my post was about the best logical definition of "destroy" in Matt 10:28. Not so much about my views of the fate of un-believers or my view of the Gospel. My only claim about the un-beleivers' fate is the same as yours, they don't have the gift of Eternal Life but rather their fate is The Second Death. A Second Death that's more (not less) fearful than their 1st death.
If one's soul is annihilated, why would it be more fearful than their 1st death?
To receive Eternal Life, that's why.
Why would someone want or need eternal life if after their physical death, they will cease to exist? You haven't answered that question.
To save us from The Second Death, the LoF, Eternal destruction of the body and soul forever, the punishment for sin. Same answer as you give, right?
If one is annihilated in the LoF, so what? They cease to exist, so what they do on earth becomes irrelevant, don'tcha think?
Doesn't matter to who? It most certainly matters to humans. In fact, it's a life or death matter.
Why would it matter if one simply ceases to exist? There is no suffering when one has ceased to exist.
And it most certainly matters to God, too. It's the whole reason for creation (to glorify His Son through by the saving of those destined for Eternal Life from those destined for The Second Death).
Ooh, sounds rather reformed here.
I don't see how you think I've implied His death doesn't matter. For goodness sake, He died so that we can live eternally with Him. That's a lot of mattering.
You keep missing the point of your annihilation view. Since unbelievers will cease to exist, there will be no suffering for them, regardless of their lifestyle.
I think I see the problem here. In one breath you say that you don't get my view, then in the next say my view is an abuse to the whole Gospel. Which is it? You don't get my view or it's an abuse? It can't be both.
Yes, it's both. by not "getting" it I mean I'm not buying it.
The Second Death, the Lake of Fire, Eternal Destruction of both the body and the soul. That's what we have been saved from, right?
If those going to the LoF will cease to exist, so what? After the so-called annihilation, there will be no suffering.
But regardless all this is off-topic to my question about how your two different posted views of Matt 10:28's "destroy" the body and soul seem to conflict with each other and neither view makes much sense of the text of Matt 10:28. Is it a metaphorical destruction of the body and the soul that Jesus says fear or is it a command to fear something God will never actually (literally) do.
Which is it on your view?
I've been clear. Jesus spoke of the "everlasting fire" in Matt 25:41, so I believe the LoF is eternal. John spoke of a "torment for ever and ever" in Rev 20:10, so I believe the LoF is eternal.
You've shown no verses to support your view.