J
jculp123180
Guest
Re: Wine
I think you're being intentionally obtuse but regardless, they were accusing the apostles of being drunk and they knew it was morning. Peter said this because it took most of the day to get drunk with the low alcohol content in wine.
Nobody's calling Jesus a drunk. There's a difference between getting drunk and being a drunk and God's word says don't be drunk, no indefinite article (that would be "a drunk")
In response to this quote from you:
my experience is probably more representative than yours, but this isn't really a debate.
Society doesn't go to hell, people who do not accept Christ go to hell. If you want to start calling me names like pharisee, go ahead, it says more about your argument than it does mine. God's word still says don't get drunk, you have yet to tell me how I am fighting things that are right.
So you're telling me that the principle he was teaching was only about religious behavior? This is getting hilarious. Stop rationalizing and realize that there's a problem in this country with the misuse of alcohol and that Christians should be distancing themselves from it.
Yes, but you're saying that "All anti-drinking Christians do is teach non-Christians that Christians are hypocrites. " like I'm somehow supposed to say that there's nothing wrong with it just so that the world won't think that those who do a wrong thing are hypocrites. That's hypocritical if anything is. Just because some Christians drink doesn't make it right. The same goes for overeating and the other things you listed, Christians to those things but that does not make them right. You keep asserting that "Some Christians drink and the Bible teaches that drinking is okay" but refuse to acknowledge the Bible's instruction to not be drunk with wine.
Poke said:People don't usually drink heavily in the morning. It's not that in the morning, wine miraculously has a lower alcohol content, or whatever it is that you're suggesting.
I think you're being intentionally obtuse but regardless, they were accusing the apostles of being drunk and they knew it was morning. Peter said this because it took most of the day to get drunk with the low alcohol content in wine.
If you met Jesus, you'd call him a drunk. Not me. The pharisees called Jesus a drunk. You and the pharisees refuse to recognize that wine is a gift from God that a person can enjoy without being a drunk.
Nobody's calling Jesus a drunk. There's a difference between getting drunk and being a drunk and God's word says don't be drunk, no indefinite article (that would be "a drunk")
Yeah, like your daily experience is representative of society as a whole.
In response to this quote from you:
Drinking to get drunk is mostly limited to teens and college-age drinkers. And, even that is a result of living in an anti-drinking culture. They weren't taught to drink with discipline and they see drinking as a form of rebellion and liberation.
my experience is probably more representative than yours, but this isn't really a debate.
You are helping send society to Hell by fighting things that are right, at the expense of fighting things that are wrong. Zionist are the modern day pharisees.
Society doesn't go to hell, people who do not accept Christ go to hell. If you want to start calling me names like pharisee, go ahead, it says more about your argument than it does mine. God's word still says don't get drunk, you have yet to tell me how I am fighting things that are right.
Paul was talking about religious matters when he was talking about meat sacrificed to idols. But, neither Paul or Jesus avoided drinking out of rationalization that they'd cause people to stumble. That would be the pharisees.
So you're telling me that the principle he was teaching was only about religious behavior? This is getting hilarious. Stop rationalizing and realize that there's a problem in this country with the misuse of alcohol and that Christians should be distancing themselves from it.
You're the one who brought up the issue of respect. I'm only pointing out that you are not teaching people to respect Christians. You're only teaching people that Christians are hypocrites. That's not a smokescreen but a direct rebuttal to your argument.
Yes, but you're saying that "All anti-drinking Christians do is teach non-Christians that Christians are hypocrites. " like I'm somehow supposed to say that there's nothing wrong with it just so that the world won't think that those who do a wrong thing are hypocrites. That's hypocritical if anything is. Just because some Christians drink doesn't make it right. The same goes for overeating and the other things you listed, Christians to those things but that does not make them right. You keep asserting that "Some Christians drink and the Bible teaches that drinking is okay" but refuse to acknowledge the Bible's instruction to not be drunk with wine.