in deed there is and its whole hart-idly agrees with all scripture .
It's worth pointing out here that you haven't actually addressed or even attempt to refute any of the passages and arguments I have posted. Why is that? You have either simply dismissed what I have said or poste other passages of Scripture, pitting Scripture against itself without actually trying to make sense of all of it.
I do have to wonder why it is there is so much hatred of the JW's . I do know Jesus was hated .it stands to reason anyone believing in Jesus and doing the things Jesus said to do would also be hated.
Mormons are "hated" as well and they believe in Jesus. But their Jesus is a literal son of God, by procreation, and brother of Satan. He is now just one of many gods. Does that mean that what they believe is true? People who spread falsehoods about God and about Jesus, especially in the name of Jesus, are not followers of the biblical Jesus. They do not have Jesus, which means they do not have the Father either.
Truth really,
really matters, especially the truth about who Jesus is. He is the central figure of all of Scripture, in whose name alone we have salvation. It stands to reason that we
cannot simply believe whatever we want about Jesus and be saved.
Joh 1:12 But to all who did receive him,
who believed in his name, he gave the right to become children of God, (ESV)
Joh 3:18 Whoever believes in him is not condemned, but whoever does not believe is condemned already, because
he has not believed in the name of the only Son of God. (ESV)
To believe in the name of Jesus is to believe in who he is--all that the name represents. It is absolutely crucial to believe that Jesus is who he says he is. Jesus tells us who he is, as do the rest of the NT writers, and it is clear that he is both truly God and truly man. There is simply no other conclusion when all the evidence is taken as a whole.
JWs get Jesus very wrong. They believe he was the archangel Michael, rose spiritually, and returned to being Michael. That is taught nowhere in the Bible. The Watchtower even changed a portion of the NWT just to make it agree with their theology, because they understood the implications. The interesting thing is, you quoted that very passage in the other discussion on the deity of Jesus. Here it is, Col. 1:15-17, from the
2013 version of the NWT:
15 He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of all creation; 16 because by means of him all other things were created in the heavens and on the earth, the things visible and the things invisible, whether they are thrones or lordships or governments or authorities. All other things have been created through him and for him. 17 Also, he is before all other things, and by means of him all other things were made to exist,
Notice that "other" has been added four times, despite it not appearing at all in the Greek text. That completely changes the meaning, because they, unlike you, recognized the implications of it not being there. The text tells us that everything that was created came into being by means of the Son. That precludes the Son from ever having been created or coming into being.
And, it is done deceitfully, and they know it. Here is how that passage appears in the
1984 version:
15 He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of all creation; 16 because by means of him all [other] things were created in the heavens and upon the earth, the things visible and the things invisible, no matter whether they are thrones or lordships or governments or authorities. All [other] things have been created through him and for him. 17 Also, he is before all [other] things
+ and by means of him all [other] things were made to exist,
Notice that "other" appears in square brackets ("[ ]"), which means that the word does not appear in the Greek texts, but has been added in the translation. But, they took those brackets out in the latest edition to make it appear as though "other" is in Greek text. Very, very deceptive.
More than that, this can be confirmed simply by looking at the passage in their very own
The Kingdom Interlinear Translation of the Greek Scriptures. Their own interlinear translation proves that "other" doesn't exist in the Greek text.
Of course, they only did it there and not anywhere else, such as in John 1:3 and 1 Cor. 8:6, making it contradict itself.