smaller
Member
- Oct 23, 2003
- 12,380
- 664
As believers we all too often fall into one sided fairy tale happy happy notions about what God in Christ is doing or will do. I could give many examples, but some of my favorite pseudo faith delusions are freewill claims that IF we all only decided to do good, then the world would be only good. OR, from the determinist side of the ledgers of delusions, that no matter what good or evil is decided upon, God in Christ just arbitrarily and capriciously decides who gets into heaven and who doesn't, without recourse of any kind, similar to a Divine lottery system.
For the purposes of this particular Bible study, I'll examine what God in Christ, by His Word and Spirit, is really up to. We might see that it is not all roses, bowls of cherries, colorful jellybeans and rainbows.
In the first two engagements of Gods Words with man, Adam in the Garden of Eden, we are treated to two opposite formats. The first format of engagement was blessings:
Genesis 1:28
And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth.
When we put on our rosy colored glasses above, we only see blessings, right? But, if we pay closer attentions, we might also see in the above the need to "subdue," have "dominion over" and the need to "replenish." Our happy happy mindset is always drawn to the nice stuff or the stuff we like to hear, but let's look at the potential for adversarial engagements in that same scripture:
Genesis 1:28
And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth.
The need to "replenish" suggests that depletion is a reality does it not?
The need to "subdue" suggests that resistance is a reality does it not?
The need to "have dominion" suggests that adversity is a reality, does it not?
In the second course of engagement with Gods Words, God delivers the very first law. The essence of all law is command(s) coupled with penalty(s) for failure(s). And in that first law we have both of these law components, of command and penalty:
Gen. 2:
16 And the Lord God commanded the man, saying, Of every tree of the garden thou mayest freely eat:
17 But of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it: for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die.
Law, particularly the first one, has perplexed man from day 1. There is just a whole lot of Divine Punch in that first law. We are not really told whether or not Adam had even eaten yet prior to the delivery of that first law. And did Adam really have a clue about what death was? Unlikely.
Bible study today is fortunately in retrospect. We have a lot more information to dissect and understand "protology," the study of beginnings, than what Adam/Eve had. For purposes in this thread I'll be examining the dynamic of THE LAW and it's adverse, agitating intentions. Readers might have to take off their rosy colored blessings only glasses for this study. A lot of phony christian religious stories will be stepped on:
1 Timothy 1:9
Knowing this, that the law is not made for a righteous man, but for the lawless and disobedient, for the ungodly and for sinners, for unholy and profane, for murderers of fathers and murderers of mothers, for manslayers,
We can certainly see that Adam was delivered a LAW, a COMMAND. Do we see Adam in the light of 1 Tim. 1:9? Probably not. Paul tells us quite clearly that the law is for the above. What does that tell us about Adam?
For the purposes of this particular Bible study, I'll examine what God in Christ, by His Word and Spirit, is really up to. We might see that it is not all roses, bowls of cherries, colorful jellybeans and rainbows.
In the first two engagements of Gods Words with man, Adam in the Garden of Eden, we are treated to two opposite formats. The first format of engagement was blessings:
Genesis 1:28
And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth.
When we put on our rosy colored glasses above, we only see blessings, right? But, if we pay closer attentions, we might also see in the above the need to "subdue," have "dominion over" and the need to "replenish." Our happy happy mindset is always drawn to the nice stuff or the stuff we like to hear, but let's look at the potential for adversarial engagements in that same scripture:
Genesis 1:28
And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth.
The need to "replenish" suggests that depletion is a reality does it not?
The need to "subdue" suggests that resistance is a reality does it not?
The need to "have dominion" suggests that adversity is a reality, does it not?
In the second course of engagement with Gods Words, God delivers the very first law. The essence of all law is command(s) coupled with penalty(s) for failure(s). And in that first law we have both of these law components, of command and penalty:
Gen. 2:
16 And the Lord God commanded the man, saying, Of every tree of the garden thou mayest freely eat:
17 But of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it: for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die.
Law, particularly the first one, has perplexed man from day 1. There is just a whole lot of Divine Punch in that first law. We are not really told whether or not Adam had even eaten yet prior to the delivery of that first law. And did Adam really have a clue about what death was? Unlikely.
Bible study today is fortunately in retrospect. We have a lot more information to dissect and understand "protology," the study of beginnings, than what Adam/Eve had. For purposes in this thread I'll be examining the dynamic of THE LAW and it's adverse, agitating intentions. Readers might have to take off their rosy colored blessings only glasses for this study. A lot of phony christian religious stories will be stepped on:
1 Timothy 1:9
Knowing this, that the law is not made for a righteous man, but for the lawless and disobedient, for the ungodly and for sinners, for unholy and profane, for murderers of fathers and murderers of mothers, for manslayers,
We can certainly see that Adam was delivered a LAW, a COMMAND. Do we see Adam in the light of 1 Tim. 1:9? Probably not. Paul tells us quite clearly that the law is for the above. What does that tell us about Adam?