dianegcook
Member
Thanks Deborah for that site, I enjoyed it!Both Adam Clarke and John Gill wrote that verses 18 and 19 should be in ( ) and were not written by Peter but by Luke the historian.
Gill's evidence is pretty compelling.
."This verse, with the following, seem to be the words of Luke the historian, which should be read in a parenthesis; for there was no need to have acquainted the disciples with the manner of Judas's death, which was so well known to all the inhabitants of Jerusalem; nor would Jerusalem, and the inhabitants of it, be mentioned with that propriety by Peter, when he, and those he spoke of, were upon the spot; nor could there be any necessity of his explaining a word in their own tongue, which they understood, and that in a language unknown unto them; nor does it seem likely, that in so short a time as five or six weeks, the field should have obtained the name of "Aceldama", and be commonly known by it."
Clarke
"It is very likely that the 18th and 19th verses are not the words of Peter, but of the historian, St. Luke, and should be read in a parenthesis, and then the 17th and 20th verses will make a connected sense. On the case of Judas, and the manner of his death, see the observations at the end of this chapter."
At the end of the chapter he listed all the theories, etc. about how Judas died. Too much to post here but this is a link to it. http://biblehub.com/commentaries/clarke/acts/1.htm
There are various opinions on this matter.
That is why I refuse to condemn.
In Matt.27:6 states that the chief priests took the money, (which they could not put up in the treasury, because it was the price of blood).
Verse 7, then they took counsel and they bought the field. Potters field, broken pots, lives broken.
Zech.11:12-17
13, The Lord said, Cast it unto the potter, a goodly price, and took the 30 pieces of silver, and cast them to the potter in the house of the Lord.
14, Then I cut asunder mine other staff, even Bands, That I might break the brotherhood between Judah and Israel.