0.00000147 murders per person per day.

According to the Bureau of Transportation Statistics, there are 100 injuries, including 1.5 deaths per 100 million vehicle miles, which works out to 0.000000015 traffic fatalities per mile driven.
That's all the information we need to find the commute that's as dangerous as living in the most dangerous neighborhood in Chicago: 49 miles (a 98 mile round trip).

When commuting is as dangerous than living in the most dangerous neighborhood in Chicago, it's pretty clear that you've completely lost your perspective.
 
You seem entirely obsessed by race. I've shown you that your imagination has badly misled you about crime and race. Try to find a way to calm yourself and look at things rationally.
Still, I believe that if the non-black African Americans were discarded using your racist, ultra liberal, white privilege method the numbers would look much better.
Elon Musk? Berbers? Arabs of African descent? Those guys generally are less violent than red state whites.

You got that completely backwards. You obsession with race keeps you from thinking clearly about this.
 
You seem entirely obsessed by race. I've shown you that your imagination has badly misled you about crime and race. Try to find a way to calm yourself and look at things rationally.
The ultra- liberal white privilege racist president of our nation is clearly highly concerned about the threat posed to children and ourselves from the frightening jungle inhabitants who do not look the way you or him do.

"Unless we do something about this, my children are going to grow up in a jungle, the jungle being a racial jungle" ( President Biden )
 
You seem entirely obsessed by race. I've shown you that your imagination has badly misled you about crime and race. Try to find a way to calm yourself and look at things rationally.

The ultra- liberal white privilege racist president of our nation is clearly highly concerned about the threat posed to children and ourselves from the frightening jungle inhabitants who do not look the way you or him do.
That would be kind of odd, since Biden was speaking about his opposition to busing and his desire to integrate housing for all races. He correctly pointed out that busing would not solve the problem but that open housing would. And it is.

"Unless we do something about this, my children are going to grow up in a jungle, the jungle being a racial jungle" ( President Biden )
The post was flagged as part of Facebook’s efforts to combat false news and misinformation on its News Feed. (Read more about our partnership with Facebook.)

The quote is close to something Biden said, but the Facebook post is missing context..

First, he wasn’t speaking broadly about integrating Black and white Americans. He was talking about busing to integrate public schools. The post on the pro-Trump site cites a July 2019 tweet from New York Times reporter Sheryl Gay Stolberg, who said that a University of Southern California law professor had spotted this quote from Biden:

"Unless we do something about this, my children are going to grow up in a jungle, the jungle being a racial jungle with tensions built so high that it is going to explode at some point. We have got to make some move on this."

Stolberg put that comment in context, tweeting that Biden "warns that unless there is ‘orderly integration’ (he favored housing, not busing), ‘My children are going to grow up in a jungle, the jungle being a racial jungle.’" She linked to a story she wrote with her colleague Astead Herndon titled: "How Joe Biden became the Democrats’ anti-busing crusader.
...
Biden went on to reference a "racial jungle" and then said that "pushing busing in a way in which it goes beyond the constitutional mandates is like throwing a rock through the civil rights window. I think it has repercussions that are extensive in terms of the ultimate objective of seeing that we get integrated neighborhoods, of seeing that we eventually eliminate job discrimination, of seeing that we change housing patterns, of seeing alteration of tax structure."


See how easily they fooled you? Here's a hint: When someone tells you something you really, really want to be true, that's when you need to be the most skeptical. Because that's when you are most easily fooled. Saves me a lot of embarrassment. Try it.
 
And Biden sometimes angers liberals by more than just opposing busing. Would you like to learn about some other ways that he differs with liberals?
 
And Biden sometimes angers liberals by more than just opposing busing. Would you like to learn about some other ways that he differs with liberals?
President Biden is working tirelessly to bring equity into this nation's, "racial jungle" ( Biden), by ensuring that only the poor kids who are, " just as Bright as white kids ", ( President Biden) are eligible.
And he is to be commended for that.

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/08/09/us/politics/joe-biden-poor-kids.html

Joe Biden Says 'Poor Kids' Are Just as Bright as 'White Kids'​

 
You seem rather angry at Biden for opposing busing. But I showed you that he was right; integrating neighborhoods worked much better than busing, which failed as he predicted.
 
You seem rather angry at Biden for opposing busing. But I showed you that he was right; integrating neighborhoods worked much better than busing, which failed as he predicted.
Being on Buses all mixed together the key to President Biden's plan was to make sure that only:
" African Americans who are clean & articulate & good looking..." ( President Biden)
were allowed on the buses.

Finding the ones that talk white and bath regularly not an easy thing to do as President Biden has attested to.
But he worked so hard to weed out the poor speaking unsanitary ones and make his plan very storybook in the end, of course.
 
Finding the ones that talk white and bath regularly not an easy thing to do
It's not just poor whites who have bad hygiene. You can find blacks like that, too.

But most of them are pretty much like the rest of us. Biden's concern was that busing would make everyone upset and do nothing to integrate society. Which is why he favored desegregating neighborhoods.

And that worked. If you were less obsessed with race, you'd probably be able to figure out why.
 
Back
Top