John, here is part of the post I am working on in response to yours. I will do more when I have time.
That piece is not from the plane in the official report.
Which piece? Looks like a pile of metal to me with many pieces. Investigators even said it was very difficult to distinguish pieces from each other because the debris from the plane and building mixed together. Sort of like slamming two lego pieces together.
The fire vaporized engines but not these flimsy pieces of scrap? Eyebrow raiser
It isn’t an eyebrow raiser….
Who said any metal was vaporized? Some of it was charred, but I do not recall anyone saying anything was vaporized. How do you vaporize metal anyway? Are the temperatures needed to turn metal into vapour even achievable on earth?
Further more are you suggesting these people in the pictures were planting evidence?
Look at the long trail and LOT OF DEBRIS. Sorry but that wreck looks nothing at all like the supposed flight 93 site.
It looks a lot like it. The debris is more concentrated, but that plane really shattered when it hit.
Heres another one for you. The top is a photo of all of the recovered parts from the site of the crash below it. Also note, and I can cite this tomorrow if you wish, 95% of flight 93's remains were recovered.
that is from a large plane that crashed in a similar way 93 is suspected to have crashed. Looks like a bunch of little pieces.
Here is the full article with more pictures:
http://web.ukonline.co.uk/lait/site/Can ... 0WD991.htm
Also, look up flight 585. very similar as well. Lots of small pieces from a high speed deep angle upside down crash.
The pieces are very similar in size and scattering concentration to flight 93.
Here is a small photo
*edit its not pulling the right photo so I will just link the site.
http://www.airdisaster.com/special/special-ua585.shtml
Witnesses said the plane hit the ground and did not bounce or move, it just dissapeared in a cloud of dirt and debris. You can find some videos of it as well on you tube and the site looks very similar to 93.
Passenger jets are surprisingly fragile crafts. They are built to be light and efficient. I will have to look into this to remember exactly, but I am pretty sure they are sheets of metal built around a frame. There are lots of rivets and bolts holding pieces together, therefore when they crash, they break up alot.
That is why you see a 16' diamter hole in the pentagon, and no cut through where the wings hit. The wings are bolted and weilded to the main compartment. It just ripped them off and shattered them. Interestingly enough, a 757 is about 16' in diamter or thereabouts. I do not know of any missile outside of a large booster like they use on shuttle launches or ICBMs that have that large of a diameter.
As for the telephone poles being knocked down, which seems more likely, a small diameter missile hitting those poles, or a low flying 757 with a 130' wingspan clipping them and knocking them over?