Jethro Bodine
Member
(Post removed. Response to deleted post. Obadiah)
Last edited by a moderator:
Join For His Glory for a discussion on how
https://christianforums.net/threads/a-vessel-of-honor.110278/
https://christianforums.net/threads/psalm-70-1-save-me-o-god-lord-help-me-now.108509/
Read through the following study by Tenchi for more on this topic
https://christianforums.net/threads/without-the-holy-spirit-we-can-do-nothing.109419/
Join Sola Scriptura for a discussion on the subject
https://christianforums.net/threads/anointed-preaching-teaching.109331/#post-1912042
Strengthening families through biblical principles.
Focus on the Family addresses the use of biblical principles in parenting and marriage to strengthen the family.
Read daily articles from Focus on the Family in the Marriage and Parenting Resources forum.
James was speaking from the perspective of others, not the perspective of God. When one misunderstands this, they conclude that one must include works in order to be saved. Which contradicts many other Scriptures.This seems to be a really provocative thread title, but it really is just a quotation from Scripture.
You see that a person is justified by works and not by faith alone. James 2:24 (ESV)
What is your take on this text? What does it mean?
It was my pleasure!Can my heart stand it? Someone who thinks. Thank you for a beautifully logical post.
No sir! It's all yours.I'm gonna save that little gem, FG. (Unless you object?)
From the account of Abraham that James uses to illustrate his point:James was speaking from the perspective of others, not the perspective of God. When one misunderstands this, they conclude that one must include works in order to be saved. Which contradicts many other Scriptures.
No, not so ludicrous:The context of James 2:14-26 is about demonstrating one's faith. It begins with an example of that in v.15 and 16. The example is of a believer who is hypocritical. Not of one who is unsaved. It would be ludicrous to claim that anyone who is hypocritical is unsaved.
The verse most certainly is the angel speaking,"12 He said, ... now I know that you fear God, (Genesis 22:12 NASB)
The account most certainly is from the perspective of God.
In his teaching, Jesus says the"48 "But if that evil slave ....Matthew 24:48-51 NASB
In his teaching, Jesus says the hypocrite...
I see. So you believe that God is not omniscient and had to test Abe in order to determine his attitude toward God. I certainly disagree. God is omniscient and that means He has always known everything.From the account of Abraham that James uses to illustrate his point:
"12 He said, "Do not stretch out your hand against the lad, and do nothing to him; for now I know that you fear God, since you have not withheld your son, your only son, from Me."" (Genesis 22:12 NASB)
The account most certainly is from the perspective of God.
Those who use parables to inform their doctrine are on very shaky ground. Why? Because Jesus used parables to teach truths that would be difficult for people to understand. But your view is to take them nearly literally, which they AREN'T meant to be. And your view spiritualizes them. [This isn't a competition where the winner is determined by points scored.]No, not so ludicrous:
"48 "But if that evil slave says in his heart, 'My master is not coming for a long time,' 49 and begins to beat his fellow slaves and eat and drink with drunkards; 50 the master of that slave will come on a day when he does not expect him and at an hour which he does not know, 51 and will cut him in pieces and assign him a place with the hypocrites; in that place (hell) there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth." (Matthew 24:48-51 NASB parenthesis mine)
In his teaching, Jesus says the hypocrite who is not ready for the return of the master goes to hell--the place of torment where unbelievers go. I say to the church that you are playing with fire if you think you can be a hypocrite and think you can't possibly go to hell.
Thanks for the detailed response on this Chessman. I don't have a personal investment on this issue as my theology on the matter remains intact regardless of this interpretation. However, I have always found the standard protestant understanding a bit lacking.Yes. Here's why:
James 2:1-4 (LEB) My brothers, do not hold your faith in our glorious Lord Jesus Christ with partiality.
[then gives several examples of what He means by "holding" and "partiality" of another brother's faith.]
For if someone enters into your assembly in fine clothing with a gold ring on his finger, and a poor person in filthy clothing also enters, ...
[you cannot judge a person's true/inner faith by the clothes they are wearing or how much money/gold they have, or anything else you can physically see. Except their works, of course, and what they tell you they have faith in.]
and you look favorably on the one wearing the fine clothing and you say, “Be seated here in a good place,” and to the poor person you say, “You stand or be seated there by my footstool,” have you not made distinctions among yourselves and become judges with evil thoughts?
[notice also that if we do try to make distinctions and look more/less favorably at another's faith based on anything other than their stated faith (see v 14, 18) or works, then we have evil thoughts. Which, BTW, puts a new perspective on all the accusations that flow around here.]
James 2:1, 14, 18 My brothers, do not hold your faith in our glorious Lord Jesus Christ with partiality.
...
What is the benefit, my brothers, if someone says that he has faith but does not have works?
[implied answer is none. There is no benefit to a said faith. See v24]
That faith is not able to save him, is it? But someone will say, “You have faith and I have works.” Show me your faith apart from your works, and I will show you my faith by my works.
[again, these verses support what James is speaking of in v 24.]
I would not have used 'vindicated' but rather indicated. it's not our role/responsibility to be passing guilt out to others based on our preception of their inner faith.
Apparently God wanted it demonstrated through his works.The verse most certainly is the angel speaking,
You ... Verse 11
Genesis 22:11-12 (LEB) And the angel of Yahweh called to him from heaven ... He [the angel] said; "For now I know ...
Plus, the point is that the angel told Abraham something so that Abraham would know what it was that was being said, not that God had need to know something about Abraham.
The areas that I find lacking in this evaluation are here below.James was speaking from the perspective of others, not the perspective of God. When one misunderstands this, they conclude that one must include works in order to be saved. Which contradicts many other Scriptures.
The context of James 2:14-26 is about demonstrating one's faith. It begins with an example of that in v.15 and 16. The example is of a believer who is hypocritical. Not of one who is unsaved. It would be ludicrous to claim that anyone who is hypocritical is unsaved. Many believers can be and are hypocritical, and James was urging believers to demonstrate their faith to others.
James 2:18
But someone may well say, “You have faith and I have works; show me your faith without the works, and I will show you my faith by my works.” NASB
The "someone" here is challenging the reader about his faith by the statement: "you have faith". He is also noting that he has works. The challenge of this "someone" is to show or demonstrate your faith without works. How can one do that? It is impossible to demonstrate one's faith without works. One can indicate they are a Christian, but if they act like the one in 2:15-16, they are being a hypocrite.
And finally, the "someone" says that he WILL demonstrate his faith by his works.
There are many Scriptures that speak to the fact that others observe the believer and judge the believer by his actions. James is making that point in 2:26.
Here are some verses that clearly indicate that we are to live our lives with the perspective of others in view: (NASB)
2 Cor 8:21 - for we have regard for what is honorable, not only in the sight of the Lord, but also in the sight of men.
Rom 12:17 - Never pay back evil for evil to anyone. Respect what is right in the sight of all men.
Rom 14:18 - For he who in this way serves Christ is acceptable to God and approved by men.
1 Tim 3:7 - And he must have a good reputation (works to demonstrate one's faith) with those outside the church (unbelievers), so that he will not fall into reproach and the snare of the devil.
1 Thess 4:12 - so that you will behave properly toward outsiders (don't be a hypocrite) and not be in any need.
1 Pet 2:12 - Keep your behavior excellent (works to demonstrate your faith) among the Gentiles, so that in the thing in which they slander you as evildoers, they may because of your good deeds, as they observe them, glorify God in the day of visitation.
1 Jn 3:18 - Little children, let us not love with word or with tongue, but in deed and truth. (clearly speaking against being hypocritical) Directly applicable to James 2:15-16.
This seems to be a really provocative thread title, but it really is just a quotation from Scripture.
You see that a person is justified by works and not by faith alone. James 2:24 (ESV)
What is your take on this text? What does it mean?
Just read every word of it and responded.Didn't you guys even read one word of this?
http://christianforums.net/Fellowsh...-not-by-faith-alone.57742/page-3#post-1045407
How then does this text say that a person is not justified by faith alone, but also by works?Ephesians 2:8-10 (NIV)
8 For it is by grace you have been saved, through faith—and this not from yourselves, it is the gift of God—
9 not by works, so that no one can boast.
10 For we are God’s workmanship, created in Christ Jesus to do good works, which God prepared in advance for us to do.
The works are not the justification but rather the evidence.
For the points I made. There is justification in the eyes of men, as well as justification in the eyes of God. And I proved that James' point was being justified in the eyes of others. Believers who demonstrate their faith before others are hypocritical and are NOT justified in their eyes. Which is why they are called hypocrites by others.The areas that I find lacking in this evaluation are here below.
1) Why does James use the word "justified" the same as Paul, which is only used in this context in regards to a judgment rendered by God? (See James 2:24)
Here is the Scripture:2) Why does James refer to the story of Abraham's works being validated not by man, but by God in Genesis 22:12?
I believe that every act of belief towards God is counted as righteousness. Please don't apply this verse to salvation, since Abraham was saved way before he took Issac to the mountain for sacrifice.3) Why was the statement, "Abraham believed and it was counted to him as righteousness," fulfilled in the act of not withholding his son from God?
Yes sir. And I have answered them directly.These are key questions, and they are central to the context of what James is talking about.
Yes, he is. What is the point? My point stands whether James was doing the challenging, or his use of a hypothetical.In regards, to the references to the "someone," James is simply offering hypothetical situation.
Only until you can demonstrate that my explanation of the passage is in error can we actually discuss v.14. It seems you've made the mistake of assuming that James was thinking of "saving faith" just because the words touch in the sentence.What good is it, my brothers, if someone says he has faith but does not have works? Can that faith save him? James 2:14 (ESV)
The if, makes it a hypothetical statement, to illustrate the point between an admission of faith that is not accompanied by works. The question here is, can that faith save him? The answer we discover is no, that faith cannot save him. Mere belief is not salvific.
This is a red herring. The only point of James here is that he notes that demons believe in monotheism. Which isn't saving faith, btw. Please note that. In fact, it's apples and oranges to even try to make any kind of statement about what demons believe and how that may affect them. Of course they believe that God is One, and that Jesus is the Christ, the Holy One of God. Why? They were there, in heaven, before any of them rebelled along with satan. So of course they would know that.You believe that God is one; you do well. Even the demons believe—and shudder! James 2:19 (ESV)
Of course demons do not believe the same way, they merely have correct theology about who God is, yet Abraham actively trusted in God which "was completed by his works."
Doesn't matter. Paul's point was that works don't save. Only faith saves. James' point was that believers need to demonstrate their faith to others so they won't be hypocrites.I think one of the key issues at hand is whether or not the "works" Paul was referencing is the same as James. For we hold that one is justified by faith apart from works of the law. Romans 3:28 (ESV) Interesting.