atpollard
Member
Sure thing.Let's please leave this for tomorrow.
Night.
Strengthening families through biblical principles.
Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.
Read daily articles from Focus on the Family in the Marriage and Parenting Resources forum.
Sure thing.Let's please leave this for tomorrow.
The teaching of Romans 2 is very solid.Are you able as God's servant to show me that Romans 2:14-16 does not talk about people who don't have the revelation of the gospel in the law and how they will be condemned or acquitted on the basis of the revelation of God they have received through nature and conscience alone?
A ludicrous suggestion reformed theology is all about the cross.In fact, in the reformed soteriological paradigm, we find it difficult to understand WHY the cross was necessary at all.
Then, you mean, men DO have an excuse?!The teaching of Romans 2 is very solid.
It is not however given as a teaching of a possible works salvation.
Nature and conscience allow men to have an incomplete knowledge , but not a saving knowledge.
That is easily proven ,even by Romans 10.9-17
Because you say so, does not make it so.A ludicrous suggestion reformed theology is all about the cross.
W...Romans 1 comes before romans 2;Then, you mean, men DO have an excuse?!
Why are they without excuse?W...Romans 1 comes before romans 2;
16 For I am not ashamed of the gospel of Christ: for it is the power of God unto salvation to every one that believeth; to the Jew first, and also to the Greek.
17 For therein is the righteousness of God revealed from faith to faith: as it is written, The just shall live by faith.
18 For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who hold the truth in unrighteousness;
19 Because that which may be known of God is manifest in them; for God hath shewed it unto them.
20 For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse:
This is clearly declared. When we go a few verses further it does not change
Even the enemies of reformed brothers would not make this suggestion.Because you say so, does not make it so.
To be cont'd...but not with you.
You don't seem to take this discussion very seriously.
Can't do this now.Even the enemies of reformed brothers would not make this suggestion.
W....what I take serious are bible based interactions. You just saying taint so...is that really thinking that is serious?
You do not have to respond directly to me, I understand. I reserve the right to respond and expose caricatures.
I am not trying to hurt you or anyone else. I react to what is posted.
I'm not saying that Romans 2:14-16 says men are saved by works.The teaching of Romans 2 is very solid.
It is not however given as a teaching of a possible works salvation.
The passage says these men who only have the testimony of God in nature and conscience are either condemned or acquitted on the Day of Christ "their consciences also bearing witness, and their thoughts either accusing or defending them on the day when God will judge men’s secrets through Christ Jesus" (Romans 2:15-16 BSB). So it most certainly is a knowledge of God upon which a person can either have faith, or not have faith, and be fairly judged on the Day of Christ. The passage says so.Nature and conscience allow men to have an incomplete knowledge , but not a saving knowledge.
That is easily proven ,even by Romans 10.9-17
I prefer 'enemies of reformed doctrine'.enemies of reformed brothers
With SOME posters that line of distinction is finer than with others (applies to some Reformed posters as well).I prefer 'enemies of reformed doctrine'.
You’re a Calvinist.
... and that is why we claim "You don't understand."… all the while claiming “you don’t understand”.
For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life.
John 3:16
In their “mind”, they systematically redefine the term “the world” to mean “the elect”.
One of my favorite verses Coop! Joshua really put it on the line didn't he? There are many gods the Bible states but like Johsua I too have chosen to serve Jehovah.And if it seem evil unto you to serve the LORD, choose you this day whom ye will serve; whether the gods which your fathers served that were on the other side of the flood, or the gods of the Amorites, in whose land ye dwell: but as for me and my house, we will serve the LORD.
(Joshua 24:15)
I call heaven and earth to record this day against you, that I have set before you life and death, blessing and cursing: therefore choose life, that both thou and thy seed may live:
(Deuteronomy 30:19)
No man can serve two masters: for either he will hate the one, and love the other; or else he will hold to the one, and despise the other. Ye cannot serve God and mammon.
(Matthew 6:24)
.
And if it seem evil unto you to serve the LORD, choose you this day whom ye will serve; whether the gods which your fathers served that were on the other side of the flood, or the gods of the Amorites, in whose land ye dwell: but as for me and my house, we will serve the LORD.
(Joshua 24:15)
I call heaven and earth to record this day against you, that I have set before you life and death, blessing and cursing: therefore choose life, that both thou and thy seed may live:
(Deuteronomy 30:19)
One of my favorite verses Coop! Joshua really put it on the line didn't he? There are many gods the Bible states but like Johsua I too have chosen to serve Jehovah.
For (gar) is a marker of cause or reason positioned after a preceding clause and introducing the reason or cause for what has just been stated (see term of explanation) and here looks back not to Ro 2:13 but to Ro 2:12. Paul is explaining that the Gentiles also have a law so to speak by which they will be judged. Paul explains in this section that the Gentiles can be condemned without the law because their conscience (which is the work of the law written in their hearts) is enough to condemn them. As testimony to the truth of this principle, it is interesting to note that many of the unsaved pagan writers of Paul’s day referred to the "unwritten law" within man. Even these pagans recognized that there was something instinctively present within a man or a woman which tries to direct us in the right way. Remember that although all men are totally depraved in the sense that they cannot do anything that is righteously good, they can do a "man kind of good" like honoring their parents, paying their debts, etc. But every time they do that they prove that there is a law within them that points to that as good. Are they lost? Yes. Can they claim ignorance? No. As Paul pointed out in Romans 1, creation is around them proclaiming that God exists. In Romans 2 Paul is piling up the evidence against them, showing that by their conduct they prove that they have an inner moral law.I'm not saying that Romans 2:14-16 says men are saved by works.
I'm saying it shows us that the gospel message given to Abraham and recorded in the law, and fleshed out in the pages of our New Testaments is not the only testimony of the existence and justice of God by which men have faith and are acquitted on the Day of Christ.
The passage says these men who only have the testimony of God in nature and conscience are either condemned or acquitted on the Day of Christ "their consciences also bearing witness, and their thoughts either accusing or defending them on the day when God will judge men’s secrets through Christ Jesus" (Romans 2:15-16 BSB). So it most certainly is a knowledge of God upon which a person can either have faith, or not have faith, and be fairly judged on the Day of Christ. The passage says so.
Ray Stedman - Now, men are continually charging God with injustice because, they say, He condemns men to hell who have never heard of Jesus Christ. This is the most frequently voiced charge against the Christian gospel. We are always hearing somebody say, "Well, what about the heathen who never hear about Christ? How can a just God condemn them to hell without their hearing about Christ?" But, you see, God never condemns anybody on that basis. As we are told right here...That is, if you disobey the truth that you have, even though you have never heard of Moses or of Christ, you perish, not because you didn't hear of Moses or of Christ, but because you have disobeyed truth that you already know -- that is the whole point. If you know of Moses and of Christ, and you still disobey the truth, you perish also, because your condemnation is even greater -- because of the greater light involved. (Ed note: See above for discussion of the principle of judgment proportionate to light received) But, as it says here, even pagans have a form of basic law written on their hearts, and this is the basis of God's just condemnation of man. It is because they are not what they themselves know they ought to be. In other words, God judges you, not by some artificial standard of His, but by your own standard. (The Secrets of Men)I'm not saying that Romans 2:14-16 says men are saved by works.
I'm saying it shows us that the gospel message given to Abraham and recorded in the law, and fleshed out in the pages of our New Testaments is not the only testimony of the existence and justice of God by which men have faith and are acquitted on the Day of Christ.
The passage says these men who only have the testimony of God in nature and conscience are either condemned or acquitted on the Day of Christ "their consciences also bearing witness, and their thoughts either accusing or defending them on the day when God will judge men’s secrets through Christ Jesus" (Romans 2:15-16 BSB). So it most certainly is a knowledge of God upon which a person can either have faith, or not have faith, and be fairly judged on the Day of Christ. The passage says so.